SectionC3

A little more misogyny from Irv. A moderator should know better.

Watch what? The name-calling and the misogyny? That’s you. Go back and take a look. And, the fact that a MAGA member is threatening censorship of an opinion he doesn’t like is just rich.

Hoax. I haven’t. Although it’s nice to see you aren’t name-calling today. A bad example to set for anyone. And a particularly bad example to set if the name-caller happens to be a moderator of this genteel corner of the internet.

Your suspicion is one that I would prefer not to test. And, irrespective of whether you’re right on that point, there’s no excuse for having the nuke codes in a box in the kitsch resort home of a private citizen. I don’t know about hanging him. But I completely agree with the rest of what you said. Those are facts. And, I have to say, the thought of a prison barber shaving his head and someone squirting him with a hose to cleanse him upon entry to a federal penitentiary makes me chuckle a bit.

Hoax. Biden doesn’t pal around with dictators. Unlike your dear leader.

Hoax. There was a story recently — I believe on TV — that a rando wandered into mar a lago through a beach tunnel. Not a good look for anyone.

Nice job. A little misogyny to start the evening. This forum lets you moderate? What a mess. Hoax. Libs don’t want to defund the FBI. They’re also not casual about the safeguarding of state secrets. MAGA, on the other hand, attacks the blue and is fine with the possibility that Chinese agents could obtain our sensitive intelligence.

Hoax. You know exactly what I’m talking about.

Hoax. I’m not being funny about this, but it’s a resort, right? Meaning that there are all sorts of members and maybe even transients who have access to the grounds. This is far different from some stuff being found at, say, Jimmy Carter’s modest home in Georgia.

So, by extension, when classified docs are at the home of a private citizen, the government goes to get them back, right? Fix the security breach.

It was dangerous to the extent certain people pitched it as effective when, it point of fact, for COVID purposes it was not. False sense of security. And I suppose that was the hoax with respect to HCQ. Some people—like you—were bamboozled into thinking it was an effective COVID treatment, when the truth is that there’s nothing that supports that point.

It’s repetitive but true. Hoax.

“[I]n deference to you all.” Wow. Nice work insulting everyone here, including your MAGA pals. Looks like HCQ is ineffective both with respect to COVID and the taming of a massive ego.

You haven’t posted about HCQ in awhile, so the hoax per post ratio on this board has gone down a little bit lately.

Lots of hoaxes here. Neither Hunter nor Don has been convicted of a relevant crime. Time May change that. Or people like you may try to defund the FBI to stymie the investigation of what appears to be this breach of national security. Sad. But not surprising, coming from MAGA.

Hoax. Also, the two wrongs make a right theorem doesn’t apply past second grade. Unless you’re MAGA, I guess. We can’t rule it in or out at this point. But it wouldn’t shock me, for what it’s worth. Not to say I expect that outcome, but I wouldn’t be stunned if we learned later that he had executed such a transaction.

Hoax. They’re not the ones excusing the misuse and misappropriation of our nation’s most sensitive secrets. And yet none of those people secreted them for an extended period in a place accessible to foreign agents. For awhile in a room without a lock. (Again, assuming the nuke codes were in the bundle of things Trump mishandled, which at this point seems to be the operative belief.)

Amen, brother. Quintessential d-bags those two are. Neither would be good. But do we want adversaries (or allies, for that matter), knowing how we code nuclear launches? I would think not, lest these things have degrading intelligence classifications based on age and utility. And, hoax as to “the” national security issue. There can be more than one such issue with respect to these documents. Frankly, from what little we know about this mess, there are multiple such issues (the FPOTUS retaining these things, and somebody not getting them back quickly enough, for starters).

Hoax. And you haven’t denied that you you want to defund the FBI. Back the blue, unless it’s the FBI, right?

He’s slow AF and we have Morris his reps with the 2s last week.

Yeah, they used him a lot on runs/screens last year. IIRC, he and McKenzie were a package for some of that. It was to the point that, every time Kumerow hit the field, I’d think it was a run. I also wondered wither Daboll was setting up a shot play all year with that package. I *think* we eventually took the shot, but didn’t complete the pass.

That was witty. Hoax. Maybe you can remember how to lead by example. Seems like “they” will let anyone moderate these days.

Sit tight. Let the investigation work itself out. And, the reality is, whether you want to admit it or not, Trump is a significant target in a pretty significant national security investigation undertaken by the FBI. Maybe you want to defund the FBI so that it can’t continue to protect our national security. I don’t. It’s just one of the many ways in which we’re different.

If they cut him based on those savings (assuming your math is right, which I have no reason to doubt), then I wonder if he’s a toxic attitude that we don’t want near our locker room.

It's not me that MAGA needs to worry about. It's the FBI. And it seems like Trump is in it pretty deep.