Jump to content

Chilly

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chilly

  1. I'm thinking Chambers. Portis is worrying me, I'm not sure he can survive many more seasons in the NFL. If it was another top back besides Portis, you always take the RB, but injury concerns do play a part.
  2. Jackson. He's worth more imo because his receiving skills out-match Rudi's. Depending on your scoring system, you could look at Manning as well. Again, though, thats really dependant on your scoring system.
  3. Makes *much* more sense. Considering that, I like what you did with it. Not sure if you could have done much better. Yeah, Deangelo is going to tear sh-- up in Carolina.
  4. Its so unimportant they ran a story on it!
  5. Dats good, wouldn't want you to be without a sense of humor or understanding of famous intarweb pictars would we?
  6. I'd bet you could get a Witten TE a bit later then that, but overall great draft. Lamont Jordan is WAY underrated, I think he's gonna have a better season then Portis this year, and will be a top 5-7 RB fantasy wise.
  7. A company, like the NYT, is going to do what gets them the most money with the minimal costs. I don't hold the NYT to any ethical standard because I don't think that they, like most companies, have one. There was no benefit for them to publish this story in the UK and risk legal costs and action against them. Erm, tracking cookies and IP addresses are two completely different things. NYT filtering it out based on IP doesn't have anything to do with tracking users unless further technology was involved, which I haven't heard anything of. Now if they had put a tracking cookie on each person's computer to see the other websites they were visitng then yeah, I'd have a problem with it. But filtering it out based upon IP is not only the most logical way to filter one country from your content, but it also doesn't have anything to do with tracking user's habits.
  8. Uh, the article seems pretty fair as to why they did it. Whats wrong with them covering their own ass, exactly? Take off the tin foil. IP addresses and where they originate from are completely public information. Any good forum software, such as this one, tracks what IP address/addresses you use, for purposes of banning/identifying users. There is absolutely NOTHING for privacy advocates to get their panties in a knot about.
  9. Heh, thats one of the things I thought was bad about your analysis. Its not big enough to take all of the other factors into account eh?
  10. Do you lean Democratic or Republican?
  11. How do you view yourself?
  12. It would be a fair statement that if you are not a Republican, you lean republican, would it not?
  13. And thus, the party ID theory continues to hold true.
  14. Hahaha. http://www.ggl.com/news.php?NewsId=3886&Page=5
  15. Zucker Abrahams Zucker > RL
  16. Practice makes perfect, eh?
  17. Atlanta and Miami? Right, they're the ones who go to the games when the teams are bad.
  18. It's because Billy hasn't looked very good in camp. Vince was never supposed to be the starter this year, and the Titans realized that (hence the plan to start Volek). However, everything I've read indicates Volek has had a horrific camp, which promoted the Collins signing.
  19. Doesn't the correlation only show that improving your offensive line through the first two rounds helps a team? It doesn't include free agents or lower round draft picks!
  20. Interesting news. http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/players/playerpage/235216
  21. There are only 3 teams that I love, and I love them all equally. Bills, Sabres, and the Longhorns.
  22. Did you look at the date this was originally posted?
×
×
  • Create New...