-
Posts
71,391 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by DC Tom
-
Game of Thrones - And Now Our Watch Has Ended!
DC Tom replied to SlimShady'sSpaceForce's topic in Off the Wall Archives
If Bronn's ever offered money to kill Tyrion, he'll double it. -
What is everyone paying for a haircut these days?
DC Tom replied to SDS's topic in Off the Wall Archives
$25+tip. I actually know a place that's $15, which has got to be the cheapest cut in DC. I tell my wife not to try to save money on her hair and nails. Because I know she enjoys it, and I know I'll hear about it for the rest of my life if she skimps on it. -
You must have sound on.
-
"Best campaign?" Is that the one where she called half the country a "basket of deplorables" and didn't bother to campaign in Wisconsin?
-
Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread
DC Tom replied to snafu's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
My family reunions draw a bigger crowd. -
Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread
DC Tom replied to snafu's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It's only wrong when the orange cis-male patriarchy says it. -
ADAM SCHIFF SAYS DONALD TRUMP 'BETRAYS OUR NATIONAL SECURITY' AFTER PRESIDENT DISCUSSED 'RUSSIAN HOAX' WITH PUTIN Did he claim he'd have more flexibility after the election? Somebody get Schiff some Clonazapem already.
-
Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread
DC Tom replied to snafu's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
No, first rule of tech is: is it plugged in? Second rule is: is it on? -
The "National Emergency" Thread
DC Tom replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
For the record, a "credible fear interview" is an interview done by an asylum officer to determine if the petitioner has a credible fear of torture or violence against them if returned to their country. I want to specify that, because I am certain that some halfwit somewhere is going to claim the purpose is to intimidate the petitioner into not requesting asylum. And there's no realistic way this should be challenged: the determination of who is and is not an asylum officer is solely at the discretion of DHS. There is nothing that says only USCIS officers can perform the function. It's not even in the CFR. DHS could take someone from the Countering WMD branch and make them an asylum officer if they wanted. Of course, it'll be challenged, on the grounds of "I'm gonna jump up and down and hold my breath until I get my way!" But there's no realistic way it should be. -
Are Tucker Carlson's Day's Numbered On Fox?
DC Tom replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Do I give a *****? C'mon...you're not new here, you idiot. Don't be a crybaby. -
Are Tucker Carlson's Day's Numbered On Fox?
DC Tom replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
And it was a dead dumb thread until you resurrected it, dumbass. -
Big deal. He's not winning CA anyway. But let's see how far this ridiculous idea goes.
-
The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:
DC Tom replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Yeah, I'm not taking that at face value on just a tweet. -
But the one-legged bi-curious mulatto dwarf demographic is still underemployed!
-
Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread
DC Tom replied to snafu's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The clown car has a hood ornament... Egyptian Mummy in the front, party in the back. -
All Roads Lead to the Ukraine
DC Tom replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446 I was going to select a choice quote, but you have to read the whole thing. The summary is that "The Democrats colluded with the Ukraine to undermine Trump." -
The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:
DC Tom replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That was clear Tuesday night... -
Two important points to be stressed here: 1) The Senate Democrats stopped looking in to the "Russian collusion" accusations. They even stopped looking in to the "obstruction" accusations. They've now moved on to looking at "Barr perjury" accusations. The key here being: they're still looking for wrong-doing. 2) Barr has NO say in impeachment. That's purely a legislative function. They don't need him, at all. Or need to tear him down. So why even bother with this like of attack? (The answer being: because this isn't about impeachment.)
-
Social Security running out of money and time
DC Tom replied to /dev/null's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That's good, because that's probably how I'm going to be spending my Social Security years. -
Additionally, the letter was not the only communication. There was apparently further communication - a call between Barr and Mueller - where Mueller clarified his concern was misinterpretation of the summary by the media and public, and that he had no concerns with the content of the summary. This was both written up in the news articles the Democrats had based their questioning on, and testified to by Narr. Given that, Barr's statement that he wasn't aware of concerns on Mueller's part is entirely truthful, since he had explicit confirmation from Mueller that he had no concerns.