YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 (edited) @adamschefter NFL notified teams that Michigans Jabril Peppers tested positive for a dilute sample at the combine, league sources tell ESPN. Edited April 24, 2017 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolishDave Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 @adamschefter NFL notified teams that Michigans Jabril Peppers tested positive for a dilute sample at the combine, league sources tell ESPN. No..... Chalk up another idiot. #neverplayforBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 @albertbreer This lands Peppers in the drug program. Borderline first-rounder before, now may drop a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blokestradamus Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 The smile on my face is a broad one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Bills in the 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billz4life820 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 good because i not want him in the first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Dilute sample = testing positive? To me, this sounds more like something happened that prevented credible results, such as using fake urine. That would be different from straight-up testing positive for X/Y/Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 this guy nailed it Eric Askew @mropenyolegs 30 Dec 2016 More Peppers dun failed a drug test I bet ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 (edited) Dilute sample = testing positive? To me, this sounds more like something happened that prevented credible results, such as using fake urine. That would be different from straight-up testing positive for X/Y/Z. diluted tends to be a "fail" in many settings, even if its not a positive. Edited April 24, 2017 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellyToughII Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 The smile on my face is a broad one. Only if he is there in the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Dilute sample = testing positive? To me, this sounds more like something happened that prevented credible results, such as using fake urine. That would be different from straight-up testing positive for X/Y/Z. Dilute sample generally just means the sample was watered down. If you drink a couple gallons of water the day before or the day of this will happen. Doesn't necessarily mean there WAS anything in the sample, but since it hinders test results it counts as an automatic positive so people don't do the whole "drink a lot of water/gatorade to screw up results" thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 He tested negative for coverage skills *I'll be here all week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwalter Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 damn son - character was his main selling point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 Dilute sample = testing positive? To me, this sounds more like something happened that prevented credible results, such as using fake urine. That would be different from straight-up testing positive for X/Y/Z. diluted sample = positive test by NFL standards. They enter drug program and will be suspended 4 games with next positive test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Dilute sample = testing positive? To me, this sounds more like something happened that prevented credible results, such as using fake urine. That would be different from straight-up testing positive for X/Y/Z. Same thing Foster had.. Foster claims he was sick , drinking Gatorade and fluid like crazy to hydrate..sure Peppers will claim something similair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blokestradamus Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Only if he is there in the 2nd. 3rd round running back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnBonhamRocks Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Dilute sample generally just means the sample was watered down. If you drink a couple gallons of water the day before or the day of this will happen. Doesn't necessarily mean there WAS anything in the sample, but since it hinders test results it counts as an automatic positive so people don't do the whole "drink a lot of water/gatorade to screw up results" thing. Seems like some innocent people could get caught up in that, seeing as I'd probably drink a lot of water and/or Gatorade if I were preparing for a day on which my physical talents will earn or lose possibly millions of dollars. Then again, same logic for not doing drugs during that same time period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 3rd round running back. yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts