Nanker Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 eBOla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frit0 Bandit0 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Ebolá Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) Another aspect to think about is Ebola can survive for several days outside the host in body fluids making them very dangerous in the hands of the wrong people. All you need to produce weapons is someone with Ebola, or steal body fluids from area's outbreaks are occuring. So for security reasons the military needs to get more involved IMO. Edited October 28, 2014 by Donald Duck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 All you need to produce weapons is someone with Ebola, or steal body fluids from area's outbreaks are occuring. It's a little more complicated than that. Just a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) Another aspect to think about is Ebola can survive for several days outside the host in body fluids making them very dangerous in the hands of the wrong people. All you need to produce weapons is someone with Ebola, or steal body fluids from area's outbreaks are occuring. So for security reasons the military needs to get more involved IMO. Hi dumby More men have married Kim Kardashian then Americans have died from Ebola. More Americans have died from a shark attack (2) in the last year then have been killed by Ebola More people are killed in this country by lightning (average of 33) then killed by Ebola Oh wait, here is this http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2014/10/23/358349882/an-answer-for-americans-who-ask-whats-my-risk-of-catching-ebola Edited October 28, 2014 by jboyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) It's a little more complicated than that. Just a bit. More complicated then taking blood out of a live or dead host, pumping it into a waterballoon and dispersing the balloons in crowded places from rooftops? Or any number of other ways you could spray this into a mist and have tiny droplets going into the eyes of numerous unsuspecting targets? How less complicated can it get? Hi dumby More men have married Kim Kardashian then Americans have died from Ebola. More Americans have died from a shark attack (2) in the last year then have been killed by Ebola More people are killed in this country by lightning (average of 33) then killed by Ebola Oh wait, here is this http://www.npr.org/b...-catching-ebola Am I even talking about a US citizens chance of catching Ebola and dying? In my best DC Tom imitation, hey dumboyst, your an idiot Note: To avoid getting another warning point I'm just going to stop responding to your insulting way of communication Edited October 28, 2014 by Donald Duck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) More complicated then taking blood out of a live or dead host, pumping it into a waterballoon and dispersing the balloons in crowded places from rooftops? Or any number of other ways you could spray this into a mist and have tiny droplets going into the eyes of numerous unsuspecting targets? How less complicated can it get? Am I even talking about a US citizens chance of catching Ebola and dying? In my best DC Tom imitation, hey dumboyst, your an idiot if I was tom I'd not be sure to laugh that you cannot even hold a candle to him or laugh that you're copying him And I don't know why you care about some other country or the "epidemic" over there. Let them die, I could care less. Its their problem. Not ours. The only issue I have is the incompetence in office that could let them enter this country since the WH/Obama Admin and TSA are awful. Edit. I just read the first part responding to tom. Wow. I did not realize how truly stupid you are. Edited October 28, 2014 by jboyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 More complicated then taking blood out of a live or dead host, pumping it into a waterballoon and dispersing the contents in crowded places from rooftops? Or any number of other ways you could spray this into a mist and have tiny droplets going into the eyes of numerous unsuspecting targets? Far more complicated. Most people think it's just that easy...but bioweapons delivery is surprisingly difficult. The only group that with any certainty has successfully done it is the Rajneesh cultists in Oregon in the '80s, and only because their methods were brutally simple and not even as remotely stupid as water balloons full of blood - and they still had one of the best microbiology labs in the state backing them. Water balloons. Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) Far more complicated. Most people think it's just that easy...but bioweapons delivery is surprisingly difficult. The only group that with any certainty has successfully done it is the Rajneesh cultists in Oregon in the '80s, and only because their methods were brutally simple and not even as remotely stupid as water balloons full of blood - and they still had one of the best microbiology labs in the state backing them. Water balloons. Jesus. hey man, I have to keep my examples simplistic for simpletons far more complicated how? Edited October 28, 2014 by Donald Duck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 hey man, I have to keep my examples simplistic for simpletons like farm boys far more complicated how? OK quack sucker. How would a more complicated attack work? I'm fairly certain I'm more intelligent then you. I own a house. You borrow a basement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) Great, now I have to add water balloons to the list of things I'm scared of. ISIS wearing externally padded football helmets armed with water balloons, we are all doomed. Edited October 28, 2014 by shrader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Water balloons. Jesus. While this isn't his point, the amount of terror you would create by dropping a bunch of balloons filled with blood on people in, say, an indoor sports arena would be pretty epic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 While this isn't his point, the amount of terror you would create by dropping a bunch of balloons filled with blood on people in, say, an indoor sports arena would be pretty epic. No doubt. Hell, the amount of terror you would create by dropping a bunch of balloons filled with water would be considerable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Another aspect to think about is Ebola can survive for several days outside the host in body fluids making them very dangerous in the hands of the wrong people. All you need to produce weapons is someone with Ebola, or steal body fluids from area's outbreaks are occuring. So for security reasons the military needs to get more involved IMO. :wallbash: At least when Tom Clancy weaponized Ebola he knew what he was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 :wallbash: At least when Tom Clancy weaponized Ebola he knew what he was talking about. Water balloons. !@#$ing water !@#$ing balloons. And he's worked in nookyooler power plants. I wonder how the nuclear power industry handles the water balloon threat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigfatbillsfan Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 1) Because international air travel doesn't work that way. Duncan flew to the US via Brussels...should we institute an air travel ban for Belgium, too? How about England, since lots of flights connect through Heathrow? Or the Netherlands? How many countries do we have to institute a travel ban for, for it to work? 2) The threat is becoming very over-sensationalized. Ebola does not spread easily. I'll let you look up why and how that is, since you won't believe me...but I will point out that even double the confirmed 8000 cases and 4000 deaths in six months is NOT a highly transmissible disease. Travel bans are serious overkill for a minimal threat. 3) If you're going to blame Obama for this, take it to PPP so I can abuse you properly. One of the few times I have to agree with Tom. Dammit Tom!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donald Duck Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 Water balloons. !@#$ing water !@#$ing balloons. And he's worked in nookyooler power plants. I wonder how the nuclear power industry handles the water balloon threat... Decontaminate the threat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 (edited) Decontaminate the threat bomb africa? Edited October 28, 2014 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 bomb africa? Nuke the gay whales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 http://crooksandliars.com/2014/10/last-week-tonights-john-oliver-some-advice, john oliver, on comedic point once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts