YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) I don't like it much. http://forgedinbuffa...lls-mock-draft/ Edited May 5, 2014 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 There is no way NIklas lasts until round 3. Scenerio 1 is ok but I would prefer a DE in round 3 instead of a LB CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Author Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) Obsessed much with Seastrunk? He is in every scenario I think. He is a younger Spiller... maybe he knows the writing is on the wall with the contract since his contact is Littman's kid. Scenario 3 blows. I trust that these are BPA on their boards but don't see a sense of urgency with another sub-6'0 WR. Edited May 5, 2014 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don't stop billievein Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) If we draft Odell Beckham with any of our picks I'm gonna lose my sh*t!!! He may be good but we don't need another small explosive receiver. Edited May 5, 2014 by Don't stop billievein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Author Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) If we draft Odell Beckham with any of our picks I'm gonna lose my sh*t!!! He maybe good but we don't need another small explosive receiver. This. Beckham is a stud but think about this way - we basically drafted a 6'1 WR with our 6th rd pick when we traded for MW and we drafted two 6'0 and under WRs last year. We already had Stevie. There's 4. If they want to upgrade the WR position and I think they should, it is Evans or a waste. Or they have plans to move on from Stevie or they already caught MW in handcuffs. Woods is Beckham. Edited May 5, 2014 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tintonfallsbillsfan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 They all make sense . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Right off the top I am skeptical: I have been told it is nearly impossible for the team to sign off on a pick that hasn’t interviewed with the team (brought in for a visit). Last year the Bills drafted 2 players they brought in for a visit: Manuel and Meeks, the other 6 did not visit. IMO, his most realistic is scenario 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Author Share Posted May 5, 2014 Right off the top I am skeptical: I have been told it is nearly impossible for the team to sign off on a pick that hasn’t interviewed with the team (brought in for a visit). Last year the Bills drafted 2 players they brought in for a visit: Manuel and Meeks, the other 6 did not visit. IMO, his most realistic is scenario 2. I thought the exact same thing. Wondered if Nix/Whaley have different rules or if he is off on this. Right off the top I am skeptical: I have been told it is nearly impossible for the team to sign off on a pick that hasn’t interviewed with the team (brought in for a visit). Last year the Bills drafted 2 players they brought in for a visit: Manuel and Meeks, the other 6 did not visit. IMO, his most realistic is scenario 2. IMO, that is also the one that would most improve this team immediately. Wish for a different RB but if Spiller is a goner then OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tintonfallsbillsfan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I have been thinking a lot about beckman, and the thought that we don't need another small explosive reciever. First Beckman is not really small, a tick under 6 feet. Second,Woods williams and stevie are the current top 3 and none would be considered small and explosive. Goodwin is small and fast , an I am a big fan but I don't think he is ever going to be a number one. Beckham is a potential number 1. He catches everything and runs well after the catch. He would add and element that the club currently doesn't have . While Beckham would not be my dream scenerio I have to say picking him over Martin works for me. Matin is a fine o lineman but does he offer that much value in comparison to the second round options that should be avialable ? I don't think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 As the song says...nobody knows...but, I like either option 2 or 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Author Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) I have been thinking a lot about beckman, and the thought that we don't need another small explosive reciever. First Beckman is not really small, a tick under 6 feet. Second,Woods williams and stevie are the current top 3 and none would be considered small and explosive. Goodwin is small and fast , an I am a big fan but I don't think he is ever going to be a number one. Beckham is a potential number 1. He catches everything and runs well after the catch. He would add and element that the club currently doesn't have . While Beckham would not be my dream scenerio I have to say picking him over Martin works for me. Matin is a fine o lineman but does he offer that much value in comparison to the second round options that should be avialable ? I don't think so I agree.... just had my heart set on a bigger target. Perhaps they see Ramses Barden filling this void if they go this route. Edited May 5, 2014 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I have been thinking a lot about beckman, and the thought that we don't need another small explosive reciever. First Beckman is not really small, a tick under 6 feet. Second,Woods williams and stevie are the current top 3 and none would be considered small and explosive. Goodwin is small and fast , an I am a big fan but I don't think he is ever going to be a number one. Beckham is a potential number 1. He catches everything and runs well after the catch. He would add and element that the club currently doesn't have . While Beckham would not be my dream scenerio I have to say picking him over Martin works for me. Matin is a fine o lineman but does he offer that much value in comparison to the second round options that should be avialable ? I don't think so Beckham is very, very similar to Robert Woods...I would not be thrilled with taking another guy like that in the 1st round this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Seastrunk wont make it to round 4, he's the best RB after Hyde/Mason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Am I only the one who pictures this whenever they hear "sources:" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Author Share Posted May 5, 2014 (edited) Am I only the one who pictures this whenever they hear "sources:" #sourcesdeepwithin. Oh, and he needs to be in his parents' basement. Edited May 5, 2014 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Right off the top I am skeptical: I have been told it is nearly impossible for the team to sign off on a pick that hasn’t interviewed with the team (brought in for a visit). Last year the Bills drafted 2 players they brought in for a visit: Manuel and Meeks, the other 6 did not visit. i think he neglects the idea of visiting guys at pro days, meetings at the combine, etc.... id imagine if they have never met the kid at all they may hesitate a little more, but i think they have probably had face time with a HUGE number of guys outside of official visits to OBD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodbuster Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Right off the top I am skeptical: I have been told it is nearly impossible for the team to sign off on a pick that hasn’t interviewed with the team (brought in for a visit). Last year the Bills drafted 2 players they brought in for a visit: Manuel and Meeks, the other 6 did not visit. IMO, his most realistic is scenario 2. I get the feeling he is talking about the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Am I only the one who pictures this whenever they hear "sources:" nah, that's pretty much it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don't stop billievein Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I have been thinking a lot about beckman, and the thought that we don't need another small explosive reciever. First Beckman is not really small, a tick under 6 feet. Second,Woods williams and stevie are the current top 3 and none would be considered small and explosive. Goodwin is small and fast , an I am a big fan but I don't think he is ever going to be a number one. Beckham is a potential number 1. He catches everything and runs well after the catch. He would add and element that the club currently doesn't have . While Beckham would not be my dream scenerio I have to say picking him over Martin works for me. Matin is a fine o lineman but does he offer that much value in comparison to the second round options that should be avialable ? I don't think so All I know about Beckham is he is more similar to the types of wr we already have on this team and would not give the bills something they don't already have. Mike Evans bring size and speed, we don't have a wr that is anything like Evans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 nah, that's pretty much it in this case i picture more chinstrap beard and drinking while driving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts