Jump to content

The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency

Nanker

By Nanker
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

 Share

Recommended Posts

Koko78 All Pro

Koko78

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I'm a news junkie, I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? 

 

Apparently not.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 11.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino
GG
GG

Answering these properly takes time and that’s why you don’t see an immediate response.    I won’t go point by point, because you’ve hit on many overlapping topics where the perceived conce

Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino

Here's the full (I think?) monologue   

Posted Images

3rdnlng Hall of Famer

3rdnlng

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I'm a news junkie and I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? 

Maybe you were just high every time someone said that 17 different agencies were in agreement with the assessment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deranged Rhino Hall of Famer

Deranged Rhino

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I'm a news junkie, I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? 

 

For 7 months they touted "All 17 intel agencies agree" with the ICA report released January 6th, 2017... 

 

Then issued this retraction... 7 months later. 

Quote


A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

 

http://archive.is/ndda2#selection-215.0-219.532

 

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

For 7 months they touted "All 17 intel agencies agree" with the ICA report released January 6th, 2017... 

 

Then issued this retraction... 7 months later. 

http://archive.is/ndda2#selection-215.0-219.532

 

Try again.

Ok, the Drug Enforcement Agency didn't conclude that and neither did the Coast Guard Agency, but while the report is not entirely on target, it was still correct. 

 

The main agencies did make the assessment CIA and FBI among others. 

 

So the right wing propaganda machine is splitting hairs and crying bias. They are not being honest. 

14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Maybe you were just high every time someone said that 17 different agencies were in agreement with the assessment.

Back to being worthless again? 

 

You add nothing. Board Troll you are 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deranged Rhino Hall of Famer

Deranged Rhino

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Really?  No one thought to quote him directly referencing an IC "consensus"?

 

That required digging through his old stupidity and I didn't have the stomach for it. :lol:

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ok, the Drug Enforcement Agency didn't conclude that and neither did the Coast Guard Agency, but while the report is not entirely on target, it was still correct. 

 

No, your statement is proven to be false. The one where you said you never remembered the Times reporting something they clearly did (for seven months).

 

You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Koko78 All Pro

Koko78

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end.

 

That's why I wasn't going to do the work for him. We all know he was just going to dismiss it out of hand and claim more convenient memory lapses.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That required digging through his old stupidity and I didn't have the stomach for it. :lol:

 

No, your statement is proven to be false. The one where you said you never remembered the Times reporting something they clearly did (for seven months).

 

You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end.

Actually you are wrong. Koko said the Steele dossier, not the intelligence report on Russian interference. You guys are getting your propaganda points mixed up. Which is actually funny 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deranged Rhino Hall of Famer

Deranged Rhino

Posted
Posted

Dumbass, the Steele dossier was covered in the ICA. If "all 17 intel agencies" signed off on the ICA like the Times said (and lied about), they also signed off on all the material included in the ICA which the Steele dossier was. 

 

It helps to read before you expound. A lesson I still hope you'll learn one day.

 

You're wrong. 

 

But that's not breaking news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiberius Hall of Famer

Tiberius

Posted
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Dumbass, the Steele dossier was covered in the ICA. If "all 17 intel agencies" signed off on the ICA like the Times said (and lied about), they also signed off on all the material included in the ICA which the Steele dossier was. 

 

It helps to read before you expound. A lesson I still hope you'll learn one day.

Not true at all! That is total Bull Sh it and you know it. 

 

 

Try again! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deranged Rhino Hall of Famer

Deranged Rhino

Posted
Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Op ed :huh:  Really? 

 

I know you won't read the primary source material that makes it clear. I skipped a step for you. 

 

The ICA, by Clapper and Brennan's own testimony, was based in part on the Steele dossier and its "merit" (which we now know was never established). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
row_33 Hall of Famer

row_33

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

I think she enjoys laying the smack down on those “so called” hateful journalists.

 

Spicer ran from it, she hits back.

 

you couldn't design a more perfect and effective person to do this job better than her

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B-Man Hall of Famer

B-Man

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is CNN................................

 

 

Quote

f053ce187d9fe1393f4684ca92c89d74_bigger.Brian Stelter‏Verified account @brianstelter

FollowFollow @brianstelter
A source familiar with the president's thinking tells @GloriaBorger that Trump is "pissed, flailing and upset..." More upset than ever... His anger is "beyond what anyone can imagine."

 

 
 
Wow this is as shocking as the last time someone reported this,
 
which was just yesterday
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that …
 
.
Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
njbuff All Pro

njbuff

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, B-Man said:

This is CNN................................

 

 

 
 
Wow this is as shocking as the last time someone reported this,
 
which was just yesterday
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that
 
and the day before that …
 
.

 

That little George Costanza is this most disengenuous pricks imaginable in MSM today. And an ultra-annoying voice to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...