YoloinOhio Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 @seniorbowlphil Nate fits West Coast offensive system better than some of the guys rated above him, needs to get to right team. Quick eyes, arm and feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 @seniorbowlphil Nate fits West Coast offensive system better than some of the guys rated above him, needs to get to right team. Quick eyes, arm and feet. I`ll take Webb over him all day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 @seniorbowlphil Nate fits West Coast offensive system better than some of the guys rated above him, needs to get to right team. Quick eyes, arm and feet. I'd take him in the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I'd take him in the 2nd. Nassib light for all you past followers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Nassib light for all you past followers. I'm sure they have differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I'm sure they have differences. Same boat . One has a weaker arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Same boat . One has a weaker arm. I'm more concerned about the mental aspect and vision where he's very strong. We're not running a vertical offense where arm is as important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I'm more concerned about the mental aspect and vision where he's very strong. We're not running a vertical offense where arm is as important. Yeah ,short memory of a recent QB ,who could not throw the deep ball. So they just played up on us ,more in the box. Gotta have arm strength in Buff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Yeah ,short memory of a recent QB ,who could not throw the deep ball. So they just played up on us ,more in the box. Gotta have arm strength in Buff. Fitz wasn't accurate, that's what his biggest problem was. Any NFL QB can't throw it at least 50 yards in the air, where it's placed is the important part. Â Pittsburgh has pretty harsh weather as well.... Â Excellent deep ball accuracy completing 46.2 percent of his deep throws. http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2017/03/nfl_draft_2017_meet_the_qb_that_ron_jaworski_says.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 The great thing about Peterman is it will allow McDermott to draft based on needs for his defense while giving fans a warm body, like Tuel, that they can talk about at training camp. Â Bills can punt the ball again on QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyC81 Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 My favorite Peterman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 (edited) @seniorbowlphil Nate fits West Coast offensive system better than some of the guys rated above him, needs to get to right team. Quick eyes, arm and feet. I've watched game film of 4 QBs so far this season. I've still got to go watch Kizer who I wrote off after seeing him play live (briefly). But I like Peterman better than Trubisky, Mahomes and Watson. His arm strength is certainly a question and I think he fits a WC or other offense with mostly quick throws much more so than Buffalo's vertical passing game, but he's the only one I really like above the shoulders. He's definitely not Derek Carr, he is more Andy Dalton. Edited to add: Just watched Kizer's game against Stanford. I didn't think there was any way he could've been as bad as I remembered. He is. He's just abysmal. Tons of physical ability, but zero feel for the game. Its incomprehensible that he could have that much talent and be so bad. Edited April 7, 2017 by BarleyNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 He's got as good a chance as any in this class, I think. I'd take him in the 4th or later. Â He's got good feet and pocket movement. Seems like a good leader and competitor. I question his accuracy, decision making, and ball protection, though. Would the Bills be committed enough to develop him properly? Probably not. Â I'd rather they not waste a pick on any QB this year. They'll most likely be in position to take a guy like Josh Allen or Luke Falk next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I've watched game film of 4 QBs so far this season. I've still got to go watch Kizer who I wrote off after seeing him play live (briefly). But I like Peterman better than Trubisky, Mahomes and Watson. His arm strength is certainly a question and I think he fits a WC or other offense with mostly quick throws much more so than Buffalo's vertical passing game, but he's the only one I really like above the shoulders. He's definitely not Derek Carr, he is more Andy Dalton. NFL.com's draft profile has his pro comp as Kirk Cousins. You like that!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 NFL.com's draft profile has his pro comp as Kirk Cousins. You like that!?!?! Cousins has a good arm. Peterman does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Cousins has a good arm. Peterman does not. Makes you wonder who the f these sites employ, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffismagic Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Makes you wonder who the f these sites employ, eh? Yes, the standards are pretty low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 NFL.com's draft profile has his pro comp as Kirk Cousins. You like that!?!?! That's a good comp too. He'll, yes, I like that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I'd take him in the 2nd. I think i would too...Got more experience than the rest of the QBs in a pro style offense...looks like a solid backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 Bills are bringing him in for a pre-draft visit. Matt Miller's latest mock have the Bills selecting him at 44. Thoughts on him for Dennison offense? NFL.com Draft profile here - comparison to Derek Carr http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/nathan-peterman?id=2558191 It says Kirk Cousins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts