GG

Didn't know the angle to that story. Was bummed at first at the quick turnaround, now understand why it happened

This is all you need to know - This FBI corruption story is getting more press.

Coney Island is not a single theme park, I think there are 3 separate ride operators there and that's why you can't get a full package wristband. Wouldn't be worth it anyway. The only thing worthwhile in Luna Park is the Cyclone. The rest of the grown up ride are in the other parks in Coney Island, but just next to Luna Park. It's a great full day trip if you schedule it right - time it with a day Cyclones game and a night concert at the Ford ampitheater.

You forgot the squak!

Yup, but I really wanted the dude to do his own homework.

How about looking up and linking the study itself? Hint, it took less than 4 clicks.

I don't believe it because True Pundit is a fake news site according to the authorities at Oxford.

At least hold up a boom box with Gabriel on

Apparently neither has the big news outlets, because it's not being reported at all. Maybe it doesn't really exist.

Speaking of lazy takes. Why not examine individual performances? In 2017 Woods' production increased by 50% over his career averages. Watkins declined because he was the 3rd option.

Correct. It wasn't a good WR cast, but also unfair to call them the worst considering who was throwing it to them. He was under contract, but his agent was allowed to go shopping, and after two months of insisting they won't restructure his contract, they agreed to a $10 million pay cut. How many starting QBs accept that? Yup, it's my fault that you misuse stats. Why have Matthews' numbers plummeted playing with Taylor, while Woods' & Goodwin's numbers improved while playing away from Taylor?

1996 was a typo, I meant to write 1995. The WR group was pretty sorry that year, especially hurt by Reed's injury. And please don't fall into BADOL's trap of citing statistics that have nohing to do with the quality of the WR corps (which is what the topic is). Unless you also want to say that Tyrod is as good a quarterback as Jim Kelly. Cue BADOL to remind us that Tyrod put up the best Bills offensive numbers in nearly 2 decades, but for whatever reason not a single QB-starved team wanted him last year, and he may not even get a 4th round draft choice in return if traded this year. Odd how he knows more than the collective NFL.

I'm an obnoxious prick to idiots who can't even process the context of videos they post on this site. I suggest that you watch the first 90 seconds of that video again and see if Gowdy says what you claim it does.

Are you constantly stoned? That wasn't the question that he answered. He answered the question about the Mueller investigation, and said that the Mueller investigation has nothing to do with the dossier. He did not at all address a COMPLETELY SEARATE ISSUE of whether there would have been a FISA warrant without the dossier. You're not really good at this, are you?

Yeah, but that could be President of anything

And if I told you that the survey itself is biased and full of crap, what would you say?

Is this another example of you standing up for proper context in a story? That would go something like, hey how about a link to the survey itself and the methodology?

This will prompt another rule change by the league. The only reason this happened is that McDaniels couldn't formally sign while Pats* were still in the playoffs. That rule already puts teams waiting on these assistants in the waiting penalty box. Now that Kraft pulled another shady move on another franchise, I expect the other owners to address this. Kraft better believe that karma doesn't exist

But devoid of full context

Seriously?

So, NOW context matters?

Who here is saying that? The preponderance of the discussion focuses on the fact that despite over a year of Russia collusion hysteria, there hasn't been a shred of hard evidence presented or even hinted. Schiff's trolling by the Ukranian disk jockeys is a far greater transgression than anything that we've seen from the Trump camp. Mots of the complaints about Mueller's investigation is that he won't find anything about collusion, but will need to save face by finding dirt about something completely unrelated. Look up Scooter Libby & blue dress for past examples.

Look on the bright side, Trump is making liberals consider the cost of things.

If that's your take-away from these discussions, then you're more stoned than we thought. Many people participating in these discussions think Trump is an idiot, but are appalled that laws were apparently broken to rig the election. There's far more EVIDENCE that people inside the government broke laws than anything that resembles collusion with the Russians.

Funny how we're back into the definition game with people who have a hard time defenidng positions. So far, we need to reinterpret definitions of evidence and 2nd world countries. May as well start a new list.