Jump to content

Brady or Belichick


Guest K-GunJimKelly12

  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. Brady or Belichick

    • Tom Brady
      9
    • Bill Belichick
      65


Recommended Posts

 

He did it for a whole season in 2009. Yes Brady gets NE an extra couple wins each year but BB is the architect.

 

Regardless of who is playing QB, look at the way he constructs game plans, how he exploits what is given to him, how well prepared his players are for any situation. When was the last time a guy on the field for NE looked "lost"? It just never happens in NE.

Ya and they missed the playoffs. They went 11-5 which is very good but on a extremely soft schedule. Just look at it this way. Belichick has made the playoffs every single year with Brady since 2003 I believe (maybe even earlier). The one year Brady got Injured, he missed the playoffs. And on top of that Cassel was a very competent QB from 2008-2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am really surprised by the overwhelming votes saying belichick. He is an amazing coach, and maybe the best ever but a hall of fame QB is more valuable. The patriots have been playing great with back up QBS, but do you actually think they could sustain that when opposing coaches get more game film on garoloppo or brissett? It has been 1.5 games for Jimmy and one for Brisett, I can almost guarantee defences would figure those guys out especially Brisett after some more game tape. My answer will always be a great QB over a great coach, just my opinion.

Sorry, just think you're flat out wrong on this one. I've seen enough with Matt Cassel, Jimmy G and now a rookie on a short week winning 27-0 against a 2-0 team. Not to mention the amount of times the Pats have won when Brady wasn't on his game or the game plan was geared toward winning with a heavy dose of the run. Sure, Brady has thrown the team on his back before and won the game for them, but that's not to say they wouldn't have won with another QB with a totally different game plan to utilize that players strengths. It actually amazes me that more coaches don't take this approach and is reason #1 for the Bills struggles. Too many times coaches try to fit their players to the scheme instead of fitting the scheme to your players strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belichick is greatest HC of all time. Brady is the greatest QB of all time. These two statements are both mutually exclusive.

 

So, when you have the greatest HC of all time paired up with greatest QB of all time you have the greatest system of all time.

There needs to be a like button!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, just think you're flat out wrong on this one. I've seen enough with Matt Cassel, Jimmy G and now a rookie on a short week winning 27-0 against a 2-0 team. Not to mention the amount of times the Pats have won when Brady wasn't on his game or the game plan was geared toward winning with a heavy dose of the run. Sure, Brady has thrown the team on his back before and won the game for them, but that's not to say they wouldn't have won with another QB with a totally different game plan to utilize that players strengths. It actually amazes me that more coaches don't take this approach and is reason #1 for the Bills struggles. Too many times coaches try to fit their players to the scheme instead of fitting the scheme to your players strengths.

Belichick is an amazing coach. But just remember, the one year Brady was injured what happened? They missed the playoffs. That is no coincidence. A QB is always more valuable than a head coach. Matt cassel also had some very good years with the chiefs if you recall. Made the playoffs 2 years with them I believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this poll asking who I would rather punch in the face? I'll never understand coveting the enemy. I HATE them and want to beat them

 

same. But I'll take some of the enemies coordinators.

Belichick is an amazing coach. But just remember, the one year Brady was injured what happened? They missed the playoffs. That is no coincidence. A QB is always more valuable than a head coach. Matt cassel also had some very good years with the chiefs if you recall. Made the playoffs 2 years with them I believe

 

They missed the playoffs with Cassel, but did win 10 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C. Biscuit: Man, do not his coordinating stints with the Giants, Pats, and Jets count? Also, he went 11-5 in the Cassell season, and I think that may be the only time this century an 11-5 team didn't make the playoffs.

As a DC. Dick Jauron went 13-3 starting Cade McNown and Jim Miller. He won 7 games a year with JP Losman and Trent Edwards. I'm very impressed by their start but I tend to favor coaches who win playoffs games with multiple Qbs. It's why I think Joe Gibbs is secretly on the short list of best coach ever.

 

And I have hated almost everything about Rex's cos bing job here. But if we just switch coaches, how does each team do this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a DC. Dick Jauron went 13-3 starting Cade McNown and Jim Miller. He won 7 games a year with JP Losman and Trent Edwards. I'm very impressed by their start but I tend to favor coaches who win playoffs games with multiple Qbs. It's why I think Joe Gibbs is secretly on the short list of best coach ever.

 

And I have hated almost everything about Rex's cos bing job here. But if we just switch coaches, how does each team do this year?

I'm going to press you again on this: since the league went to a 16 game schedule in 1978, the 2008 Patriots are the ONLY 11-5 team to not make the playoffs. Do you not think they would have won a playoff game that year had they made it? They had won their final four games of the season by a collective score of 133-54. Denver went to the playoffs with an 8-8 record that year, btw.

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to press you again on this: since the league went to a 16 game schedule in 1978, the 2008 Patriots are the ONLY 11-5 team to not make the playoffs. Do you not think they would have won a playoff game that year had they made it? They had won their final four games of the season by a collective score of 133-54. Denver went to the playoffs with an 8-8 record that year, btw.

Stuff happens like that that. They still lost 5 games than they did the previous year. The Jets missed the playoffs at 10-6 last year and that rarely happens too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He won 11 games with Matt freaking Cassel. That's a pretty good feat in itself, no matter how hard you try to diminish it.

Cassel was good for like 3 or 4 years.. And they won 11 games because there schedule was a joke. They played the NFC west that year, and seattle won that division at like 7 and 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassel was good for like 3 or 4 years.. And they won 11 games because there schedule was a joke. They played the NFC west that year, and seattle won that division at like 7 and 9

Didn't they also win a playoff game Seatle that year? Was a huge upset if I remember right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff happens like that that. They still lost 5 games than they did the previous year. The Jets missed the playoffs at 10-6 last year and that rarely happens too.

There have been at least ten instances of 10-6 teams not making it.

 

same. But I'll take some of the enemies coordinators.

 

They missed the playoffs with Cassel, but did win 10 games.

11 games. To reiterate, the 2008 Patriots are the only 11-5 team to not make the playoffs in league history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...