/dev/null Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 http://www.cnbc.com/id/40642816 This one will end up before the Supreme Court eventually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 So they do not like the government telling someone that they have to have insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 So they do not like the government telling someone that they have to have insurance. Why do I sense an idiotic comparison to car insurance coming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 http://www.cnbc.com/id/40642816 This one will end up before the Supreme Court eventually It'll be interesting to see whether Kagan recuses herself when that happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 SONOFABITCH ACTIVIST JUDGES TELLING ME WHAT TO DO AND VIOLATING RIGHTS THIS IS AN OUTRAGE.....AHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wait....I AGREE with this. Nevermind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Why do I sense an idiotic comparison to car insurance coming? You must be considering the source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Why do I sense an idiotic comparison to car insurance coming? Nope, just find it funny how they same people will B word and moan about people going to the ER without insurance and having that trickle down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Nope, just find it funny how they same people will B word and moan about people going to the ER without insurance and having that trickle down. The idea of someone just getting a bill and paying for their own **** is just so "foreign" to you, isnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 So they do not like the government telling someone that they have to have insurance. So is that to say you think it's a good idea that your government FORCES you to purchase something? And you think that if people DON'T buy this product, it's okay for the government to DEDUCT money from that person's taxes as punishment?? You're good with all that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 The idea of someone just getting a bill and paying for their own **** is just so "foreign" to you, isnt it? How so jackass? I have no problem paying for my own crap. Fact of the matter is that people abuse the system and come into ERs for basically free service. How do you combat that. Personally I have absolutely no problem with the government telling people to covered by some sort of health insurance. So is that to say you think it's a good idea that your government FORCES you to purchase something? And you think that if people DON'T buy this product, it's okay for the government to DEDUCT money from that person's taxes as punishment?? You're good with all that? Yup! I have no problem with that. You have a problem with the Government telling you to purchase something yet you drive a car/truck right. Maybe there is no monetary penalty, but there is a penalty. You won't be able to drive that car right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 The idea of helping people is just so "foreign" to you, isnt it? Projecting again, are we? Let's not pretend you give a flying !@#$ about helping anyone. You want the government to take from others to dole out the help so you can feel good about being part of the solution without having to put yourself at a "comparative disadvantage". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Projecting again, are we? Let's not pretend you give a flying !@#$ about helping anyone. You want the government to take from others to dole out the help so you can feel good about being part of the solution without having to put yourself at a "comparative disadvantage". HAHAHAHA Here is the evil government nonsense. The government is always out to get us, to take our freedoms and money away from us. AHHHHHH, run away. RUN AWAY!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 (edited) Why do I sense an idiotic comparison to car insurance coming? Yup! I have no problem with that. You have a problem with the Government telling you to purchase something yet you drive a car/truck right. Maybe there is no monetary penalty, but there is a penalty. You won't be able to drive that car right? The retardation temptation was too much for him. Edited December 13, 2010 by Rob's House Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 The retardation temptation was too much for him. Seriously Rob... the government is not coming to get you. Just relax. Also, you are happy to be told by the state which you live that you HAVE to have car insurance in order to register your car in that state? You don't mind the state government telling you what you have to do? Have a good night Rob. Sleep well, the government will not be trying to take your pillows from you or tell you which ones to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Seriously Rob... the government is not coming to get you. Just relax. Also, you are happy to be told by the state which you live that you HAVE to have car insurance in order to register your car in that state? You don't mind the state government telling you what you have to do? Actually I could pay the uninsured motorist fee through DMV. Plus that is for liability in case you injur someone else. And you are only required to pay it if you choose to drive a motor vehicle, not just for being alive. Privilege to drive v. right to life; there is a subtle difference there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 (edited) HAHAHAHA Here is the evil government nonsense. The government is always out to get us, to take our freedoms and money away from us. AHHHHHH, run away. RUN AWAY!!! No the government is not out to get us, just out to get our money. Every thing the government gets involved with is a financial disaster. USPS, AMTRAK, SS and Medcare/medicaid. The bureaucracy gets in the way, after they create a department and hire all the $100k managers they need more funding to do what they set out to do. Why can't you see that heathcare will be the same? Here is a prime example. The US Department of Energy budget. http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/10budget/Content/Highlights/FY2010Highlights.pdf on page 14, total corporate management $383,202,000 Do you really think this is economical? Edited December 13, 2010 by Gary M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Seriously Rob... the government is not coming to get you. Just relax. Also, you are happy to be told by the state which you live that you HAVE to have car insurance in order to register your car in that state? You don't mind the state government telling you what you have to do? Have a good night Rob. Sleep well, the government will not be trying to take your pillows from you or tell you which ones to use. You don't see the difference between "You have to have health insurance" and "You have to have car insurance IN ORDER TO have a car"? Hint: one's a trade-off. The other's a friggin' mandate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 You don't see the difference between "You have to have health insurance" and "You have to have car insurance IN ORDER TO have a car"? Hint: one's a trade-off. The other's a friggin' mandate. Of course he doesn't see the difference, that isn't what he was told by his masters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 I do give a flying !@#$ about helping people. Universal HC is a well proven system around the world with a long history of success. It's a great system that allows for everyone to have access to health services. I do not like that our poor and unfortunate have to avoid the hospital due to the fact that their parent were broke. You hate children just as much as you hate facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts