SectionC3

Of all of the Republican giveaways health care is where the line is drawn. Interesting. Maybe, then, the paths to negotiate and to phase out subsidies at a lower income cap. But Republicans won’t do that. Of course, you know all of this, Anus Man.

Of course, the Republicans could end this now, too. But you left that part out, Anus Man.

The quote is what it is. I read “no plans.”

My vibe is we're winning this game. Enough playing with our food. Time to get real.

He made the tackles he was supposed to make. Huge improvement.

My reading comprehension is pretty good. You should read the HC’s quote. There is a difference between “not” and “no plans.”

Earned by both of them. This year.

Fair point. I’ll count the laser on Detroit on Thanksgiving. That chiefs one, though … ouch,

The best deep balls were the dimes to Diggs in the wind game and in the KC playoff game. And Diggs dropped them both.

Better than free money on that 2.6pc cut to earners over 626k that you lap up, Anus Man.

Is that across the board like you tax giveaway, Anus Man? Or just to those who don’t have employer-sponsored or group insurance? And yet Trump cannot rid us of this “unpopular” program. Nine years and counting and still no plan to repeal and replace.

Hoax. People like Obamacare. That’s why Trump Can’t get his “repeal and replace” done. It’s only been, what, nine years since he started talking about it. What’s your point, Anus Man? This is when these things expire. Either compromise or don’t. Or just keep on keeping on with the tax giveaways to the rich while raising health care costs for everyday Americans.

Hoax. Gender surgery has nothing to do with this. The dispute considers ACA subsidies. Republicans want to let them expire. Democrats don’t, and are holding out for a deal on that issue. So if you want more expensive health insurance, then be mad a Democrats. But if you think that the $20b we sent Argentina and the tax cuts for the rich should have instead been dedicated to reducing the expense of health care for ordinary Americans, the call your MAGA rep or drop a comment in the Alex Jones Twitter feed.

Hoax.

The quote is “no plans.” That is different from “not.”

"No plans" is vastly different from "not."

He doesn't need to. But others do. Not that MAGA stands for anything other than selfishness.

My hope is that Daboll gets canned soon and, having buried the hatchet (I think, from what I heard) with Sean, comes back here to hang for the rest of the season as a consultant to lend a fresh set of eyes and spice things up a bit. Having said that, and having seen who the Giants have on staff, there's no way they should fire him before the end of the year unless Dart gets hurt and can't play.

I stand by my view that he was concussed against NE. Also, it’s not an issue when Cook is going for 216, but I do feel like he sees the field better from the gun. Getting to the line faster to allow Brady to help in his ear might be a good idea.

Two things - Palmer’s snap count was low to begin with. And, importantly, even without him they have to try something downfield. The sweet spot is second and short. They just have to try at some Point to loosen things up. I lied. Theres three things. That scramble drill yesterday where the earth moved a great distance around the sun and nobody got open is precisely why Gabe should be in the roster when healthy. He’s good at that, and he can replace the redundant nothingness of one of Moore/Samuel.

If they can find the right fit (schematic, contract, and term), I’d sink a 2+3 or a 1 into a WR. We cant draft them well anyways. And I look at it like this: would i prefer, say, Jordan Addison or the combinations of Dewayne Carter/Keon Coleman TJ Sanders/Landon Jackson? It’s Addison all day long.

And in the second half against NO.

That's a good thing if it's true. The problem is that there isn't much reshoring going on (I appreciate it's early in this initiative). And, to my further understanding, the trade deficit is actually growing. (Although I question whether any economic data from this administration is accurate.) Meanwhile, these idiotic tariffs are a significant tax increase on American consumers, and those costs are really going to start to hit as companies stop absorbing some of those costs.

I wouldn't be surprised to see that. Poyer back home in the box. Hancock plays the free role. And see what happens. It's hard for that combo to be worse than Rapp Bishop.

What's included in that calculation? Intellectual services (e.g., Web services, engineering, etc.)? I don't think it is. Assuming it's not, the deficit number isn't as bad as one thinks, and the idea of upending the economy so we can make disposable razors and ball point pens here again is just friggin stupid. Are you outpacing foreign markets?