Jump to content

DC Tom

Community Member
  • Posts

    71,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DC Tom

  1. It's jointly held, with Chelsea. Now that the Clinton Foundation's donations are drying up and they're under federal investigation, I can't help wondering if it isn't some vehicle for laundering donations for Chelsea from their Hollywood supporters.
  2. They have a harder stance on their southern border than we have on ours. They don't have the resources to enforce it. Tariffs are not likely to help that, I'm guessing.
  3. I'm trying to provide you factual information, to cure your willful ignorance, you racist turd. 300 lawyers who don't understand the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Senate's rights are simply 400 lawyers who are wrong. This, more than your bigotry, is why you should have your teaching license revoked. You not only make arguments to authority, you make badly stupid ones.
  4. They're all wrong. The Constitution specifies that once the Senate receives the nomination, the rules governing "advice and consent" are solely at the discretion of the Senate. The Supreme Court has upheld this multiple times. And nowhere in the Senate bylaws does it say that the nomination must get an up-and-down vote. Someone quote me, so this racist (*^*&%^$^#can see it. He's got me blocked.
  5. Northam literally made a case for "post-birth abortion." I still think he misspoke, off-the-cuff in response to an unanticipated question in a radio interview, and didn't mean what he said. But he sure as shitfire said it. Worse, when called out, Democrats, instead of saying "He stated himself poorly," chose to defend him with condescending "War on women!" nonsense. Which they now flat-out choose to deny even happened. They took an error and made it in to an odious, even evil, policy position.
  6. Yeah, it wasn't unconstitutional, by any stretch. "Advice and consent" begins when the nomination is received by the Senate chair. Constitutionally, it does not require anything further than that. So sayeth the Supreme Court. It was craven and childish, but not unconstitutional.
  7. Looks like Guardians of the Galaxy 3 is in trouble again. Goddammit, can't anyone on that production just keep their mouths shut?
  8. They have a monitoring system on the bridge that will warn authorities if any driver yawns more than three times in 20 seconds.
  9. No *****. That's why Trump only provided written answers to questions. All-white paintings can actually go for a lot... https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2014-11-14/why-pay-15-million-for-a-white-canvas
  10. Then that should have been your counter-argument to @reddogblitz, because the quote he cherry-picked certainly doesn't say that.
  11. That is a real stretch, considering that "state governments" in that context never in my memory refers to "foreign states." She didn't ignore them. She called them "deplorables."
  12. Is she going to be pissed when she finds out how many landlords and government contractors profit off Section 8.
  13. I can't imagine the exquisite hell they're going to go through filing an insurance claim for the damage...
  14. Most of the surge in illegal immigration is coming through Mexico from Nicaragua, El Salvator, and...Honduras, I think. Tariffs on Mexico, while a stupid idea, probably aren't going to cause an appreciable uptick at the border.
  15. Because we weren't running a budget deficit before the tax cuts. So I'm sure that'll cover it. And this dingbat's on the Senate Banking Committee.
  16. Excluding right-wing sites like National Review, there are seven different stories about her in the news today. "The QANON crowd" aren't the people hung up on her.
  17. It's because they've been misled. Congress needs to do what's right, not what's popular. That's why we elect people like AOC to represent us - they know better than we do what has to be done.
  18. The androids wouldn't last 15 minutes against his relentless "Double dumbass pork chop on you!" retorts.
  19. Really? Where can I buy an unregulated machine gun on the internet?
  20. "We understand that the change in standard payment terms could impact your business, However, we are making this change to be better aligned with our corporate requirements." Translation: it's our money, you're our *****, so ***** you. The one time I hope for unionization: let the freelancers form a guild and collectively counter with "Net 30, or suck it." Net 90 is bull####.
  21. Oh, there’s plenty of jiving. . Perhaps he needs to appoint Barbara Billingsley as a special investigator.
  22. Here's the report: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html Point out where it was whitewashed, please.
×
×
  • Create New...