3rdnlng Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Yeah but those venture capitalists are different I can't wait for Romney to start comparing his success as a venture capitalist to Obama's success as a venture capitalist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I can't wait for Romney to start comparing his success as a venture capitalist to Obama's success as a venture capitalist. Yeah but as a venture capitalist Romney played God with other peoples money while Obama, uh nevermind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Yeah but as a venture capitalist Romney played God with other peoples money while Obama, uh nevermind Obama played God with the government's money. That's different, because all the money is the government's. [/DIN] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Now if that's not Crony Capitalism, then there is no such thing as Crony Capitalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 http://freebeacon.com/democratic-national-cronyism/ Just a little more fuel for the fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Anybody know how much of the Green Tech® cashgrab went to Tesla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Anybody know how much of the Green Tech® cashgrab went to Tesla What is 465 million (wasted ) dollars, Alex ? Now could I have Corporate Corruption in 2012 for $ 1,000 ? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/22/bonuses-given-after-raises-at-solyndra/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/22/bonuses-given-after-raises-at-solyndra/ Trivial amount of money in comparison to the loan. But still amusing after the ridiculous whining over AIG bonuses, which were likewise trivial in comparison to the bailout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Trivial amount of money in comparison to the loan. But still amusing after the ridiculous whining over AIG bonuses, which were likewise trivial in comparison to the bailout. Yes, it is a trivial amount but giving pay raises and bonuses with what is in effect public money after filing for bankruptcy somehow sticks in my craw. It's also pretty arrogant of them to even propose it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Yes, it is a trivial amount but giving pay raises and bonuses with what is in effect public money after filing for bankruptcy somehow sticks in my craw. It's also pretty arrogant of them to even propose it. And the same logic applies as did to AIG: you have to motivate your good people to stay around, an in a bankruptcy, that pretty much amounts to ponying up cash. I question whether or not Solyndra had good people to begin with...but the logic is sound otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/green-company-gets-390m-subsidies-lays-125/394051 It's like Groundhog's day all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 This Kennedy has it all figured out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 And the same logic applies as did to AIG: you have to motivate your good people to stay around, an in a bankruptcy, that pretty much amounts to ponying up cash. I question whether or not Solyndra had good people to begin with...but the logic is sound otherwise. I'd be fine with it, if those who got bonuses weren't allowed to leave the company....ever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 This Kennedy has it all figured out. It's disgusting. An excerpt from your link: "As investigative journalist Peter Schweizer reports in his new book, Throw Them All Out, 80 percent of all $20.5 billion in Department of Energy loans went to President Obama’s top donors, including such megarich one percenter Democrats as Google owners Larry Page and Sergey Brinn, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Ted Turner, John Doerr, and Al Gore." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 It's disgusting. An excerpt from your link: "As investigative journalist Peter Schweizer reports in his new book, Throw Them All Out, 80 percent of all $20.5 billion in Department of Energy loans went to President Obama's top donors, including such megarich one percenter Democrats as Google owners Larry Page and Sergey Brinn, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Ted Turner, John Doerr, and Al Gore." Sure. But it's just $16,400,000,000.00 and they're all good people promoting such a nobel cause. And it's "public money" anyway. Get with the program! Green energy is the new deity of the secular left. It's worshiped regularly at all their altars of political discourse. Their "Satan" is CO2 and it's as real a danger to the world in their eyes as Santorum's Devil incarnate - the evil prince is to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 It's disgusting. An excerpt from your link: "As investigative journalist Peter Schweizer reports in his new book, Throw Them All Out, 80 percent of all $20.5 billion in Department of Energy loans went to President Obama’s top donors, including such megarich one percenter Democrats as Google owners Larry Page and Sergey Brinn, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Ted Turner, John Doerr, and Al Gore." Except you're forgetting one thing: if you're someone starting a green energy company, what's your political leaning more likely to be? Or, to put it another way, how many Republicans do you think own green energy companies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Except you're forgetting one thing: if you're someone starting a green energy company, what's your political leaning more likely to be? Or, to put it another way, how many Republicans do you think own green energy companies? The emphasis is on the word donor not party affiliation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 The emphasis is on the word donor not party affiliation. Oh...okay. Donors aren't going to have a party affiliation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Oh...okay. Donors aren't going to have a party affiliation. Quit being a prick. Big donors to Obama & the dems got 80% of DOE's 20.5 billion in loans. That's not just some natural order of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts