Jump to content

Flynn: immunity probably means you committed a crime


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The right wingers are wack jobs but you're the one defending a pedophile:

 

 

The girl was not under the age of 15, as the initial reports said, but nearly 17 when she first reached out to Weiner, the report said. She and her family were also not Clinton supporters, as the girl claimed in a letter published by BuzzFeed, according to social media posts unearthed by the website.

“Seeing that Weiner is both a repeat offender — his sexting addiction cost him his job in Congress as well as a shot at becoming mayor of New York — and associated with one of the most important people in Clinton’s inner circle, it is conceivable that this was a set-up from the beginning, with the objective of embarrassing the Clinton campaign,” the report reads.

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/334511-report-girl-in-weiner-sexting-case-lied-to-damage-clinton

 

 

 

In Gator's partisan world, it's okay to sext a 15 year old if she's almost 16...

 

... So long as you're a democrat.

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The right wingers are wack jobs but you're the one defending a pedophile:

 

 

 

In Gator's partisan world, it's okay to sext a 15 year old if she's almost 16...

 

... So long as you're a democrat.

 

At this point, Hillary could come straight out and say "Yes, I had Vince Foster killed," and her supporters would say "Republicans are on a witch hunt...it was almost a suicide..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Flynn's words coming back to bite him in the ass.

can you explain that or did you just quote don lemon?

 

gtfo you hack

The right wingers are wack jobs but you're the one defending a pedophile:

 

 

 

In Gator's partisan world, it's okay to sext a 15 year old if she's almost 16...

 

... So long as you're a democrat.

ephebophile, you imbecile

 

ephebophiles are 15-19

hebephiles are 11-14

pedophiles are x-11

 

debates are how low pedophiles go. all are classed as psychological disorders

 

anthony weiner is not a pedophile. yuge difference. this entire story is really pissing me off, honestly.

Edited by Boyst62
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The right wingers are wack jobs but you're the one defending a pedophile:

 

 

 

In Gator's partisan world, it's okay to sext a 15 year old if she's almost 16...

 

... So long as you're a democrat.

Like 48 weeks are the same as 52?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ok, he's a Republican. He could basically come out and say he was working for Putin and you partisan right wing wack jobs would say it's ok.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/michael-flynn-fifth-amendment-russia-senate.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ok, he's a Republican. He could basically come out and say he was working for Putin and you partisan right wing wack jobs would say it's ok.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/michael-flynn-fifth-amendment-russia-senate.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

 

Oh yes. We absolutely would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ok, he's a Republican. He could basically come out and say he was working for Putin and you partisan right wing wack jobs would say it's ok.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/michael-flynn-fifth-amendment-russia-senate.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

 

Like your people did with the Clintons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone hear how Russia got 20% of our uranium?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

 

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Continue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone hear how Russia got 20% of our uranium?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

 

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Continue

If she became President would you people want that investigated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ok, he's a Republican. He could basically come out and say he was working for Putin and you partisan right wing wack jobs would say it's ok.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/us/politics/michael-flynn-fifth-amendment-russia-senate.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

 

If a Republican wanted to work for a commie why wouldn't he just become a democrat? Why bother with all the foreign intrigue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...