Deranged Rhino Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I'm guessing Kushner. On the Russian payroll? Might want to rethink that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I have no worry about what you think or opine on with regard to what I offer. Carry on. Then you should stick to the main board where your aggregation is relegated to actual facts, as opposed to the nonsense you vomit up here. Here, you'll be evicerated for your hackery, and your usual race baiting. Own your content, or shut the !@#$ up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 19, 2017 Author Share Posted May 19, 2017 Then you should stick to the main board where your aggregation is relegated to actual facts, as opposed to the nonsense you vomit up here. Here, you'll be evicerated for your hackery, and your usual race baiting. Own your content, or shut the !@#$ up. If only you could make me !@#$ up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 If only you could make me !@#$ up. You bring nothing to this section of the forum. You're irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 19, 2017 Author Share Posted May 19, 2017 (edited) You bring nothing to this section of the forum. You're irrelevant. Then you should not respond to me. That would prove your point. Edited May 19, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 If only you could make me !@#$ up. Oh, I can't make you shut up, but I can certainly make it apparent to the rest of the board that you should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I just love how these leaks come out in dribs and drabs. Almost as if they're slow-rolling everything to keep it front-page. @redsteeze: Is there a transparent effort by media to drive Trump's presidency into the ground - Yes Does he make it insanely easy for them - Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 @redsteeze: Is there a transparent effort by media to drive Trump's presidency into the ground - Yes Does he make it insanely easy for them - Yes Both may be true but one of those things is not like the other though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Then you should not respond to me. That would prove your point. This what I've observed about your posting: You post something weak like an unsubstantiated rumor. You get challenged. You don't come back to defend your premise but respond with some stupid-like schit like "time to lawyer up". This is how gator posts. Don't be another gator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 This what I've observed about your posting: You post something weak like an unsubstantiated rumor. You get challenged. You don't come back to defend your premise but respond with some stupid-like schit like "time to lawyer up". This is how gator posts. Don't be another gator. You may call certain things I post unsubstantiated rumors, while I may consider them to be legit sources of information. I'm not going to argue over that based upon a certain person's propensity to believe based upon being a hardcore ideologue. The information will either be proven true or not. Accept that or not...it's up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 You may call certain things I post unsubstantiated rumors, while I may consider them to be legit sources of information. I'm not going to argue over that based upon a certain person's propensity to believe based upon being a hardcore ideologue. The information will either be proven true or not. Accept that or not...it's up to you. Anonymous reports are not legitimate sources. It appears that if something fits your narrative, in your mind it's legit. Good luck with that here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 Anonymous reports are not legitimate sources. It appears that if something fits your narrative, in your mind it's legit. Good luck with that here. You mean source like Mark Felt back in the Watergate days? Okay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 You mean source like Mark Felt back in the Watergate days? Okay! You continue to post in the same !@#$ing manner as gator, just as I explained to you. You can't even see it, can you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) You continue to post in the same !@#$ing manner as gator, just as I explained to you. You can't even see it, can you? I just cited a classic example of an anonymous source that proved to be completely legit. What I see is that I refuted your nonsense. Edited May 20, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Link man is getting hazed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I just cited a classic example of an anonymous source that proved to be completely legit. What I see is that I refuted your nonsense. Did you know that relying on the lottery for your retirement is viable because sometimes people win the lottery? That makes about as much sense as what you have been posting. Keep up this ridiculous schit and you'll be laughed right out of here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 On the Russian payroll? Might want to rethink that. It doesn't have to be a payroll thing, it could be he is a middle man or something else. They wanted to set up a back channel around our government channels--that's why State Department is being understaffed??--so someone had to be there Trump trusted to set that up. Kushner did do this http://thehill.com/policy/international/russia/326049-kushner-met-russian-bank-executives-report So who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) Did you know that relying on the lottery for your retirement is viable because sometimes people win the lottery? That makes about as much sense as what you have been posting. Keep up this ridiculous schit and you'll be laughed right out of here. What a dumb analogy! You must know nothing about investigative journalism to make such a silly comparison. Edited May 20, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 What a dumb analogy! You must know nothing about investigative journalism to make such a silly comparison. What are you calling investigative journalism? Throwing schit against the wall to see what might stick is not in any sense journalism. Just because you hope the rumors are true because they fit your narrative doesn't make them legitimate. It makes you an Innuendo Whore (all credit to Azalin). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I appreciate your participation, 26CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts