BillsFan-4-Ever Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul Ryan is out there twisting stories into lies again. A boy on a lunch program wanted to bring a bag lunch to school. HE wanted to have parents who cared about him. SAY what? The boy who wanted the lunch wanted it in a brown paper bag so he wouldn't get picked on. He (the kid) also wrote the book to which Mr Ryan lied about. http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-paul-ryan-brown-bag-lunch-story-20140307,0,2957092.story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul Ryan is out there twisting stories into lies again. A boy on a lunch program wanted to bring a bag lunch to school. HE wanted to have parents who cared about him. SAY what? The boy who wanted the lunch wanted it in a brown paper bag so he wouldn't get picked on. He (the kid) also wrote the book to which Mr Ryan lied about. http://www.latimes.c...0,2957092.story Explain how this is a lie. Oh and if it is policicians lying is ok. gator told me so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Explain how this is a lie. Oh and if it is policicians lying is ok. gator told me so. Now Chef, you are well aware that Republican politicians are held to a different standard. Rep. Ryan reaccounted a story that was told him by Eloise Anderson in testimony before his committee last summer. To his great discredit, he assumed that it was true (apparently without checking first) and used the story in his CPAC speech. Now it appears that she had either made up or "borrowed" the story. To some of the dunces on the Left............this IS the same as lying. To folks with any amount of intelligence, it was poor judgement on Mr Ryan's part. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I don't have a position on that issue. Never heard of it. It's an issue that is, quite frankly, central to immigration reform. Being an advocate of immigration reform, you should probably familiarize yourself with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul Ryan is out there twisting stories into lies again. A boy on a lunch program wanted to bring a bag lunch to school. HE wanted to have parents who cared about him. SAY what? The boy who wanted the lunch wanted it in a brown paper bag so he wouldn't get picked on. He (the kid) also wrote the book to which Mr Ryan lied about. http://www.latimes.c...0,2957092.story Every time I'm fully convinced gatorman is the single-most blindly idiotic tool to ever post something on a message board, you show up and change everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Paul Ryan is out there twisting stories into lies again. A boy on a lunch program wanted to bring a bag lunch to school. HE wanted to have parents who cared about him. SAY what? The boy who wanted the lunch wanted it in a brown paper bag so he wouldn't get picked on. He (the kid) also wrote the book to which Mr Ryan lied about. http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-paul-ryan-brown-bag-lunch-story-20140307,0,2957092.story Oh that darn Liberal media doing fact checking again! Just evil! It's an issue that is, quite frankly, central to immigration reform. Being an advocate of immigration reform, you should probably familiarize yourself with it. How is it central? I think you are engaging in hyperbole, but I'll allow you to change my mind if you want Explain how this is a lie. Oh and if it is policicians lying is ok. gator told me so. And it's ok to bust the little lying politicians also. This punk ain't never going to be President and won't get to take away kids free lunch, boo hoo Ryan=POS Now Chef, you are well aware that Republican politicians are held to a different standard. Rep. Ryan reaccounted a story that was told him by Eloise Anderson in testimony before his committee last summer. To his great discredit, he assumed that it was true (apparently without checking first) and used the story in his CPAC speech. Now it appears that she had either made up or "borrowed" the story. To some of the dunces on the Left............this IS the same as lying. To folks with any amount of intelligence, it was poor judgement on Mr Ryan's part. . he didn't check the story? What an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 (edited) How is it central? I think you are engaging in hyperbole, but I'll allow you to change my mind if you want Do a bit of research on "Reconquista" and "Azaltan" as related to the Chicano "La Raza" Movement. Please keep in mind that the term "La Raza" litterally translates to "The Race", or people of the lineage. It's a purely racial seperatist movement which has become central to Latin American Human Rights advocacy. Individuals subscribing to this belief system are not interested in becoming American; rather, they seek to undo the forming of the American South West, and reject the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidaldo. Edited March 11, 2014 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Do a bit of research on "Reconquista" and "Azaltan" as related to the Chicano "La Raza" Movement. Please keep in mind that the term "La Raza" litterally translates to "The Race", or people of the lineage. It's a purely racial seperatist movement which has become central to Latin American Human Rights advocacy. Individuals subscribing to this belief system are not interested in becoming American; rather, they seek to undo the forming of the American South West, and reject the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidaldo. Ya, that's going to happen. (rolls eyes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Ya, that's going to happen. (rolls eyes) That's not the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 That's not the point. Oh no? Then what is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Oh no? Then what is? Tell you what. Move to Southern California, live there as long as I did and do your own research. I'm not her to do you work for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Tell you what. Move to Southern California, live there as long as I did and do your own research. I'm not her to do you work for you. What, too many Latinos for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 What, too many Latinos for you? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 The dems will (most likely) proclaim another "nail in the T.E.A. Party coffin, and "proof that you can run on Obamacare" with their spin later tonight after the Jolly-Sink special election results. Ms. Sink, the dem candidate is favored Never mind that....................................... *Alex Sink is the bigger name, as a gubernatorial candidate in 2010 who won 47.7 percent of the vote in a year when Republicans did fantastically well across Florida. She’s been elected statewide, as chief financial officer of Florida in 2006 with 53.5 percent of the vote. *Her Republican opponent, David Jolly, has never run for office before. He was counsel to the previous congressman from this district, the late Bill Young, and spent several years as a lobbyist. *Sink’s campaign is raising and spending way more money than Jolly’s campaign. *Obama won this district, 50 percent to 49 percent, in 2012. *SmartPolitics notes that women candidates are twice as likely to win in a special election compared to a regular November election. *There’s a Libertarian candidate, Lucas Overby, polling at 4 to 7 percent, and one poll had him at 12 percent. Nope. I'm sure media stories proclaiming this "huge victory" are already written and if by some chance Mr. Jolly wins, well.............we can always blame something else besides the administration's policies......lol Well, I am pleasantly surprised to have been wrong Republican Jolly wins Fla. congressional race http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/us_politics/2014/03/republican_jolly_wins_fla_congressional_race I guess that I over-rated the DNC declaration "we can't afford to lose this special election" & trotting in Dollar Bill Clinton to support Ms. Sink. Mr. Jolly is a conservative and ran as such..............in a fairly close district. I cannot wait for November. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Yes. Well, too bad for you. And you wonder why they don't support your party Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Well, too bad for you. And you wonder why they don't support your party Why is that too bad for me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/enough-whining-teabaggers-actually-i The teabaggers were the ones who unleashed this on their own stupid selves. Or I should say, the ill-informed, ignorant nitwits who hijacked the movement. We need a third party, but it has to be VIABLE. Unfortunately every cranky lout who on one hand "hates" the gubmint (and on the other complains when the gubmint doesn't do enough for him) is drawn to the image of "patriot" but....they're not. They're just lunatic fringe wackos. The real reformers have lost their voices to these nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 http://crooksandliar...gers-actually-i The teabaggers were the ones who unleashed this on their own stupid selves. Or I should say, the ill-informed, ignorant nitwits who hijacked the movement. We need a third party, but it has to be VIABLE. Unfortunately every cranky lout who on one hand "hates" the gubmint (and on the other complains when the gubmint doesn't do enough for him) is drawn to the image of "patriot" but....they're not. They're just lunatic fringe wackos. The real reformers have lost their voices to these nuts. Still with the Palin thing huh? Will you please explain to me you're and others obsession? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Why is that too bad for me? Why don't you like them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 12, 2014 Share Posted March 12, 2014 Why don't you like them? Who said I didn't like them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts