B-Man Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Federal judge eases Pennsylvania's ballot requirement for third party candidates. http://www.post-gazette.com/early-returns/erstate/2016/07/01/Federal-judge-gives-third-parties-a-helping-hand-on-PA-ballot/stories/201607010174 I question the timing. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Federal judge eases Pennsylvania's ballot requirement for third party candidates. http://www.post-gazette.com/early-returns/erstate/2016/07/01/Federal-judge-gives-third-parties-a-helping-hand-on-PA-ballot/stories/201607010174 I question the timing. When the two major party candidates are as pathetic as Trump and Hillary, the timing is perfect, if not a bit late. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Federal judge eases Pennsylvania's ballot requirement for third party candidates. http://www.post-gazette.com/early-returns/erstate/2016/07/01/Federal-judge-gives-third-parties-a-helping-hand-on-PA-ballot/stories/201607010174 I question the timing. . When the two major party candidates are as pathetic as Trump and Hillary, the timing is perfect, if not a bit late. No. Trump is close in PA. Hillary cannot win without PA. So the more choices the better for Hillary.....................THAT is the motivation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Just NBC and the inevitable "concern over republican overreach " Analysis: Republicans Risk Playing into Clinton’s Hands With Comey Hearing. As Allahpundit noted in 2013, in a post titled “Actual NYT headline: ‘IRS Focus on Conservatives Gives GOP an Issue to Seize On,’ You know this routine by now: If it’s a scandal involving Republicans, the story is the scandal. If it’s a scandal involving Democrats, the story — or at least a significant part of it — is whether and how Republicans will ‘politicize’ the scandal for their advantage… JOURNALISM: Sign of the Times? Congresswoman to be indicted, no story in NYT. “ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 12, 2016 Author Share Posted July 12, 2016 More evidence of what everyone already knows, the system is rigged: Money laundering ain't a crime so long as you're a bank, even if you're a bank working for terrorists and drug cartels. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36768140 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 Everyone agrees............ Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has crossed way, way over the line http://wpo.st/8WOl1 The line? She can't even see the line. RBG just risked her judicial independence and her legacy to insult Donald Trump: http://slate.me/29zv56j Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 If a loony left publication like Slate is bashing Ginsburg.... ...and who admires a Justice enough to change their mind? Lawyers? What was the point, unless she plans to step down soon, or that she has completely given up the notion of an unbiased Supreme Court. Are the liberal Justices finally going to stop pretending they're reading the Constitution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 Everyone agrees............ Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has crossed way, way over the line http://wpo.st/8WOl1 The line? She can't even see the line. RBG just risked her judicial independence and her legacy to insult Donald Trump: http://slate.me/29zv56j Red, Blue, Green. She's white light, she's immaculate, she's pure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 14, 2016 Author Share Posted July 14, 2016 ERIC HOLDER HAS long insisted that he tried really hard when he was attorney general to make criminal cases against big banks in the wake of the 2007 financial crisis. His excuse, which he made again just last month, was that Justice Department prosecutors didn’t have enough evidence to bring charges. Many critics have long suspected that was bull ****, and that Holder, for a combination of political, self-serving, and craven reasons, held his department back. A new, thoroughly-documented report from the House Financial Services Committee supports that theory. It recounts how career prosecutors in 2012 wanted to criminally charge the global bank HSBC for facilitating money laundering for Mexican drug lords and terrorist groups. But Holder said no. When asked on June 8 why his Justice Department did not equally apply the criminal laws to financial institutions in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis, Holder told the platform drafting panel of the Democratic National Committee that it was laboring under a “misperception.” He told the panel: “The question you need to ask yourself is, if we could have made those cases, do you think we would not have? Do you think that these very aggressive U.S. attorneys I was proud to serve with would have not brought these cases if they had the ability?” The report — the result of a three-year investigation — shows that aggressive attorneys did want to prosecute HSBC, but Holder overruled them. https://theintercept.com/2016/07/12/eric-holders-longtime-excuse-for-not-prosecuting-banks-just-crashed-and-burned/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 17, 2016 Author Share Posted July 17, 2016 http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/16/justice-department-freedom-of-information-computer-system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/16/justice-department-freedom-of-information-computer-system bull ****. That article conveniently ignores the well-known fact (in government IT circles) that the FBI's replacement system was one of the single most !@#$ed-up federal IT acquisitions of the past 15 years (off the top of my head, only NYC's "CityTime" was more !@#$ed up, but that was because of a lack of oversight and contractor fraud so rampant it was honestly funny.) They're using an antiquated system instead of their new system because they don't have a new system - it still doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 #DNCleaks email illustrates DNC collusion with MSM BUT ALSO provides schematic for money laundering campaign funds https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13083 … 5 Biggest Scoops from the #DNCLeaks Warren Buffett has been giving big money behind the scenes to Clinton. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20525 … The MSM will stay silent over #DNCLeaks. If this was #GOPLeaks it would be covered for weeks. Honestly, with George Stephanopoulos and Chris Cuomo out in the open, why would I think the #DNCleak is controversial? #DNCLeaks: Clinton campaign arranged call with editor to try and squash Victory Funds money laundering story https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13083 … Broadcasters so far implicanted in #DNCLeaks: MSNBC, CBS Broadcasters so far not covering #DNCLeaks: MSNBC, CBS And...................................HERE WE GO. Google now listing Wikileaks as a 'dangerous' site http://bit.ly/2ajvUmC TWITTER HAS REMOVED #DNCLeaks & #DNCLeak from trends!!! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Yup... The media is officially, beyond any doubt, the progressive socialist agendas state controlled ministry of propaganda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 (edited) BUSTED: 19,252 Emails From DNC Leaked By Wikileaks by Caleb Howe On Friday, website Wikileaks posted over 19,000 emails that were taken from the Democratic National Committee that show story manipulation and collusion with the MSM, internal attempts to sabotage Bernie Sanders during the primary, and a whole lot more. This huge political story and scandal broke on Friday morning, though you may not have heard about it. It seems the collusion extended even to burying the story of the leak itself, as most news outlets gave it minimal coverage and little air time, and Twitter was accused of actively covering it up. Here are the story highlights (we'll have much more on this throughout the weekend.) Here's a breakdown from The Hill, one of the first sites to cover the leak: And here's a good starting summary from The Next Web: THE SUPPRESSION: Best summed up by the Washington Examiner: http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2016/07/23/collusion-corruption-cover-20000-emails-dnc-released-wikileaks/ Call it a hunch, but I don't think the DNC wanted Bernie Sanders to win the primary against Hillary. . Edited July 23, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 BUSTED: 19,252 Emails From DNC Leaked By Wikileaks by Caleb Howe On Friday, website Wikileaks posted over 19,000 emails that were taken from the Democratic National Committee that show story manipulation and collusion with the MSM, internal attempts to sabotage Bernie Sanders during the primary, and a whole lot more. This huge political story and scandal broke on Friday morning, though you may not have heard about it. It seems the collusion extended even to burying the story of the leak itself, as most news outlets gave it minimal coverage and little air time, and Twitter was accused of actively covering it up. Here are the story highlights (we'll have much more on this throughout the weekend.) Here's a breakdown from The Hill, one of the first sites to cover the leak: And here's a good starting summary from The Next Web: THE SUPPRESSION: Best summed up by the Washington Examiner: http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2016/07/23/collusion-corruption-cover-20000-emails-dnc-released-wikileaks/ Call it a hunch, but I don't think the DNC wanted Bernie Sanders to win the primary against Hillary. . Cut the MSM some slack. They've got more important stuff to cover. Like Melania Trump's plagiary of Michelle Obama's speech Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 HERE we have DNC directly contacting @MSNBC to cut off Clinton criticism MID SEGMENT #DNCLeaks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 Every day through the convention WikiLeaks will be releasing more emails. Just FYI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I'm excited the DNC and media are being exposed. Unfortunately not enough people willcare Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 I'm excited the DNC and media are being exposed. Unfortunately not enough people willcare Normally I would agree, but I don't think the Bernie followers are a fluke. They may be misguided in my eyes, but he really pit them against Hillary based on the fact that the DNC system is rigged. They genuinely see HIllary as the corrupt Wall Street and foreign money-laundering hawk that she is. Watching everything released to confirm it, especially during the convention...I have to wonder how Bernie handles his speech. Talk about a shift: I didn't watch a moment of the RNC, and somehow can't wait to watch the DNC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Could be a hot time in the old town this week in Philly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts