Jump to content

Do Away with Divisions


The Big Cat

Recommended Posts

Nice post.

 

How bout: No divisions. No conferences. Lottery schedule. Some teams play 5 games. Some teams play 20.

 

It's a stretch, but I'll bet we'd learn to love it.

 

I like it. Get Goodell on the phone and I'll pitch it to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to go with the 2 conferences /one division...then go to a 19 game schedule...then you play 15 intraconference and 4 interconference games

 

Hmm, too many games, too many injuries if they're all in a row. Let's just have every team play every other week, from March through December. Then go to the playoffs, take February off for the draft and free agency, and start it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think just the prospect of annual Buffalo-Cleveland and Buffalo-Jacksonville games would be enough to kill this idea dead in the eyes of the league.

 

Just think: we'd also have a Rams Bucs game too!

 

We'd also have annual matchups between Brees and Rodgers, Brady and Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't like it

 

I like divisions and having rivalries but not a fan of only playing teams in your conference

 

The mistake that was made was expanding the league to 32 teams and creating 4 divisions of 4 teams instead of 3 divisions of 5 teams in each conference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if you had 1 Conference and 4 Divisions. North, South, East and West. Each Division had 8 teams. Regular season would consist of not playing your division, but 2 others. North vs South and East, South vs. North and West, East vs. North and West, West vs. East and South. That's 16 games to determine your position in your division against division foes facing the same teams but not each other. Everyone would have the same bye week, say in the middle of the season. The playoffs would be in a bracket style playoff system. Everyone makes the playoffs. You play within your division. 1's vs. 8's, 2,s vs. 7's and so on. Final 4 (Division champs) would be North vs. South, East vs. West to determine the Super Bowl. The next year, you just mix-up the regular (North vs. East and West.... ect) and playoffs (North vs. West, South vs. East). This way, you play a team 2 years in a row, 1 year off, except in your own division where you may face them every year, or not for years. The Super Bowl will most likely be two teams that have already played that year (sucks) but we have that possibilty now anyway. This schedule would give the NFL 20 more games a year (I think) and a chance for fans to fill out brackets while hoping their team (The Bills) could pull-off the upset of the year!

 

Don't kill me on this....... just thinking out-loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the current format except the some of the teams don't make sense in their respective divisions such as the Cowboys in the NFC East, or even the dolphins in the AFC East (I know they're on the East coast, but they don't fit in a division with 3 other northeast teams).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

am sick of the alignments in MLB and NFL. Was sick of the NHL and glad to see a change, but I liked the owners' proposal that was shot down last year better. The NFL never likes to move around too much, but it gets stale IMO.

I do think that the recent concussion settlement may result in more support among the owners for expansion (which is great IMO and may save the Bills in Buffalo).

 

For hypothetical, let's say they expanded to 2 cities, that is 34 teams

 

AFC

East

Jets

Giants

New England

Baltimore

Washington

Philadelphia

Carolina

London

 

Central

Bills

Steelers

Browns

Bengals

Colts

Lions

Packers

Bears

Vikings

 

NFC

South

Atlanta

Tampa Bay

Tennessee

New Orleans

Miami

Jacksonville

Houston

Dallas

St Louis

 

West

49ers

Oakland

Los Angeles

Seattle

San Diego

Denver

Arizona

Kansas City

 

 

Done, and awesomeness. You would hear crying from Dallas... but rivalries these days are mainly built situationally.

 

Treat each Division kind of like a Conference in NCAA. Play each team 1x and rotate the Home and Away every season.

Edited by May Day 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills would never again play a game vs the NFC.

One could always dream (not much different from today)

 

I think just the prospect of annual Buffalo-Cleveland and Buffalo-Jacksonville games would be enough to kill this idea dead in the eyes of the league.

Well for the last several years, that's not been much worse than a 2x annual matchup between Buffalo and Miami.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the Seahawks got in with a losing record, yeah, divisions should go. Probably no chance of that happening, though.

 

I had exactly the same idea, except keeping it at 16 and playing your arch rival home and away, which keeps a little bit of the rivalry thing going. I even thought you could alternate playing the rest of your conference one season and all of the other the following one. But that wouldn't be good for rivalries. Playing every opponent is one of the things I like about soccer leagues and is very democratic. Not sure there would be a big appetite for it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Niners are not the best of the top 6 in the NFC.

 

Could you put KC over Denver?

 

KC is playing well but I think Denver would smack the **** out of them to be honest.

 

In fact I think only Seattle could match up well with Denver at this point.

 

Once they get Von back... I would not want to play them. They're better than the 07 Pats..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...