Lurker

I know they'll get a few important guys back in a few weeks, but I can't see Pittsburgh being a playoff threat with this D...

Yeah, that secondary is toast...

INdeed...

Probably not. But I wonder what Buffett thinks about "dime a dozen" columnists? Sully should voluntarily add 50% to his Guild dues and thank his lucky stars he's "protected"...

I won't tune in (I don't watch any TV outside of actual games) but he's the first coach worth watching if I did...

Big whoop. The more important ranking will be the one after week 17...

I'll hold off voting until Dareus is re-signed...

...which is at an all-time low.

True. But what did the Ravens get out of it?

Wait for the national media to have a field day on this though ("Bills not sold on unproven TT, bring back verteran"..."QB chaos in Buffalo"..."TT, what do you think about this move?" and on and on). TT better have blinders on and live in a soundproof room until Sunday...

I should hope so. This is not a distraction they need this week...

Most likely, and they'll get nothing for him. Very frustrating...

Yep. It's pretty evident now that he's the odd man out.

Going against the prevailing sentiment here, neither am I. Not sure how E.J being the number three helps his development. Will running the scout team be enough to keep him on the upward path he took this year? That's a major question for me right now. I'd much rather have E.J. suited up on game day and absorbing the live action, even if he's holding a clipboard. Sitting in the pressbox, removed from his teammates is not development, IMO...

It's the limited number of comparables. They're like realtors--they don't how to value a guy like TT since there've been so few QBs that have taken the same route...

Atleast this POV makes some sense.... http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2558568-the-qb-nonsense-index-a-banner-year-for-absurd-qb-storylines/page/5

Yes, but to be fair, Rogers is not a read option guy. He's a good runner, but he'd never be used on a designed run play...

Great work. Essentially a meaningless formula...

Uh. I wouldn't count the starter as 'good depth'...

Rogue, baby, Rogue... http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/07/report-grigson-makes-decisions-against-paganos-wishes/

This had better not go beyond tomorrow. It will be a distraction once they get into installing the gameplan on Wednesday, IMO...

How do youu figure? The Titan's backup C is 6th round pick from this year's draft who went to that football powerhouse, Boston College: http://www.titansonline.com/team/roster/Andy-Gallik/f50613b4-85ef-4a6b-b104-f3199fb4b00a

Someone will have to go when McLuv'n is reactivated...

I think they'll be good but maybe not do as well statistically. The high risk / high reward nature of Rex's scheme will open them up to big play's. Then again, outside of Luck, Brady, Eli, Romo and possibly Tannehill, the QBs they'll face aren't that scary...