Jump to content

Football Outsider says: pick top-ten RB over OT


Recommended Posts

3 rbs picked in the top 10 over the last 25 years have won Super Bowls: Reggie Bush (who was mainly a decoy), Jamal Lewis (who played on one of the greatest defensive teams ever and on an offense that didn't score a td for a month), and Marshall Faulk (who was traded before he won one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 rbs picked in the top 10 over the last 25 years have won Super Bowls: Reggie Bush (who was mainly a decoy), Jamal Lewis (who played on one of the greatest defensive teams ever and on an offense that didn't score a td for a month), and Marshall Faulk (who was traded before he won one).

 

THAT is what you think is the meaningful measurable for a first round pick? Superbowl wins??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THAT is what you think is the meaningful measurable for a first round pick? Superbowl wins??

 

 

It proves the point that if you build your team around a high profile running back, you aren't going to win a Super Bowl. Isn't that the goal of building a team? And drafting a rb in the top 10 is even more follish when you already have 2 1,000 yard rushers on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It proves the point that if you build your team around a high profile running back, you aren't going to win a Super Bowl. Isn't that the goal of building a team? And drafting a rb in the top 10 is even more follish when you already have 2 1,000 yard rushers on the roster.

 

How many QBs drafted in the top 10 in that same period won superbowls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The common denominator is that all the teams that were used as examples had average or below average quarterbacks for the years cited.

 

Or that teams that have picks in the top 10, take longer to rebuild than the the average NFL career for a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It proves the point that if you build your team around a high profile running back, you aren't going to win a Super Bowl. Isn't that the goal of building a team? And drafting a rb in the top 10 is even more follish when you already have 2 1,000 yard rushers on the roster.

 

It absolutely does NOT prove that point. In fact, you've just posited a complete logical fallacy. And Reggie Bush just won a Super Bowl, so there's your "black swan."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It proves the point that if you build your team around a high profile running back, you aren't going to win a Super Bowl. Isn't that the goal of building a team? And drafting a rb in the top 10 is even more follish when you already have 2 1,000 yard rushers on the roster.

You conveniently forgot to include the entire first round. That leaves out Emmitt Smith, Jerome Bettis, Corey Dillon, Joseph Addai, and OJ Anderson. Also, Walter Payton, a 4th overall pick, won a SB ring 25 years ago. Finally, Jamal Lewis was the most productive offensive player on the field in the Ravens-Giants Super Bowl, and rushed for over 1300 yards that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry Sanders did.

No he didn't. Lomas Brown, Glover, etc.... were pretty good. Just cause the media says Barry Sanders did it all himself and that Wayne Fontes is a buffoon doesn't make either true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...