Jump to content

GG

Community Member
  • Posts

    31,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GG

  1. Another type of Greggy-type article stash for people to connect the dots. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mayor-driver-intentionally-crashed-into-er-lit-self-aflame/
  2. A Fabio reference in 2018? Wowzers
  3. I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that you dismissed this theory a few weeks back.
  4. Bill Tobin is also a fan
  5. First you have to specify exactly what you're trying to prevent, because the solutions are dramatically different.
  6. Let me see if I get this straight. This virtual war started in 2014, was not countered until 2017, yet there's no CiC now?
  7. Add an element of herostratic fame and the profile is complete.
  8. Hey Greggy, nice of you to finally come around on the true Ukraine stories.
  9. I guess ratings don't count? It's becoming more clear that as indictments and Congressional reports are coming in, there's an increasing desperation from all of those who clung to their Russia collusion theory. It's also not a coincidence that there's an influx of drivebys in these threads recently. Where were you guys for the last six months? Keep clinging to your pet theories. They've served you well. Putin is very proud of his handy work.
  10. What in the world are you babbling about?
  11. Not quite. FB wouldn't have doubled down on their talking points if the pre-election impressions were equally effective. Never mind that if Putin cronies' goal was to help elect Trump, why did they increase FB placements AFTER the election?
  12. No it is not. Out of all the candidates, Hillary would have been the 2nd best for Putin (next to Bernie)
  13. Gee, look who's back for his annual beating. Remind me again how happy you were to share a bus with people of color in November 2008?
  14. Not quite. You cannot make a straight correlation based on what FB disclosed, because they didn't specify whether the pre-election ads were seen equally as the post-election ads. Again, based on the total meltdown on Nov. 7, I can make an argument that the post-election ads were much more impactful and they still feed the TDS beast.
  15. And how many of those 4.4 million impressions were in support of Bernie?
  16. Trump and family & values in the same sentence? Gotta give you guys credit for making up some funny stuff
  17. Just in time for the new season
  18. Why is that funny to you? Did you not see FB's VP of Ciommunications confirm that the ads were bought AFTER the election? I can even offer up anecdotal evidence that the level of angst on FB went into the stratosphere AFTER the election.
  19. This is why you're an insufferable fool. Once again, somebody asks you logical questions meant to stimulate dormant brain cells. Those questions have a specific point - that is to answer the question how a President's policies can affect global commodity prices. Your response is another, "So what? I don't care about your little facts." And way to misinterpret what Rosenstein meant. Russians moved onto Trump because he was the next man up, not because they favored him to win. A Trump presidency is much worse for Russia than a Hillary one.
  20. Can’t be a socialist. When was the last time you saw a fat socialist?
  21. Sort of. Manafort was working in Ukraine for Putin’s puppets. Probably not even a degree of separation. He wouldn’t if the morons here who don’t have him on ignore stop replying to him.
  22. Perhaps a 9-month long investigation that hasn't found one shred of collusion? The biggest indictment to date is something that everyone has been speculating about for nearly 2 years, and does not involve any collusion whatsoever. Meanwhile anything that's been disclosed by the various executive & legislative investigations point to many more issues by the previous administration than anything Trump has done.
  23. What's the term for a person who keeps clinging to a narrative, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary?
×
×
  • Create New...