Deranged Rhino Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Well, yeah. It's perfectly consistent with their deeply held beliefs: "One et of rules for you, and another set of rules for us." Or as George Orwell stated it "For legs good, two legs bad." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: All they had to do was not be crazy... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Things are about to break. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 But what about his 4th grade report card and the comments his teacher made about how he reacted with paste, blunt scissors, colored kraft paper, tongue depressors, and dildos? Inquiring minds want to know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 24 minutes ago, Nanker said: But what about his 4th grade report card and the comments his teacher made about how he reacted with paste, blunt scissors, colored kraft paper, tongue depressors, and dildos? Inquiring minds want to know! I want to know more about that time he sexually assaulted little Sally Smith on the playground when he forced himself upon her by pulling her pig tail as they ran around the playground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: He's not or he can't. Big difference between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 The Silence of Mueller’s Trump-Russia ‘Canaries.’ “No evidence has surfaced indicating that President Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. Still, two years later, the president’s opponents insist the truth is out there.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: The Silence of Mueller’s Trump-Russia ‘Canaries.’ “No evidence has surfaced indicating that President Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. Still, two years later, the president’s opponents insist the truth is out there.” The Mulders and Scullys of the left. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 "MORE: Calling ballots "massively infected," Pres. Trump made claims of fraud without providing any evidence." Also Known as the "Blasey Ford maneuver" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 12, 2018 Author Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Corsi and Stone have about as much connection to Trump's campaign as I do. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 More on the above: Reminder - if Mueller is going after InfoWars that lines up very very nicely with my Mueller/Trump theories. Corsi is a bad actor. Stone is a bad actor. Both deserve to be indicted. Both have serve masters that are not Russian nor American. Stone - after years of claiming to be a very inside man in Trump's campaign had to admit last week he never spoke to Trump during the campaign but for one phone call... where he recommended Paul Manafort to Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 12, 2018 Author Share Posted November 12, 2018 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Corsi and Stone have about as much connection to Trump's campaign as I do. WikiLeaks Coordination? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: WikiLeaks Coordination? That will be the spin/hope until the indictments hit, but it's an investigatory dead end, I promise. I've spent a lot of time trying to line them up and couldn't do it, even with the help of some pros. Neither Stone nor Corsi are connected to Wikileaks other than attempts (public attempts) to gain access to Assange. That brings us back to the discussion of how Wikileaks fits into this whole narrative... Wikileaks isn't a Russian outlet. There's zero evidence to support this other than Assange rooting for Trump over Clinton - which he would have done with or without the Russian situation. Hillary wanted to drone the embassy. She saw Assange as an existential threat to her. Trump saw Assange as a potential ally. That's the difference. Assange isn't a Russian asset (he's worse, he's a pure anarchist). That will end up going nowhere as well. Stone tried like hell to tie himself to Assange, just as he did with Trump's campaign. Both lack the evidence to support it other than pictures (from his own social media) of Stone outside the embassy. The reality here, which no one wants to discuss because it's "so long ago" now, is that Wikileaks did not hack the DNC or DCCC or Clinton servers. The reality is they were given that information from a second source. The ICA wants to say that second source was Guciffer 2.0 (who, I've gone through great lengths to lay out the evidence that proves Guciffer 2.0 was a CrowdStrike creation). Assange himself has always said (without saying) that his source was someone on the inside of the DNC/DCCC/Clinton campaigns. If that is true, then the entire foundation of the Russia collusion narrative goes away. That's why it's important to the media to keep Wikileaks painted as a Russian outlet, Assange as a Russian asset, and Stone and Corsi as working with him. The truth is though, there's no evidence to support those claims. In fact, there's mountains of evidence that contradicts it (including Assange's own publishing records which made Putin's political life hell for close to a decade before 2016). 16 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: WikiLeaks Coordination? Addendum to this (quoting you again so you see it when the posts merge ) I can (quietly) confirm Corsi has spoken to Assange. I can't, at this time, say why/how I know that but I know it to be true. I know these conversations happened after the publication of Podesta's emails. My assumption - and it's just that, not claiming to know - is that Corsi denied this to Mueller and Stone threw him under the bus. That would result in him being indicted for perjury and would sound REAL bad in the press: "Corsi spoke to Assange!". The reality is, it's real bad for Corsi and Stone but irrelevant to the collusion/coordination question between Trump's campaign and Putin's intelligence agencies. Edited November 12, 2018 by Deranged Rhino 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Another good piece... https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/01/mueller-jerome-corsi-roger-stone/ If Corsi and Assange communicated about the emails before they were released (which I've not been able to confirm), it still comes down to whether or not Wikileaks is a Russian front or not. If it's not, and it isn't, then it's irrelevant to the "Russian collusion" narrative. That will be the hidden story when the indictment becomes public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts