MAJBobby Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) It's all over the news how it's Lynn's job to lose. There won't be a search, just going through the motions. Whaley has a guy he knows will do whatever he wants. Anyone that wants to bet against that let me know. It's a done dealSure it is. Thanks for the inside knowledge Football guy? Your kidding me rightIs Whaley NOT a football guy. Ooo yeah Nevermind Ill believe it when i see it. They have been trying to deliver this message for several yearsBut they really havent Edited January 1, 2017 by MAJBobby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boater Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 why the hell are the Pegulas even involved they left us with Rex. Terry really needs to fix this mess Please tell me this is sarcasm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 First things first. Extending EJ after this half of "football" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 First things first. Extending EJ after this half of "football" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 The level of cluelessness is astounding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 why the hell are the Pegulas even involved they left us with Rex. Terry really needs to fix this mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 The level of cluelessness is astounding. At OBD? Correct. About time you got something right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 But, but, but... He said "don't let him leave the building" last time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 But, but, but... He said "don't let him leave the building" last time... As I've said, perhaps the most taken out of context comment ever. But I get why that appeals to the clueless who look to the Sully's of the world for validation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 As I've said, perhaps the most taken out of context comment ever. But I get why that appeals to the clueless who look to the Sully's of the world for validation. Yes, when reading the entire story it's clear what happened. And in actuality this quote doesn't matter either--people will believe what they want to believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 Yes, when reading the entire story it's clear what happened. And in actuality this quote doesn't matter either--people will believe what they want to believe Which is why I couldn't get past the first 12 posts in this thread before my clueless comment. For anyone to think a team's owners wouldn't or even shouldn't be involved in the hiring of its HC, the very face of their franchise, is absurd and really speaks to a lack of critical thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) Which is why I couldn't get past the first 12 posts in this thread before my clueless comment. For anyone to think a team's owners wouldn't or even shouldn't be involved in the hiring of its HC, the very face of their franchise, is absurd and really speaks to a lack of critical thinking. What do you define as involved? Overruling the first choice of their GM? Edited January 1, 2017 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 What do you define as involved? Overruling the first choice of their GM? It's defined as whatever THEY define it as. IMO, at the very least, it means they have final say, whether that means overruling their GM or not. They are the phucking owners for crissakes and people around here act like that's some sort of insignificant thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) It's defined as whatever THEY define it as. IMO, at the very least, it means they have final say, whether that means overruling their GM or not. They are the phucking owners for crissakes and people around here act like that's some sort of insignificant thing. I guess we get to define if they are GOOD owners or not, then. Edited January 1, 2017 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 I guess we get to define if they are GOOD owners or not, then. Like that was ever in question. Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 Like that was ever in question. Christ. Well, when you start to call into question if the fan base is allowed to say whether they "should" do something, you do insinuate that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 It's a football decision and they aren't football people. I hope their involvement is a simple rubber stamp. If they don't trust Whaley to do his job they should replace him. Of course they trust Whaley. They trusted him when he told them Rex was "the one". John Wawrow @john_wawrow 3m3 minutes ago Whaley will make recommendation. Up to Pegulas to approve. Lori Chase @LChase_RA 1m1 minute ago Gotta think ANY team owner would have to sign off on a multi-million dollar HC deal, yes? This is how they picked Rex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 Well, when you start to call into question if the fan base is allowed to say whether they "should" do something, you do insinuate that. Wrong because I don't presume the fans need "permission" for anything. If you need to make excuses for the fans' naïveté, be my guest. I thought we had smarter fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What a Tuel Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) It's all over the news how it's Lynn's job to lose. There won't be a search, just going through the motions. Whaley has a guy he knows will do whatever he wants. Anyone that wants to bet against that let me know. It's a done deal Kind of like how Marrone was a clear HC candidate for many teams last year? Take what the media says with a grain of salt. Edited January 1, 2017 by What a Tuel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted January 1, 2017 Share Posted January 1, 2017 (edited) Wrong because I don't presume the fans need "permission" for anything. If you need to make excuses for the fans' naïveté, be my guest. I thought we had smarter fans. As long as the Pegulas continue to be "involved" by overruling their GM, expect the fans to continue to complain about them being "involved." To expect anything else is to be naive. Edited January 1, 2017 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts