Jump to content

Trump's Request For Voters Information (changed topic)


Recommended Posts

The Giants nearly lost SB XXV.

Well, it's 1 out of 435 districts. A SB analogy is a bit of an overreach. Last night was definitely a blow to Dems though because they stupidly put money into a campaign in a red district who haven't elected a Democrat since Jimmy Carter was president. Save the money for '18 for the purple districts that you can flip if Trump continues to be Trump.

 

The most interesting thing going forward is are the Democrats going to continue with the policies of simply screaming Trump and the GOP are evil or are they going to go with a progressive platform - single payer, raise federal minimum wage, oppose trade deals, free college (YUCK), reduce military spending, invest in infrastructure, higher taxes on the rich, anti fracking, etc..

Hey libs...wanna stop being in these photos? Step 1: Get rid of Pelosi.

 

DC2jIV6XkAIfp_N.jpg

 

LOL. I lean left but some of these liberals need to grow a fricken spine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My favorite caption to this photo so far is "Breaking: Feminists cry after woman wins election vs rich white male."

 

LOL. All I knew about the guy was that that he looked like Anthony Weiner's son.

 

How's identity politics and the blame game working for you Dems? Your 2016 platform of Trump is evil worked out splendidly. Let's keep doing it so we can lose more elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Dem losses yesterday, including Jon Ossoff’s loss to Karen Handel in Georgia’s 6th District, the Left is weighing in with ways to “fix” the party. Sally Kohn’s idea should be taken into consideration by the DNC: :lol:

 

Best thing that could come out of the #GA06 results is for Democratic Party to finally give up its self-destructive obsession with centrism

 

 

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAR_AAAAJDNjZjFjNGZlLTc2MGYt...7 months later and they STILL don't know why they lost.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Republican won in a red state. This is really a surprise to anyone?

 

Claiming it as a "Trump victory" is meaningless gesture by the media

 

 

I was very afraid the Dems were going to win it.

 

Which meant that the whole USA had repudiated Trump completely.

 

Oh well.... when's the next one?

 

Did the media propagandize for the 1899 Cleveland Spiders as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Dem losses yesterday, including Jon Ossoff’s loss to Karen Handel in Georgia’s 6th District, the Left is weighing in with ways to “fix” the party. Sally Kohn’s idea should be taken into consideration by the DNC: :lol:

 

 

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAR_AAAAJDNjZjFjNGZlLTc2MGYt...7 months later and they STILL don't know why they lost.

 

And Dan Rather is still standing on the steps of the US Supreme Court parsing through their decision and trying desperately to read into it an understanding that it really means Al Gore actually won Florida and the Presidency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Rather, what a symbol of everything that fell apart with the drive-by media.

 

I see he's ranting on Larry King's show on Russia Today last week.

 

That must have been quite enlightening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GA-6: ‘The Big Short’ and the Establishment Media Bubble.



FTA:


Democrats had poured an estimated $30 million into “Pajamaboy Carpetbagger” Jon Osoff’s doomed campaign and came away with another “L,” their fourth consecutive special-election defeat since Trump’s election.



Democrats’ hope of returning to power by riding a wave of anti-Trump “backlash” has been exposed as a delusion based on denial. Along with their media allies, Democrats simply refuse to accept the reality that American voters have rejected them. Democrats are the ex-boyfriend who refuses to move on, and voters are the girl getting stalked on Facebook by an obsessed loser who can’t take a hint. It’s creepy.



The now iconic image of the CNN crew at 9:43 pm ET Tuesday is a perfect distillation of a problem we can call the Establishment Media Bubble.


DCzyn3ZVwAAceqS.jpg



Those pictured were CNN’s political director David Chalian, CNN’s chief political analyst Gloria Berger, CNN’s executive director of Political Programming/Sr. Political Analyst Mark Preston, and Chief Political Correspondent Dana Bash.



The pretense of journalistic objectivity, which is the Establishment Media’s stock in trade, has become so transparently implausible that no intelligent viewer could be deceived by it. Beyond that, and perhaps more importantly, the media’s pretense of political expertise was even more brutally exposed as a fraud — a hoax as bogus as “Haven Monahan.”



If Mark Preston is such an insightful political analyst, why couldn’t CNN accurately predict the outcome of this election? For the same reason that CNN was so disastrously wrong in 2016: They are no longer a news organization, but instead are a Democrat propaganda operation. Mark Preston is a partisan Democrat who, as a University of Massachusetts student, worked in Ted Kennedy’s office. Ask yourself this question: In his role as a CNN executive, would Mark Preston ever hire a reporter who had worked for Rand Paul or Ted Cruz? Answer: !@#$ no.



CNN, like every other Establishment Media organization, actively discriminates against Republicans in its hiring decisions. Mark Preston’s network is a sort of political cult that only employs True Believers. The organization’s journalistic standards are subordinated to its political mission, which is to persuade viewers to vote Democrat. Period.



snip}



The Democrat viewers who let CNN convince them that Jon Osoff was going to win GA-6, and thereby vindicate the anti-Trump #Resistance, learned nothing from Tuesday night’s results. Those viewers woke up this morning and turned on their TVs to watch the “experts” on CNN explain to them what went wrong and what this means for the future. But why should anyone believe the Establishment Media’s explanations for another Democrat defeat, when the Establishment Media failed to predict this defeat, in the same way they failed to predict Hillary’s defeat?



Stephen Miller at Heat Street summarizes the result:


Herein lies the Democrats’ problem, just as it was a problem when Hillary Clinton bellowed about a basket full of deplorables during the 2016 campaign. The Democrats and their base (Hollywood) think the key to winning elections is to insult voters. “They don’t vote for us because they are bigots” is not a strategy I would employ as a campaign manager but they are welcome to keep trying this, and they are welcome to keep losing.


Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats on defending a heavily Republican district. Republicans defending less heavily Conservative district should not take any comfort in this outcome. Trump picked this district just because it was suppose to be so safe and the GOP nearly lost it. The fact you have Republicans celebrating this is funny. But congrats anyway

Trump won this district by 1.5%. Handel won by 7%, an improvement from the presidential election. She is no Newt/Price to be winning by 20%. I actually thought Handel would lose because she was a terrible candidate and Dems still couldn't beat her. Liberals are finished in this country.

Edited by Imissbeastmode
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...