B-Large Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Water Didn't think of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Didn't think of that. Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). I think the plan is to wait until everyone in Canada dies from waiting to see a doctor, and then take their water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I think the plan is to wait until everyone in Canada dies from waiting to see a doctor, and then take their water. Well, !@#$. Why are we paying for their oil then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Well, !@#$. Why are we paying for their oil then? Oil? Hell, I can't believe we pay money for their beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). "Either you bring the water to L.A. or you bring L.A. to the water." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 "Either you bring the water to L.A. or you bring L.A. to the water." In LA he's loved or hated but you can't beat his "driveway". I assume that's Mulholland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). People are always talking "Water Rights" here in Colorado.. we have water restrictions every year, it is really pretty dumb. So they restrict your watering to certain days, so people will water their grass even if the weather forcast says rains the next day because you can't water again for 4 more days... idiots.... Serves us rigth for planting warter hungry grass in a aired prarie I guess... Think of that, Buffalo being a boom town again, or least a desirable place.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). If Buffalo and Detroit actually had any resource that the rest of the country absolutely needed to survive, the politicians in both cities would !@#$ up the opportunity so badly, people would rather die than try to obtain said resource. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yeah, that'll be huge. Within the next 100 years, Detroit and Buffalo will be boom-towns again, as populations migrate closer to available fresh water (unless those idiots in the desert southwest actually do manage to get a water pipeline from the Great Lakes approved). But I thought cities like Detroit and Buffalo weren't Geographically Blessed® Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 But I thought cities like Detroit and Buffalo weren't Geographically Blessed® I thought Buffalo was over near the Vermont Border.......................what are you trying to pull Tom ? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 But I thought cities like Detroit and Buffalo weren't Geographically Blessed® No, they're just not civilized because they have ugly skylines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I thought Buffalo was over near the Vermont Border.......................what are you trying to pull Tom ? . Bottled Hudson River water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Bottled Hudson River water. You mean the Cuyahoga River I think you need a Geometry lesson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 Yes, sometimes economic cycles and human achievement can partially overcome government idiocy. Forward! Yes, government idiocy like threats of shut downs, defaults on the nation's credit--Alexander Hamilton is rolling in his grave--and slashing government spending left and right! Amazing the economy is doing so well! Leadership! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Yes, government idiocy like threats of shut downs, defaults on the nation's credit--Alexander Hamilton is rolling in his grave--and slashing government spending left and right! Amazing the economy is doing so well! Leadership! Its not. Also, slowing the rate of expenditure growth hardly counts as slashing spending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 Its not. Also, slowing the rate of expenditure growth hardly counts as slashing spending. At the state and local level? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 At the state and local level? Let me ask you a question. Do you think there are excess amounts of wasted spending in all levels of government? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 Let me ask you a question. Do you think there are excess amounts of wasted spending in all levels of government? Why don't you tell me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Why don't you tell me? You've been told this before and the process of a debate is when you're asked a question it is your turn to answer that question. So answer the question. I want you honest opinion whether or not you think there is massive waste in all levels of government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts