Jump to content

Photo proof CJ Anderson never crossed the goal line


Recommended Posts

CJA_TD.jpg

 

More evidence that the officials were either absurdly incompetent or deliberately screwing the Bills. This photo shows CJ Anderson was sitting on the field with the ball inches short of the goal line. It should have been 4th and inches, not a TD. Fist bump, indeed. They said the reviewed it but they didn't look real hard.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know.... the officials yesterday were either cheating or are horribly incompetent. They should be suspended either way. We have actually started demoting referees for a week at a time to the minor leagues in soccer over here if they have pathetic displays like the one that crew had yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJA_TD.jpg

 

More evidence that the officials were either absurdly incompetent or deliberately screwing the Bills. This photo shows CJ Anderson was sitting on the field with the ball inches short of the goal line. It should have been 4th and inches, not a TD. Fist bump, indeed. They said the reviewed it but they didn't look real hard.

 

Where is the ball? Your arrow is on some orange and white thing, or Welker's knee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That photo is not definitive. You cannot see the knee.

 

He wasn't in. It wasn't a TD. It was a hair short. But you cannot use two different replays to prove it. That's not allowed. So even though you could prove he wasn't by two different replays, the officials are not allowed to overturn it. You can't blame them for that, and you can't really blame them for missing the call by an inch in real time when it looked like he snuck through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absurdly incompetent from that photo? You do realize they have to make the call real time and I'm not even sure that photo is definitive

So are saying he definitely looked to be in? You can see both his feet. One is perfectly horizontal on the ground. Look at the position he is in. His butt has to be on the ground there, unless he's made of rubber.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So are saying he definitely looked to be in? You can see both his feet. One is perfectly horizontal on the ground. Look at the position he is in. His butt has to be on the ground there, unless he's made of rubber.

 

The burden of proof there is that he must be proven out and again it's called full speed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is sitting on the ground, elbow down, legs horizontal, with no sign of the ball crossing the goal line.

 

At worst for the ref he was fractions of in inch away if you slow it down to still frames which isn't how it works. I also don't know that the angle is great, the line is great or where the tip of the ball is... And Id have to judge full speed

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many Bills TDs have been called back with less proof?

 

You can see the goal line but you can't see the ball.

 

How bout Sammys TD in the first Miami game? How bout the same thing on Leos TD in the Jets game. Both could reasonably have been called fumbles through the endzone...

 

but both counted as TDs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...