DC Tom Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, BigMcD said: Complete bull####. Did you even look? You sound like trump and apparently think people can’t look up stats. WRONG! Yes, I actually did. You managed to pick a time frame that starts with the last time a Canadian team won a Stanley Cup, being about 90% Canadians on the roster, then steadily drops until 8 of the last 10 winners were about 40% Canadian. Maybe you should look up the stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Yes, I actually did. You managed to pick a time frame that starts with the last time a Canadian team won a Stanley Cup, being about 90% Canadians on the roster, then steadily drops until 8 of the last 10 winners were about 40% Canadian. Maybe you should look up the stats. Lol moron. Every team you mentioned had more Canadians than any other. Pens x 2 devils, Blackhawks and canes you ***** retard! Lol nice try! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Just now, BigMcD said: Lol moron. Every team you mentioned had more Canadians than any other. Pens x 2 devils, Blackhawks and canes you ***** retard! Lol nice try! But you said "a majority of Canadians," not "more Canadians than any other," you dumbass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: But you said "a majority of Canadians," not "more Canadians than any other," you dumbass. Yes a majority compared to other countries. Does any other country have more players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 You guys should get back to talking about stuff you know, like guns and killing each other! And maybe the fact that your leader is one of the biggest d-bags on the planet. Go Merica! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 55 minutes ago, BigMcD said: Yes a majority compared to other countries. Does any other country have more players? That's not what "majority" means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 59 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's not what "majority" means. Well, he is Canadian. The exchange rate addles their brains. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 there is talk that the Buzzfeed story might have been a plant to find a leaker, which would make a good bit of sense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Foxx said: there is talk that the Buzzfeed story might have been a plant to find a leaker, which would make a good bit of sense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canary_trap A canary trap is a method for exposing an information leak by giving different versions of a sensitive document to each of several suspects and seeing which version gets leaked. It could be one false statement, to see if sensitive information gets out to other people as well. Special attention is paid to the quality of the prose of the unique language, in the hopes that the suspect will repeat it verbatim in the leak, thereby identifying the version of the document. The term was coined by Tom Clancy in his novel Patriot Games, although Clancy did not invent the technique. The actual method (usually referred to as a barium meal test in espionage circles) has been used by intelligence agencies for many years. The fictional character Jack Ryan describes the technique he devised for identifying the sources of leaked classified documents: Each summary paragraph has six different versions, and the mixture of those paragraphs is unique to each numbered copy of the paper. There are over a thousand possible permutations, but only ninety-six numbered copies of the actual document. The reason the summary paragraphs are so lurid is to entice a reporter to quote them verbatim in the public media. If he quotes something from two or three of those paragraphs, we know which copy he saw and, therefore, who leaked it. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 3 hours ago, Foxx said: there is talk that the Buzzfeed story might have been a plant to find a leaker, which would make a good bit of sense. And this is yet another reason to not fully trust the news. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 On behalf of Canada, I’d like to apologize for the behavior of my fellow canadian. We do not approve of his behavior and asshattery. He will be sent to Nunavut for punishment. 1 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 20 hours ago, DC Tom said: NOW you're looking for nuance? Now? Now??? A special prosecutor commented on a news report on his ongoing investigation, to call it "inaccurate." That doesn't mean "a lot of things." It means "Holy shitballs, Buzzfeed. You done gone and ***** up so royally that I feel compelled to break my professional code of conduct." The best part about all of this is how much Muellers word is taken as gospel. Even the Trumptards are taking his word as solid truth. Love it! 4 hours ago, Foxx said: there is talk that the Buzzfeed story might have been a plant to find a leaker, which would make a good bit of sense. Buzzfeed is claiming they have gotten a lot of info in the past from these sources so that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canary_trap A canary trap is a method for exposing an information leak by giving different versions of a sensitive document to each of several suspects and seeing which version gets leaked. It could be one false statement, to see if sensitive information gets out to other people as well. Special attention is paid to the quality of the prose of the unique language, in the hopes that the suspect will repeat it verbatim in the leak, thereby identifying the version of the document. The term was coined by Tom Clancy in his novel Patriot Games, although Clancy did not invent the technique. The actual method (usually referred to as a barium meal test in espionage circles) has been used by intelligence agencies for many years. The fictional character Jack Ryan describes the technique he devised for identifying the sources of leaked classified documents: Each summary paragraph has six different versions, and the mixture of those paragraphs is unique to each numbered copy of the paper. There are over a thousand possible permutations, but only ninety-six numbered copies of the actual document. The reason the summary paragraphs are so lurid is to entice a reporter to quote them verbatim in the public media. If he quotes something from two or three of those paragraphs, we know which copy he saw and, therefore, who leaked it. By this example, in the Buzzfeed article it would be the truth, re-worded. Your quoted language does cut out an exception for "it could be one false statement". But that appears to be the exception, not the rule. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 30 minutes ago, meazza said: On behalf of Canada, I’d like to apologize for the behavior of my fellow canadian. We do not approve of his behavior and asshattery. He will be sent to Nunavut for punishment. You are Merican now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Tiberius said: ... Buzzfeed is claiming they have gotten a lot of info in the past from these sources so that makes sense. but, but... it is an impeachable offense. the Democrats wettest dream come true. why aren't these 'sources' stepping forward to do what the Left so desperately wants? hint: because they aren't legit. 12 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The best part about all of this is how much Muellers word is taken as gospel. Even the Trumptards are taking his word as solid truth. Love it! ... ah yes. after listening to you incessantly stake your whole Trump downfall narrative on what Mueller will be producing only to see you now change that narrative. priceless! Edited January 20, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, BigMcD said: You are Merican now! Yes, he believes in good behavior. He wants us to know that not every Canadian is a lowlife pos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Yes, he believes in good behavior. He wants us to know that not every Canadian is a lowlife pos. ***** you douche! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, Foxx said: but, but... it is an impeachable offense. the Democrats wettest dream come true. why aren't these 'sources' stepping forward to do what the Left so desperately wants? hint: because they aren't legit. ah yes. after listening to you incessantly stake your whole Trump downfall narrative on what Mueller will be producing only to see you now change that narrative. priceless! If you actually see this as some sort of victory for your side and Trump's free pass, you are not dealing with reality. What is the main reason the story seems so believable? Trump's constant non-stop lying. You know he lies all the time, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: If you actually see this as some sort of victory for your side and Trump's free pass, you are not dealing with reality. What is the main reason the story seems so believable? Trump's constant non-stop lying. You know he lies all the time, right? two solid years of #orangemanbad without a scintilla of evidence. keep yelling from the rooftops though to inform everyone how deep your Trump Derangement Syndrome is. Edited January 20, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 This act is getting kind of old. Yet another Trump ´bombshell´ends up being a hoax Washington Examiner, by Editorial Original Article OK. How embarrassing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts