CarolinaBill Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Neither, actually, they both suck in different ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homey D. Clown Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Bruce Mathison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark80 Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) Romo. Â Its like upgrading from a toyota to an acura. An obvious improvement. Both are decently reliable and decently inexpensive to maintain, but the acura is clearly better than the Toyota, seven days a week. But neither says you have arrived. Â Until we get a benz, or a bentley, or a jaguar, we are just wasting time. Â Careful, there are plenty of Benz's and Jaguars out there that have less quality than some Acura's (and even some Toyotas). Don't just get caught up in the name (i.e. Vick, ROMO, etc.). However, get a Bentley and you're set. Get a Bugatti, Koenigsegg, McLaren and you're winning Superbowls. Edited October 18, 2012 by Mark80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsBiker Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 what a question.. both qb's are sh*t  Do you want Elephant sh*t, or Hyena sh*t?  either way you get sh*t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBill Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Romo. Kinda like asking who do you want at running back-Adrian Peterson or Johnny White? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Some of you guys must not watch other teams then the bills. Romo is awesome. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattsox Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Romo. He chokes sometimes but guy is a pro bowl caliber QB Â Yeah, have to agree. Romo thus far, Until Fitz can get his barings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Some of you guys must not watch other teams then the bills. Romo is awesome. Romo is awesome until it counts. Like playoffs or game 16 vs. the G-Men. That said I'd hook the wagon to him instead of Fitz anyday. Good chance he's available next year too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) Ro to the Mo! Â Romo is awesome until it counts. Like playoffs or game 16 vs. the G-Men. That said I'd hook the wagon to him instead of Fitz anyday. Good chance he's available next year too. Â Â As opposed to erractically awesome...so nothing counts? Edited October 18, 2012 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggieScooby Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I'd take Fitzpatrick. Romo has never won anything, and while Fitz hasn't either at least he's 2.5 years younger. If we upgrade the QB position I'd like it to be a rookie who can be the franchise guy for a decade or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterpan Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) I'll make this a more realistic discussion. Â Fitz, Cassel, or Gabbert? Pick your poisen boys! Â And listening to you guys talk down on Romo because he 'chokes', I'd love to hear how you talked about Kelly during the SB years. Edited October 18, 2012 by peterpan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) I would love to have Romo. I think 5 other teams would love to have Romo too. Â And if I had to pick my poison, probably Gabbert, just based on his age. Â I'd take Fitzpatrick. Romo has never won anything, and while Fitz hasn't either at least he's 2.5 years younger. If we upgrade the QB position I'd like it to be a rookie who can be the franchise guy for a decade or more. Â No doubt people would want a rookie over Romo, but I don't think that was what the OP was asking. Just imagine a QB who could even potentially throw over 20 years. The things we take for granted.... Besides, age matters less with QBs. Even Jeff George is still playing. Edited October 18, 2012 by kas23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBill Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Romo is awesome until it counts. Like playoffs or game 16 vs. the G-Men. That said I'd hook the wagon to him instead of Fitz anyday. Good chance he's available next year too. Fitz is never awesome, so it is still Romo by a country mile. Plus the Bills never get to "when it counts" so he would be perfect here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5 Wide Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I'd take Romo over Fitz 8 days a week. In a smaller, less scrutinized market playing for an owner that's not Jerrah, I think Romo would bounce back and utilize the talent he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lv-Bills Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Is this even a serious question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bufcomments Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I say both... Romo starts  Fitz his backup...there u go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 This is a joke right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
808 Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 romo is way ahead of fitz. no question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBill Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I'd take Fitzpatrick. Romo has never won anything, and while Fitz hasn't either at least he's 2.5 years younger. If we upgrade the QB position I'd like it to be a rookie who can be the franchise guy for a decade or more. So by your theory, Fitz is 4 years younger then Brees, 6 years younger then Brady and 7 years younger then Peyton Manning so you would take him over all those All Pros also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 With this O line, receiver corps, play calling, scheme....I wonder if Romo could pick up Gaileys offense. So far nobody but Fitz has been able to do that Yeah.... Fitz really has the offense humming along in high gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts