Benjamin Franklin Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Trump is bringing Obama's brother and a Benghazi mother. Clinton is carrying her most recent John Podesta baggage. 'merica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 At Previous Debates, Melania Trump and Bill Clinton Shook Hands. Not Anymore. ( Clinton request) http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/us/politics/melania-trump-bill-clinton.html?_r=0 12 Questions We’d Like to Hear at the Presidential Debate http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/20/us/politics/candidate-issues-debate-questions.html?rref=collection%2Fnewseventcollection%2FPresidential 10 big issues still on the table ahead of Wednesday's presidential debate NBCNews.com Clinton vs. Trump: Your guide to the final presidential debate www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Bringing his brother? Right out of The Godfather 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) Bringing his brother? Right out of The Godfather 2. Senator! This committee owes an apology!..................... Third presidential debate 2016: Five things to watch The Hill on MSN.com · I don't know why the media doesn't just save time and release their debate reviews now, They're already written Edited October 19, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpberr Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 This *might* be a surprisingly civil debate that will confuse everyone afterwards. This debate has an experienced moderator. Both candidates have every reason in the universe to talk about "boring" issues. She doesn't want to touch any of the Wikileaks stuff and he doesn't want to get wrapped into 90 minutes more of dealing with the groping accusations. They both want voters to turn out to vote for them. He's being coached to stay on message. She's being coached to run out the clock and make it a fast 90 minutes and get out of there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted October 19, 2016 Author Share Posted October 19, 2016 They both want voters to turn out to vote for them. He's being coached to stay on message. She's being coached to run out the clock and make it a fast 90 minutes and get out of there. There's no way he stays on message. You know that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 There's no way he stays on message. You know that, right? He might. I mean, considering his only message is "Election is rigged and Hillary's a YUUUUUUUGE liar!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 He might. I mean, considering his only message is "Election is rigged and Hillary's a YUUUUUUUGE liar!" Oh sure, make fun of somebody just for being right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Oh sure, make fun of somebody just for being right! You guys do it to me all the time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 You guys do it to me all the time... So I guess what you are saying is that you and Trump have a lot in common? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Is Chris Wallace Mike Wallace's son? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Is Chris Wallace Mike Wallace's son? Yep. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Yep. . Unlike Jeremy Schaap, he is actually good. I king of like Joe Buck but understand why people don't. His dad was the ultimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 (edited) "The Supreme Court needs to stand on the side of the American people." Hillary's answer on the 2nd A I'm pretty sure Clinton means that the Constitution means what she needs it to mean. So.....In HRC's first answer she said SCOTUS should violate their oaths and stand up to the powerful. That's not the job. According to Clinton, there should be no restrictions on the “right” to abortion, but many restrictions on the right to bear arms. In one case she’s trying to save the children but in the other she’s trying to kill the children. Edited October 20, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Yes, Chris. Nice question re open borders. I wonder what she would give for a Kleenex right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 She's talking about cyber attacks and hacks - he's missing a golden opportunity to bring up her unsecured emails. " Madame secretary, Putin couldn't hack emails sent from a private server". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 She's talking about cyber attacks and hacks - he's missing a golden opportunity to bring up her unsecured emails. " Madame secretary, Putin couldn't hack emails sent from a private server". Like.................. By the way, if Russian hackers are such a threat (and they are), I wouldn’t keep my classified information on a private server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Like.................. By the way, if Russian hackers are such a threat (and they are), I wouldn’t keep my classified information on a private server. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 She's talking about cyber attacks and hacks - he's missing a golden opportunity to bring up her unsecured emails. " Madame secretary, Putin couldn't hack emails sent from a private server". I'd rather watch a crap team thatbhasntbwon in 108 years. I turned it on for 5 seconds and she said the issue was who hacked the emails, not what was in them. It exposes the undeniable fact that she thinks she should be able to do what ever she wants and be able to hide it from the public. She is whining. If the Russians didn't hack it there are about 1000 other parties that could have. At no point did either of them say we need to secure govt communications. Documents have been stolen by spies, reporters, competitors and rivals of all sorts since the beginning of time. That won't stop. The way they were exposed does not change their content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts