Jump to content

Mets fans?


Another Fan

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

Escobar hit a two out solo shot in the 9th and they ended up losing, 9-8. Eight men LOB and they chased all game after getting into a 6-1 hole. Just like I said, a 'woulda, coulda, shoulda' game. It was there for the taking and they pissed it away. Here's a not so fun fact which sums up the day...prior to Escobar's HR, Gary said that the Mets were 42-0 in the last forty-two games where they scored 7 runs. Until today against Atlanta, of course. I fully expect a 5-0 or 6-0 type of loss in the nightcap. Sack up and prove me wrong, Mets.

 

Happy to see the Mets prove us both wrong and manage the split.  I didn't see a whole lot of the games today. Followed the box score on and off at work, listened to the radio on the drive home and then split between radio/tv for the last half of the second game. 

 

On the way home Howie was talking about how Alvarez was looking more and more comfortable at the plate and that at every level Alvarez struggled at first after getting called up. He looked like a genius when Alvarez got the big hit late in the game.

 

I was listening again when Megill was trying to make it through 6. When it came down to facing Rosario with the bases loaded I was fine with Buck leaving him in - even though the obvious move was to pull him after the walk. 

 

Fun fact from the TV broadcast - this was the 25th straight double-header split for the Mets. Never would have guessed that.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

Happy to see the Mets prove us both wrong and manage the split.  I didn't see a whole lot of the games today. Followed the box score on and off at work, listened to the radio on the drive home and then split between radio/tv for the last half of the second game. 

 

On the way home Howie was talking about how Alvarez was looking more and more comfortable at the plate and that at every level Alvarez struggled at first after getting called up. He looked like a genius when Alvarez got the big hit late in the game.

 

I was listening again when Megill was trying to make it through 6. When it came down to facing Rosario with the bases loaded I was fine with Buck leaving him in - even though the obvious move was to pull him after the walk. 

 

Fun fact from the TV broadcast - this was the 25th straight double-header split for the Mets. Never would have guessed that.

 

 

 

Glad they got the split. I watched all of the first game and then decided to save myself any more torture and skipped the second game. The first time I checked my phone they were up 2-0, the second time I checked they were down 3-2, and the third time I checked they were up 4-3 on Alvarez two-bagger and then I saw it was 5-3. A sweep would have been nice (they blew a golden opportunity) but a split is certainly better than nothing. Was that stat actually that it was the 25th straight time that they've at least split a doubleheader? Because I know they've swept some in the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ExWNYer said:

 

Glad they got the split. I watched all of the first game and then decided to save myself any more torture and skipped the second game. The first time I checked my phone they were up 2-0, the second time I checked they were down 3-2, and the third time I checked they were up 4-3 on Alvarez two-bagger and then I saw it was 5-3. A sweep would have been nice (they blew a golden opportunity) but a split is certainly better than nothing. Was that stat actually that it was the 25th straight time that they've at least split a doubleheader? Because I know they've swept some in the last few years.

 

You are correct sir. I must have misheard it.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2023 at 10:36 PM, SinceThe70s said:

 

You are correct sir. I must have misheard it.

 

So it's either ending tonight or extending to 26 straight as they just choked away Game 1 of the doubleheader to a Tigers team that was 10-17 coming into the day. The Mets had a 5-4 lead in the bottom of the 8th and Ottavino gave up a two run, two out single and they lost, 6-5.

 

Again, this team just gives away far too many games against inferior opponents. They have now lost 7 of their last 9 and Nimmo, who struck out on a check swing with the tying run at first to end the game, is in the middle of a 2-21 slump. He needs to turn it around, ASAP. Scherzer goes in the nightcap and Verlander makes his Met debut tomorrow afternoon. They need to take these next two, no excuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

 

So it's either ending tonight or extending to 26 straight as they just choked away Game 1 of the doubleheader to a Tigers team that was 10-17 coming into the day. The Mets had a 5-4 lead in the bottom of the 8th and Ottavino gave up a two run, two out single and they lost, 6-5.

 

Again, this team just gives away far too many games against inferior opponents. They have now lost 7 of their last 9 and Nimmo, who struck out on a check swing with the tying run at first to end the game, is in the middle of a 2-21 slump. He needs to turn it around, ASAP. Scherzer goes in the nightcap and Verlander makes his Met debut tomorrow afternoon. They need to take these next two, no excuses.

 

Scherzer is pitching like this is a playoff game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

Scherzer is pitching like this is a playoff game.

 

 

He looked like complete sh*t. Gave up 5 earned runs on 75 pitches and was yanked after 3 1/3 innings and two men on base with the Mets trailing 5-1. He's looked cooked this year other than his first start against the Padres when he went 5 innings and gave up nothing.  Another "who the hell is he?!" pitcher came in to relieve Scherzer (Zach Muckenhirn) and promptly surrendered an RBI single before getting out of the inning on a double play ball. 6-1 Detroit going to the bottom of the 4th with all 6 earned runs charged to Scherzer who already had a less than stellar 3.72 ERA coming into the game. And the bats are impotent once again. Small payroll or record-breaking payroll, they always become the same old frustrating f'ing Mets.

Edited by ExWNYer
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ExWNYer said:

 

He looked like complete sh*t. Gave up 5 earned runs on 75 pitches and was yanked after 3 1/3 innings and two men on base with the Mets trailing 5-1. He's looked cooked this year other than his first start against the Padres when he went 5 innings and gave up nothing.  Another "who the hell is he?!" pitcher came in to relieve Scherzer (Zach Muckenhirn) and promptly surrendered an RBI single before getting out of the inning on a double play ball. 6-1 Detroit going to the bottom of the 4th with all 6 earned runs charged to Scherzer who already had a less than stellar 3.72 ERA coming into the game. And the bats are impotent once again. Small payroll or record-breaking payroll, they always become the same old frustrating f'ing Mets.

 

What p!sses me off is that this start comes on the heels of a suspension. It's not like he's coming back from an injury.  It's getting beyond tiring praying that our top pitchers can make it through the season. - we've been on that hamster wheel for what 3-4 years? Even worse to watch Max suck when he actually does take the mound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where Buck, Cohen, or someone needs to close the doors tonight and tell the team:

 

The product out there today was a f***ing joke.  You guys gotta get your pansy asses in gear.  You are the laughing stock of Major League Baseball right now.

 

 

I think someone needs to rip into the team to get them focused again. Or have their skin crawl a little with some fear 

Edited by Another Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

What p!sses me off is that this start comes on the heels of a suspension. It's not like he's coming back from an injury.  It's getting beyond tiring praying that our top pitchers can make it through the season. - we've been on that hamster wheel for what 3-4 years? Even worse to watch Max suck when he actually does take the mound.

 

2 hours ago, Another Fan said:

This is where Buck, Cohen, or someone needs to close the doors tonight and tell the team:

 

The product out there today was a f***ing joke.  You guys gotta get your pansy asses in gear.  You are the laughing stock of Major League Baseball right now.

 

 

I think someone needs to rip into the team to get them focused again. Or have their skin crawl a little with some fear 

 

@Gugny

 

Scherzer is now the 'proud' owner of a 5.56 ERA and a 1.41 WHIP. WTF...I thought David Peterson had been demoted to Syracuse but, apparently, he's alive and well and has taken over Max's body. Detroit was hitting nobody coming into this series...and I mean NOBODY...but leave it to the underachieving Mets and their decrepit 'ace' to right the listing Tigers' ship and turn them into the 1927 'Murderers Row' Yankees. Would anyone really be surprised at this point if Verlander's season debut ended in a Motor City Kitty sweep? I wouldn't. 'The Mess' have now lost 8 of their last 10 games with 6 of those 8 losses coming to the Giants, Natalies, & Tigers. Those are the games you're supposed to be taking advantage of to climb the standings.

 

This sh*t show of a staff has allowed more HRs than any other team in the National League. Should be fun when Carrasco and Quintana come riding in on their white horses to help throw gasoline on the tire fire. This team was supposed to be built on its pitching. Helluva build there, Eppler. Another not so fun fact that Gary laid on the viewers during the nightcap was...get this...this year's Mets pitching staff is the WORST at this point in a season since the inaugural season of the franchise in 1962...a team that still holds the MLB record for futility with 120 losses. Good times...

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExWNYer said:

 

 

@Gugny

 

Scherzer is now the 'proud' owner of a 5.56 ERA and a 1.41 WHIP. WTF...I thought David Peterson had been demoted to Syracuse but, apparently, he's alive and well and has taken over Max's body. Detroit was hitting nobody coming into this series...and I mean NOBODY...but leave it to the underachieving Mets and their decrepit 'ace' to right the listing Tigers' ship and turn them into the 1927 'Murderers Row' Yankees. Would anyone really be surprised at this point if Verlander's season debut ended in a Motor City Kitty sweep? I wouldn't. 'The Mess' have now lost 8 of their last 10 games with 6 of those 8 losses coming to the Giants, Natalies, & Tigers. Those are the games you're supposed to be taking advantage of to climb the standings.

 

This sh*t show of a staff has allowed more HRs than any other team in the National League. Should be fun when Carrasco and Quintana come riding in on their white horses to help throw gasoline on the tire fire. This team was supposed to be built on its pitching. Helluva build there, Eppler. Another not so fun fact that Gary laid on the viewers during the nightcap was...get this...this year's Mets pitching staff is the WORST at this point in a season since the inaugural season of the franchise in 1962...a team that still holds the MLB record for futility with 120 losses. Good times...


I hear ya, man. No disagreement from me. 
 

My biggest disappointment is Ottavino. He is f*cking killing us. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

@Gugny@SinceThe70s@Another Fan

 

So Verlander got the first out of the game and then allowed back-to-back HRs. Awesome.


Overall, he pitched very well for his first start of the season. 
 

Bullpen also did their job. 
 

Losing 2-0 to the Tigers is pathetic.

Managing just two hits is even worse. 
Getting swept is downright embarrassing. 
 

Thats the sixth time we’ve been shutout this season already. 
 

A three-game sweep of the Rockies should happen. Gotta right this ship ASAP. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching a documentary on Bob Hurley the famous high school coach the other night.  I know it's a totally different atmosphere and sport but would love to see or know of Buck delivering a speech as in the 1st 3 minutes below.  NSFW

 

 

 

I watched the highlights and could give Nimmo a little bit of a pass because that's very rare that kind of mental mistake like that in the 9th inning.  But the team plays with no passion/fire/has no motivation.  They are just whatever at this point.  Overpaid athletes not worth getting worked up over.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gugny said:


Overall, he pitched very well for his first start of the season. 
 

Bullpen also did their job. 
 

Losing 2-0 to the Tigers is pathetic.

Managing just two hits is even worse. 
Getting swept is downright embarrassing. 
 

Thats the sixth time we’ve been shutout this season already. 
 

A three-game sweep of the Rockies should happen. Gotta right this ship ASAP. 

 

I agree. It was disappointing to see Verlander give up those back-to-back jacks but make no mistake, he is NOT the reason they lost that game. It's just annoying that every starting pitcher on the team is allowing HRs at an alarming rate. The team starting ERA is over 5.5 and the WHIP is pushing 1.5. What is that?!

 

I was griping about the lack of power on this team last year and Eppler did nothing to change anything. They are a 'work out walks and play station-to-station team' and that does not play well over long stretches in today's game. Today they only walked once and struck out 11 times and over the course of the last two games they managed a grand total of 1 run on a combined 8 hits.

 

I don't expect a sweep of the Rockies because A) Colorado has played really well in their series with the Brewers and B) the Mess are 2-9 over their last 11 with 7 of those 9 losses coming against the Giants, Natalies, & Tigers. I know it's baseball and tomorrow can look completely different than today but, until they prove otherwise, I don't trust them to beat the scrub teams they should be beating. They just got swept by the lowly Tigers. One win against Colorado would be a start (albeit a bad one).

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Two points on a Thursday night after getting swept by the Tigers despite starting Scherzer and Verlander in two of the games:

 

When I picked up my kid at HS I was still fixated on Verlander giving up 2 HR's to the first three batters he faced in his Mets debut. My kid said he was the new DeGrom, no run support - love that kid!

 

This opener from a NY Post article sums up my mindset perfectly:

 

It’s getting to that point of the baseball calendar where it is still early enough to remind yourself, and all of your panicky friends, that it is a long season, that there are still 130 games left, that one month is no time to start building basement shelters for protection from the falling sky.

But it’s also deep enough to acknowledge some troubling realities.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Friday night rant about the pitch clock. I still detest that a ball or strike can be called despite a pitch never being thrown, it's utter BS. But in fairness for the most part players have adapted. As a result, games are being played much faster - and I don't like it. I totally get that the constant crotch-grabbing and stepping out by batters and pitchers that resulted in 4 hour games needed to be addressed, a 4 hour game is way too long. But for my taste the 2 1/2  hour game (or less - tonights game was 2 hours 10 minutes) is too short.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SinceThe70s said:

A Friday night rant about the pitch clock. I still detest that a ball or strike can be called despite a pitch never being thrown, it's utter BS. But in fairness for the most part players have adapted. As a result, games are being played much faster - and I don't like it. I totally get that the constant crotch-grabbing and stepping out by batters and pitchers that resulted in 4 hour games needed to be addressed, a 4 hour game is way too long. But for my taste the 2 1/2  hour game (or less - tonights game was 2 hours 10 minutes) is too short.  

 want 

 

 

MLB doesn't care about old coots like you and me despite the fact that we are their core audience. They want these fast moving games in the hopes of reeling in the cellphone-addicted, short attention-spanned, brain-dead youth who would rather watch two hours of TikTok videos than the Great American Pastime.

 

season 13 GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ExWNYer said:

 

MLB doesn't care about old coots like you and me despite the fact that we are their core audience. They want these fast moving games in the hopes of reeling in the cellphone-addicted, short attention-spanned, brain-dead youth who would rather watch two hours of TikTok videos than the Great American Pastime.

 

season 13 GIF

 

I hear ya, but I'm skeptical that folks younger than you and I will be drawn in just cuz the games are shorter.  Off the top of my head I could take this convo in a number of directions. 

 

Keeping it to us old coots - I was looking at ticket prices today and the shortened game length made it less appealing for me to spend on the cost of a ticket and parking for a night out with friends/family. One of my great joys in life is shooting the sh!t with friends/family on a relaxed summer night at the ballpark. JMO, but reducing that time to 2 1/2 hours or less is a step in the wrong direction - but again I acknowledge that the 4 hour game due to crotch-grabbing was worth eliminating.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

I hear ya, but I'm skeptical that folks younger than you and I will be drawn in just cuz the games are shorter.  Off the top of my head I could take this convo in a number of directions. 

 

Keeping it to us old coots - I was looking at ticket prices today and the shortened game length made it less appealing for me to spend on the cost of a ticket and parking for a night out with friends/family. One of my great joys in life is shooting the sh!t with friends/family on a relaxed summer night at the ballpark. JMO, but reducing that time to 2 1/2 hours or less is a step in the wrong direction - but again I acknowledge that the 4 hour game due to crotch-grabbing was worth eliminating.

 

 

 

I agree with you and I don't believe that simply shortening games will draw younger eyeballs either but I think MLB does. The majority of their audience is over 50 and they are desperate to stay relevant for future generations. When we were kids I believe the time of the average game was similar to what we have now (too lazy right now to go look it up) but they didn't seem rushed like they do now. The games started getting bogged down somewhere along the line with batters stepping out of the box to adjust their gloves, crotch, helmet and do whatever other OCD quirks and superstitions they had coupled with managers changing pitchers after every batter. They definitely had to do something but I don't have those answers. This is all definitely a work in progress and will take some getting used to, at least for me.

 

The rule I hate the most is the ghost runner in extra innings. If I or anyone else have watched a game past the ninth inning do they really think we're leaving now?? I don't need the game shortened at that point. I'm invested and want to see it to its conclusion and the cat and mouse that goes along with determining the outcome. I also agree that one of the great joys in life is shooting the sh!t with friends/family at a ballgame. You don't need to pay attention to every second of the game which is part of the charm and beauty and it's a bonding/social event as much as anything else. The smell of the grass, the manicured field, the smell of the concessions, and the buzz of the crowd are magnificent and add to the magic and the ambiance. Baseball is the most beautiful of games, IMO, and I think you either like it and get it or you don't just like soccer for many people. If it weren't for baseball and my beloved, albeit frustrating, Mets the Bills off-season would be interminably longer than it already is. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

 

I agree with you and I don't believe that simply shortening games will draw younger eyeballs either but I think MLB does. The majority of their audience is over 50 and they are desperate to stay relevant for future generations. When we were kids I believe the time of the average game was similar to what we have now (too lazy right now to go look it up) but they didn't seem rushed like they do now. The games started getting bogged down somewhere along the line with batters stepping out of the box to adjust their gloves, crotch, helmet and do whatever other OCD quirks and superstitions they had coupled with managers changing pitchers after every batter. They definitely had to do something but I don't have those answers. This is all definitely a work in progress and will take some getting used to, at least for me.

 

The rule I hate the most is the ghost runner in extra innings. If I or anyone else have watched a game past the ninth inning do they really think we're leaving now?? I don't need the game shortened at that point. I'm invested and want to see it to its conclusion and the cat and mouse that goes along with determining the outcome. I also agree that one of the great joys in life is shooting the sh!t with friends/family at a ballgame. You don't need to pay attention to every second of the game which is part of the charm and beauty and it's a bonding/social event as much as anything else. The smell of the grass, the manicured field, the smell of the concessions, and the buzz of the crowd are magnificent and add to the magic and the ambiance. Baseball is the most beautiful of games, IMO, and I think you either like it and get it or you don't just like soccer for many people. If it weren't for baseball and my beloved, albeit frustrating, Mets the Bills off-season would be interminably longer than it already is. 

 

100%.  A number of years ago I got a midday call from my wife asking if I wanted tix to the game that night. Tix were from a business partner and 10 rows from the batters circle - best seats I've ever had for a Mets game. Next few hours were a mad scramble getting friends on board but we got to the seats shortly after the game started. Seats came with free food (hot dogs and chicken fingers - not filet mignon and lobster) and Syndegaard was on the mound, dominating and working quickly. Beautiful weather too. In the blink of an eye it was the 5th inning and I remember thinking the night was going way too fast.

 

I will say that one rule change I was OK with - and of course they did away with - was the 7 inning doubleheader (as long as it wasn't separate admission). On the other hand, the ghost runner is an abomination.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I googled yesterday's score and saw it was "Mental Health Awareness Day" at Citi Field as well.

 

 

All Mets fans mental health would improve finding other hobbies/interests besides watching this inept team.  

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2023 at 7:26 AM, SinceThe70s said:

 

100%.  A number of years ago I got a midday call from my wife asking if I wanted tix to the game that night. Tix were from a business partner and 10 rows from the batters circle - best seats I've ever had for a Mets game. Next few hours were a mad scramble getting friends on board but we got to the seats shortly after the game started. Seats came with free food (hot dogs and chicken fingers - not filet mignon and lobster) and Syndegaard was on the mound, dominating and working quickly. Beautiful weather too. In the blink of an eye it was the 5th inning and I remember thinking the night was going way too fast.

 

I will say that one rule change I was OK with - and of course they did away with - was the 7 inning doubleheader (as long as it wasn't separate admission). On the other hand, the ghost runner is an abomination.

 

Thanks for sharing. Great story. Believe it or not, I have never seen a Mets home game. My cousin (originally from Jamestown, NY & went to NYU) and her boyfriend live in Brooklyn. She does not care anything at all about sports but, as a lifelong New Yorker, he is a diehard Met fan. He wants me to come up sometime and see the Mets with him so that is on my bucket list.

 

I made a road trip with my brother and some buddies to Pittsburgh to see the Mets play the Pirates in a weekend series at Three Rivers Stadium way back in 1987. I still have the ticket stubs for those games. I think they cost something like $8. They won one of those games, 5-4, on a Keith Hernandez Grand Slam. Rick Aguilera started and got the win and Roger McDowell saved it.

 

My worst Met memory (in person) was a game against the Orioles at Camden Yards (gorgeous ballpark). I went with a co-worker who was also a Met fan (originally from Port Jefferson, L.I.) and his nephew. I remember telling him before he got the tickets, "I hope Steve Trachsel isn't pitching when we go." I despised Trachsel. He made my skin crawl and always seemed to sh*t the bed when pitching for the Mets. He was a bum when they got him and continued to be a bum as a Met. The only other Met pitcher who even comes close to that disdain for me is Doug Sisk. Well, guess who pitched for the Mets that night? Yep...Trachsel. And guess who lost another game for the Mets? Yep...Trachsel. lol FYI...my coolest memory in Camden Yards (non-Mets related) was seeing Ken Griffey, Jr. hit a Grand Slam. I haven't been to a ton of games but I have been fortunate to witness some Grand Slams by some superstars. 

 

The most recent live game I attended was last July in Toronto to see the Jays beat the Tigers. Ex-Met Javy Baez hit a HR in that game for Detroit's only run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

@ExWNYer  @Gugny   @SinceThe70s

 

 

I’ve just been goggling the scores the last week or so.  Feel the team right now isn’t worth getting invested in.

 

I don’t think Cohen has to go the whole Steinbrenner route of having his expectation to be 162-0 each year….  But yeah I wouldn’t mind seeing him nudge the guys a little more publicly.  How I see it is they all have a privilege to be making millions playing the game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Another Fan said:

@ExWNYer  @Gugny   @SinceThe70s

 

 

I’ve just been goggling the scores the last week or so.  Feel the team right now isn’t worth getting invested in.

 

I don’t think Cohen has to go the whole Steinbrenner route of having his expectation to be 162-0 each year….  But yeah I wouldn’t mind seeing him nudge the guys a little more publicly.  How I see it is they all have a privilege to be making millions playing the game 


I am 100% in agreement with you. 
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Another Fan said:

@ExWNYer  @Gugny   @SinceThe70s

 

 

I’ve just been goggling the scores the last week or so.  Feel the team right now isn’t worth getting invested in.

 

I don’t think Cohen has to go the whole Steinbrenner route of having his expectation to be 162-0 each year….  But yeah I wouldn’t mind seeing him nudge the guys a little more publicly.  How I see it is they all have a privilege to be making millions playing the game 

 

To be honest, I've been watching a lot less of the Mets over the past few weeks, mostly due to the poor play and the feeling that losing is inevitable. I'll try to watch tonight to see if Verlander can help right the ship.

 

I don't necessarily feel like Cohen needs to make a public scene - but I was watching the recent game where the Mets got interfered with and without seeing a definitive replay at first told my son that Buck needed to get himself ejected. When he did get thrown out I told my son he needed to go ballistic ala Earl Weaver or Tommy LaSorda but Buck didn't take it to that extreme.  But I don't see the need for Cohen to throw gas on the fire, it won't make Pedersen any better and I prefer when owner leave the day-to-day to the sports people. 

 

BTW, can you imagine if the Mets signed Correa and he got off to the same poor start he's having?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2023 at 9:05 AM, Another Fan said:

@ExWNYer  @Gugny   @SinceThe70s

 

 

I’ve just been goggling the scores the last week or so.  Feel the team right now isn’t worth getting invested in.

 

I don’t think Cohen has to go the whole Steinbrenner route of having his expectation to be 162-0 each year….  But yeah I wouldn’t mind seeing him nudge the guys a little more publicly.  How I see it is they all have a privilege to be making millions playing the game 

 

On 5/16/2023 at 9:09 AM, Gugny said:


I am 100% in agreement with you. 
 

 

On 5/16/2023 at 3:45 PM, SinceThe70s said:

 

To be honest, I've been watching a lot less of the Mets over the past few weeks, mostly due to the poor play and the feeling that losing is inevitable. I'll try to watch tonight to see if Verlander can help right the ship.

 

I don't necessarily feel like Cohen needs to make a public scene - but I was watching the recent game where the Mets got interfered with and without seeing a definitive replay at first told my son that Buck needed to get himself ejected. When he did get thrown out I told my son he needed to go ballistic ala Earl Weaver or Tommy LaSorda but Buck didn't take it to that extreme.  But I don't see the need for Cohen to throw gas on the fire, it won't make Pedersen any better and I prefer when owner leave the day-to-day to the sports people. 

 

BTW, can you imagine if the Mets signed Correa and he got off to the same poor start he's having?  

 

I think we're pretty much all in agreement. This year has been a huge disappointment and I have been following them cursorily the last few weeks, even turning off the alerts on my phone. The 101 win regular season in 2022 was a fun ride but, starting with the playoffs last year and into this season, it's been 'Same old f*cking Mets' ever since. If I were Cohen, I'd be less than thrilled with the front office and the HALF A BILLION dollar turd that Billy 'In-EPP-tler' and his cronies have assembled. It's been encouraging to see Baty, Alvarez, & Vientos but I want to see that type of encouragement on an expected 'also ran' not on an expected World Series contender. I keep telling myself that the Natalies were like 19-31 in 2019 before they went on their run and won the World Series but I just don't see that turnaround happening with this Mets squad. There is talent on the roster, obviously, but they seem more like a mismatched band whose whole is less than the sum of its parts. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see it happening. The pitching has been beyond horrendous. I told my younger Met fan son the other day, "I'm done with Peterson. I don't care if they demote him to Syracuse, trade him for a roll of tape to a team desperate to try & resurrect a lefty, or outright DFA him but he CANNOT be out there for the big club every 5th day." I have been a Peterson supporter since he was drafted but he has majorly regressed and doesn't seem like he'll ever work out in NY. He needs a change of scenery or an entirely new career. Bye, Felicia.

 

So, I tuned in last night in the bottom of the 7th when they were down, 2-0, just to check on the tire fire and actually stuck around to see probably their most entertaining win of the season. Senga was already gone and had done an admirable job of holding Tampa Bay to just one run thru six innings. Vientos (7th), Alvarez (9th), & Alonso (10th) all went yard (a true Mets rarity) to overcome three different late inning, multi-run deficits. That was not enough to get me fully invested again but they are on MLB Network this afternoon and last night was at least enough to whet my appetite and see if the bats are finally awakening or if that outburst was just an offensive anomaly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Gugny @SinceThe70s @Another Fan

 

Only two runs allowed in six solid innings by Megill and the bullpen did the rest. Alonso with HR #16 and the offense did just enough as the Mets won it, 3-2, to take the rubber game. Nice series against the best team in baseball. Oddly, that was only their 18th home game and they are headed back out on to the road. Let's see if these two games have started to right the ship.

 

Note: Complaint of the day (even though they won). Buck irritates me sometimes. After sparking the offense last night with a HR each and a combined 5 RBI out of the team total of 8, both Vientos and Alvarez were on the bench today. They are young and need to play and there is something to be said for playing the 'hot hand'. I'm assuming that Buck was 'playing the percentages' in sitting them against a righty SP but I'd take my chances with them over the underwhelming lefty and switch-hitting bats of Vogelbach and Escobar, respectively.

 

LGM

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

 

 

 

I think we're pretty much all in agreement. This year has been a huge disappointment and I have been following them cursorily the last few weeks, even turning off the alerts on my phone. The 101 win regular season in 2022 was a fun ride but, starting with the playoffs last year and into this season, it's been 'Same old f*cking Mets' ever since. If I were Cohen, I'd be less than thrilled with the front office and the HALF A BILLION dollar turd that Billy 'In-EPP-tler' and his cronies have assembled. It's been encouraging to see Baty, Alvarez, & Vientos but I want to see that type of encouragement on an expected 'also ran' not on an expected World Series contender. I keep telling myself that the Natalies were like 19-31 in 2019 before they went on their run and won the World Series but I just don't see that turnaround happening with this Mets squad. There is talent on the roster, obviously, but they seem more like a mismatched band whose whole is less than the sum of its parts. I hope I'm wrong but I just don't see it happening. The pitching has been beyond horrendous. I told my younger Met fan son the other day, "I'm done with Peterson. I don't care if they demote him to Syracuse, trade him for a roll of tape to a team desperate to try & resurrect a lefty, or outright DFA him but he CANNOT be out there for the big club every 5th day." I have been a Peterson supporter since he was drafted but he has majorly regressed and doesn't seem like he'll ever work out in NY. He needs a change of scenery or an entirely new career. Bye, Felicia.

 

So, I tuned in last night in the bottom of the 7th when they were down, 2-0, just to check on the tire fire and actually stuck around to see probably their most entertaining win of the season. Senga was already gone and had done an admirable job of holding Tampa Bay to just one run thru six innings. Vientos (7th), Alvarez (9th), & Alonso (10th) all went yard (a true Mets rarity) to overcome three different late inning, multi-run deficits. That was not enough to get me fully invested again but they are on MLB Network this afternoon and last night was at least enough to whet my appetite and see if the bats are finally awakening or if that outburst was just an offensive anomaly.

 

Last night was another night where I was half-interested but this time circumstances beyond my control prevented me from seeing any of the good stuff. As I was waiting outside the HS to pick up my son I heard the Vientos HR on the radio. Got home and had the game on while I was doing other stuff and when they got the first runner on in the 9th I had a good feeling (I'm an eternal optimistic) - just in time to get a call that we had to run over to my in-laws to help my father-in-law who had taken a fall and couldn't get up. Got that situation under control just in time to to get a text from my college kid asking if we saw the ending. I assumed it was a 9th inning comeback - found out later the full scope. Missed the game today as I was driving south  for the end of semester pick up.

 

First series win since forever. Despite my optimism this just feels like a lost year. But if I put on my happy hat: Senga was outstanding last night, Verlander had a bad outing but looked very good in his other starts, Quintana may be coming back soon, looks like Megill had a good outing and we can hope (dream?) that Scherzer returns to some semblance of his dominant self. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

Last night was another night where I was half-interested but this time circumstances beyond my control prevented me from seeing any of the good stuff. As I was waiting outside the HS to pick up my son I heard the Vientos HR on the radio. Got home and had the game on while I was doing other stuff and when they got the first runner on in the 9th I had a good feeling (I'm an eternal optimistic) - just in time to get a call that we had to run over to my in-laws to help my father-in-law who had taken a fall and couldn't get up. Got that situation under control just in time to to get a text from my college kid asking if we saw the ending. I assumed it was a 9th inning comeback - found out later the full scope. Missed the game today as I was driving south  for the end of semester pick up.

 

First series win since forever. Despite my optimism this just feels like a lost year. But if I put on my happy hat: Senga was outstanding last night, Verlander had a bad outing but looked very good in his other starts, Quintana may be coming back soon, looks like Megill had a good outing and we can hope (dream?) that Scherzer returns to some semblance of his dominant self. 

 

Glad your father-in-law is okay. That's scary. That said, I think it's obvious what you need to do to get this team untracked...and, deep down, you know what you have to do, as well. Go to your in-laws before each game and gently push your father-in-law to the floor. Just be sure to help him up before you leave. LGM! :devil: ❤️

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

 

Glad your father-in-law is okay. That's scary. That said, I think it's obvious what you need to do to get this team untracked...and, deep down, you know what you have to do, as well. Go to your in-laws before each game and gently push your father-in-law to the floor. Just be sure to help him up before you leave. LGM! :devil: ❤️

 

For the record I pushed my FIL down a flight of steps after Pete didn't run out the ball to short. Happy with the end result for the Mets but this isn't sustainable for the Mets or my marital bliss.

 

On a more serious note, got my kid home from college and we were watching the game tonight. I lost it when Pete didn't run out the ground ball...but then told him that Pete would have a big hit. As an eternal optimist that might have been the blind squirrel finding the nut. I think we are coming out of the rut of the past month and we'll see much much better baseball out of the Mets going forward - but it still feels like winning a WS this year is a pipe dream.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2023 at 10:54 PM, SinceThe70s said:

 

For the record I pushed my FIL down a flight of steps after Pete didn't run out the ball to short. Happy with the end result for the Mets but this isn't sustainable for the Mets or my marital bliss.

 

On a more serious note, got my kid home from college and we were watching the game tonight. I lost it when Pete didn't run out the ground ball...but then told him that Pete would have a big hit. As an eternal optimist that might have been the blind squirrel finding the nut. I think we are coming out of the rut of the past month and we'll see much much better baseball out of the Mets going forward - but it still feels like winning a WS this year is a pipe dream.

 

They have played some exciting games during this five game winning streak but I agree that it's more than likely not sustainable. Ottavino and Robertson (more surprisingly) couldn't hold leads and were actually bailed out by the offense. The increase in HRs has been a welcomed addition but, again, is it sustainable? They are a mostly power deficient team but the 'Baby Mets' have helped in that department for sure. Baty has looked like a pro for most of his time up and Alvarez is blossoming into a real life catcher with offensive chops right before our eyes. I love Vientos potential, too. I'm still irritated that Buck won't take the reins off and is treating them with kid gloves. This current resurgence is due in large part to them (with some Polar Bear magic sprinkled in to the mix) and playing them every other day is just asinine. PLAY. THEM. BUCK.

 

BTW, the split doubleheader sweep on Sunday was a nice present for my younger son's 21st birthday. He shares the same birthday with Josh Allen! :beer:   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Gugny @ExWNYer @SinceThe70s

 

Just something I noticed.  Yeah 27-26 isn't impressive but it looks like the team is only 1/2 game out of the 2nd wildcard.  

 

The NL seems very tight overall if that's the right word.   Dodgers have the best record at 32-21 and Cubs have worst record at 22-29.  There's only really 9 games between the worst and best teams record wise right now 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Another Fan said:

@Gugny @ExWNYer @SinceThe70s

 

Just something I noticed.  Yeah 27-26 isn't impressive but it looks like the team is only 1/2 game out of the 2nd wildcard.  

 

The NL seems very tight overall if that's the right word.   Dodgers have the best record at 32-21 and Cubs have worst record at 22-29.  There's only really 9 games between the worst and best teams record wise right now 

 

@Gugny @SinceThe70s

 

All of this is true (27-27 now) but the question is...does this team really look like one capable of making a deep playoff run and a World Series appearance? Not to me, not at the moment anyway.  They are a weird hybrid/mishmash of highly overpaid and underachieving vets & inexperienced newbies.

 

I'm thoroughly enjoying watching Brandon Nimmo, the growth of Baty & Alvarez (looks like they finally have a legit catcher), and 'The Pete Alonso Experience' which has been amazing to witness...but that's it. The fun ends there. Buck continues to piss me off over his under use of the kids. Why the hell did they call up Vientos if they're not going to let him play?? He might as well be in Syracuse getting the ABs and experience in the field. The pitching staff from Scherzer & Verlander to the other barely warm bodies has been inconsistent at best and horrible at worst. This team went to Colorado and put up 7 runs and 10 runs in back-to-back games and still managed to find a way to lose them both. I'm not worried about them missing the playoffs. What worries me is that they'll flip one of these exciting kids at the deadline...like Vientos or Mauricio...just for a Darin Ruf level rental who will needlessly be added as they fall short yet again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Another Fan said:

@Gugny @ExWNYer @SinceThe70s

 

Just something I noticed.  Yeah 27-26 isn't impressive but it looks like the team is only 1/2 game out of the 2nd wildcard.  

 

The NL seems very tight overall if that's the right word.   Dodgers have the best record at 32-21 and Cubs have worst record at 22-29.  There's only really 9 games between the worst and best teams record wise right now 

 

WRT fighting for a wild card spot - for sure that's in play. Problem for me is that the Mets are kind of like the Bills in that expectations are higher than just making the playoffs and this doesn't look like a championship team to me. That could all change - look no further than the run the Phillies made last year after a poor start - but that feels like optimism over realism.

 

In the mean time I am excited about seeing how the kids make their way into the lineup. Alvarez looks like a stud, Baty looks like he belongs and Vientos looks like a guy who could force himself into a spot given the opportunity. Meanwhile Mauricio looks ready for his shot at the majors. I'm expecting him to come up at some point to play second with McNeil moving to the OF. That could improve the lineup and give us a real backup at SS. Guys like Canha, Escobar, Vogelbach and Nido are going to start getting squeezed out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ExWNYer said:

 

@Gugny @SinceThe70s

 

All of this is true (27-27 now) but the question is...does this team really look like one capable of making a deep playoff run and a World Series appearance? Not to me, not at the moment anyway.  They are a weird hybrid/mishmash of highly overpaid and underachieving vets & inexperienced newbies.

 

I'm thoroughly enjoying watching Brandon Nimmo, the growth of Baty & Alvarez (looks like they finally have a legit catcher), and 'The Pete Alonso Experience' which has been amazing to witness...but that's it. The fun ends there. Buck continues to piss me off over his under use of the kids. Why the hell did they call up Vientos if they're not going to let him play?? He might as well be in Syracuse getting the ABs and experience in the field. The pitching staff from Scherzer & Verlander to the other barely warm bodies has been inconsistent at best and horrible at worst. This team went to Colorado and put up 7 runs and 10 runs in back-to-back games and still managed to find a way to lose them both. I'm not worried about them missing the playoffs. What worries me is that they'll flip one of these exciting kids at the deadline...like Vientos or Mauricio...just for a Darin Ruf level rental who will needlessly be added as they fall short yet again.

 

That would be horrifying. I don't think they'd do it for a Ruf-type but I could see it happen for a closer - but I'm with you, I'd hold onto the younguns.

 

As much as I don't like the history of the Mets playing guys out of position I don't think McNeil in LF is an issue. That guy can flat out play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

That would be horrifying. I don't think they'd do it for a Ruf-type but I could see it happen for a closer - but I'm with you, I'd hold onto the younguns.

 

As much as I don't like the history of the Mets playing guys out of position I don't think McNeil in LF is an issue. That guy can flat out play.

 

I like McNeil and think he's a more than serviceable outfielder. He's the gritty Wally Backman-type that every team needs. My Darin Ruf example may have been a little hyperbole but I still stand by the sentiment. I don't want them flipping assets who could be core pieces down the line, even for a closer. Diaz will be the closer again next year and Robertson is more than capable of handling the job this year, if the starters start holding up their end of the bargain and saving the bullpen from all of the wear and tear they're currently enduring. Robertson's hiccups, like the rest of the backend guys, have been due to overuse, IMO. I don't believe this is their year regardless of what they do at the deadline and I don't want them sacrificing the future for 'the now'. That has happened way too often with this franchise and year after year they add stop gaps like Ruf, Vogelbach, & Pham. Enough already. Address the DH position and add some real, sustainable power in the offseason. And let's get some reliable starting pitchers who aren't 105 years old and injury prone.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

@Gugny @ExWNYer @Another Fan

 

This morning I saw that DeGrom was being put on the (retroactive) 60 day IL. Since then it came out that he has a UCL injury, might need TJ surgery and in his own words "I want to get it fixed and will set a goal to be back before the end of next year". 

 

I'm not dancing on the grave here, I really feel bad for Jake. At the same time I'll admit that I'm happy that we're not on the hook for the contract - and another 2 years waiting and hoping he'll get back to being the dominant pitcher he was in the past.

 

The Rangers signed him to a 5 year deal and in all likelihood will get next to nothing out of the first two years and who knows what to expect after that.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SinceThe70s said:

@Gugny @ExWNYer @Another Fan

 

This morning I saw that DeGrom was being put on the (retroactive) 60 day IL. Since then it came out that he has a UCL injury, might need TJ surgery and in his own words "I want to get it fixed and will set a goal to be back before the end of next year". 

 

I'm not dancing on the grave here, I really feel bad for Jake. At the same time I'll admit that I'm happy that we're not on the hook for the contract - and another 2 years waiting and hoping he'll get back to being the dominant pitcher he was in the past.

 

The Rangers signed him to a 5 year deal and in all likelihood will get next to nothing out of the first two years and who knows what to expect after that.


I would have been pissed if the Mets paid him what Texas did. 
 

That said, Texas’ GM should be fired. 
 

Anyone with a functioning brain knew this was gonna happen. 
 

6’4”, 180 lbs., throwing 100+ MPH on a  consistent basis is never gonna end well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...