Mark VI Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Go Montana! 257715[/snapback] Don't they play in the 1-AA Pie in the Sky Conference ? Quick, call Jamie Nails ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 As of midnight, you are absolutely correct! 257717[/snapback] I stand corrected. According to the Bills depth chart, as of midnight the multi-faceted Jason Peters is our #1 LT! http://buffalobills.com/team/depthchart.jsp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Why don't we just draft a left-handed quarterback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 I personally am just fine with letting Travis ride the damn bench this year rather then giving him up for a 7th rounder...... He wants to screw us.....screw him right back. Lets see what his worth is after sitting on the bench for 2 years 257692[/snapback] John, the Bills could save approx. 1,25 million by cutting his dumb, disloyal ass. This could help us get a much needed OG, etc. Travis for Shelton (straight up) was a pipe dream anyway. Now, perhaps a few more posters can see what a stupid scumbag this guy is. Watch, his career is all but over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Oh, poop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolly Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 I personally am just fine with letting Travis ride the damn bench this year rather then giving him up for a 7th rounder...... He wants to screw us.....screw him right back. Lets see what his worth is after sitting on the bench for 2 years 257692[/snapback] Ya, thats a great idea. Let's sit him another year so he ends up with little to no value for us which wil screw us in return, again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Now? My opinion of him has been the same for quite some time. He's not a team player, and he's not someone I want on this team. I'm not alone in my opinion. 257711[/snapback] BFII, you are FAR closer to being alone on this issue than you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 How exactly is Travis screwing the Bills by having the Cardinals like some rookie running backs and wanting to sign an extension with the other team he is traded to, which was always the case? Who is going to trade anything of value for a one year player? It was always expected that Henry would sign an extension with the other team, that is why the Bills let his agent try to work out a deal with another team. Henry hasn't done a thing wrong in this particular issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 This report doesn't sound right to me. Travis doesn't have the right to refuse the trade and if the Cardinals are not wanting to give him a multiyear deal then I don't see the problem...usually its the other way around, the team wants a multiyear deal but the player wants to be able to test free agency early so they won't sign a long term deal. I also can't believe the Cards would want to trade a LT for a guy with one year on his contract without locking him up long term. Why do I have the feeling that this report got it backwards and its Henry that doesn't want the extension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 This report doesn't sound right to me. Travis doesn't have the right to refuse the trade and if the Cardinals are not wanting to give him a multiyear deal then I don't see the problem...usually its the other way around, the team wants a multiyear deal but the player wants to be able to test free agency early so they won't sign a long term deal. I also can't believe the Cards would want to trade a LT for a guy with one year on his contract without locking him up long term. Why do I have the feeling that this report got it backwards and its Henry that doesn't want the extension. 257755[/snapback] Clayton is just piggy backing off the story in the Miami Herald that was originally referenced in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltrane34 Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Just let Bannon Play both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Clayton is just piggy backing off the story in the Miami Herald that was originally referenced in this thread. 257757[/snapback] From the Herald... The Miami Herald reports the proposed deal between Buffalo and Arizona which would exchange disgruntled Bills RB Travis Henry for Cardinals OLT L.J. Shelton is currently being held up. Agent Hadley Engelhard is working on a new contract for Henry, but the Cardinals want Henry to play out the final year of his contract before redoing the deal. That really seems like a ridiculous report. So exactly who is Hadley Englehard "working on a deal" with if the Cardinals want Travis to play out the final year of his contract. There is no deal, just the trade. And if the Cards just want Henry to play out the final year of his contract, they would make the trade today. Is Henry going to not play his heart out to get the big payday in 2006 from the Cards or any of the other 31 teams as a UFA after a good 2005? Travis and the Cards are in the exact same position whether Henry wants to sign an extension now or not. The Bills can trade him, he'll start, and he'll either be wanted back or sent packing depending on his production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Just let Bannon Play both ways. 257762[/snapback] Bannan's gay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Bannan's gay? 257775[/snapback] No, (for all the Seinfans) Bannan plays on our team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Must be that three-point stance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie68 Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 I think this is just a leak from the agent - he's trying to keep interest stirred up on TH and would rather have a contact now so he gets his commission now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Travis SUCKS! DOOOOMED hahahahahahahahahahah mwhahahahahaha bwhahaaaaaaaaaa Come one people, let this thing play out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Ya, thats a great idea. Let's sit him another year so he ends up with little to no value for us which wil screw us in return, again. 257744[/snapback] As opposed to trading him for like a 7th rounder who will probably be cut anyway? The whole Henry thing has gone completely sour......I got an idea lets PAY someone to take him off of our hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BF_in_Indiana Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 BFII, you are FAR closer to being alone on this issue than you think. 257748[/snapback] You might be right, there are still many who feel we can get a Pro Bowler for this guy. He's a mentally challenged trouble maker who could care less about the team and we need to unload him for a box of jock straps if we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 You might be right, there are still many who feel we can get a Pro Bowler for this guy. He's a mentally challenged trouble maker who could care less about the team and we need to unload him for a box of jock straps if we can. 257814[/snapback] Who has been more loyal, seriously, the Bills to Travis or Travis to the Bills? If anything, Travis has been more loyal to the team than they have to him. He was signed to a fair but fairly low contract. He was given a very low extension when he needed and asked for it, which was hardly generous. He played his ass off, performed better than expected, made the pro bowl and was rewarded with Willis McGahee. Granted, Travis has also been a pain in the ass, a fumbler, a whiner, an off the field nuisance, and injuyy prone. His time as a Bill is over completely. But he worked his ass off for the most part on the Bills and the team voted him MVP and the Bills were no more loyal to him than he was to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts