GG

You can make a pterodactyl, but that's not important right now. That's a blatant cheap shot.

This population shows up in the statistics as the part timers who can’t get a full time job.

But it's actually the opposite of your theory. DiMarco's lining up all over the field did not affect how Jets defended the Bills. Notre how the offense started to produce once DiMarco's snaps were minimized in the 2nd half

It looked like they were deliberately targeting Levi

Imagine that, Promo in midseason homerist form This is the flip argument when Bills won 5 games only thanks to turnovers, while ignoring glaring warts.

Stop being an idiot. Josh Allen was and continues to be error-prone. He's still at a point where you can game plan around his shortcomings.

And you still fail to understand that the only reason Bills were finally able to score was a change in the play calls in 3Q. The turnovers were part of Jets' game plan. Listen to the Jets' players before the game. They knew that Allen was bound to make a mistake the longer he stays on the field. They were perfectly willing to give up 8 play drives because the odds say that Allen will make a mistake on a prolonged drive. They were right in the first half. Daboll played right into the defensive plan and strength.

Or for Shady to quietly sit on the sidelines for 2+ quarters before touching the ball in the season opener (BTW, is this thread The Dream Team sequel?)

The NFL is a results oriented business. The number of points scored and allowed are the only numbers that matter in this game. Jets' goal going into the game was to force Allen to play like a QB, which he didn't do all that well in the first half. Trying to find solace in hand picked statistics doesn't eliminate 0 points in nearly 3 quarters and no redzone trips until the 4th quarter. Totally agree that it's a matchup thing. My argument is that using DiMarco in the matchup thing for so many plays was detrimental and contributed to the anemic first half performance.

We couldn't believe he converted. Upon seeing the replay, I saw why. Just like the rest of the game, he is constantly moving forward, even when he's initially stopped. It's very hard to bring him down. You can make an argument that Poyer should have done a better job standing him up for Edmunds' clean up, or that Philips should have held on longer, but there's a reason Bell is among the best.

I'll concede the Foster injury. Then put McKenzie in there. You're hurting the matchups by splitting Dimarco wide. Now there's no reason for a anyone to worry about a deep throw to that side, and defense can cheat on the other players. The only reason you run that play is if the D forgets to cover him. There were a few opportunities when there wasn't a defender within 15 yards of him, but the Bills never snapped the ball quickly enough to have him that wide open.

Zero points through nearly 3 quarters is the epitome of anemic. Not hitting the red zone until the 4th quarter is anemic. The turnovers were all of the forced variety, meaning the Bills didn't move the ball at will. Jets' game plan was to force Allen into mistakes, which he did aplenty in the first half.

That's a complete misdirection. Once the field got shorter, Bills' O was forced into mistakes. Bills didn't hit the red zone until the fourth quarter. They didn't challenge Jets' secondary until late in 3Q. I don't know if it was by Daboll's design or not, but the Bills got lucky in this game and Daboll's designs in the first half should be scrutinized. You don't see McDaniels splitting Develin out wide for more than a play or two. I counted 6+ plays where DiMarco was the wideout. That's crazy against a weak secondary

I don't understand what you are getting at? Wait until you see All-22. There has to be a question of game plan design when you're playing against one of the best front 7s in the league with a very weak secondary, and Robert Foster is in for 14 plays, while DiMarco is in for a majority. And then you split out #42 wide multiple times? What's the most that play will gain you - 5 yards? It's good to see Daboll waking up and start calling plays that exploited Jets' weaknesses in mid 3Q

Looks like a lot of people are noticing problems with AT&T's merger splurge. Expect things to change in the future.

It was blatant. Clocked was usually stopped for 2-3 seconds on OB plays. I only focused on Bills' plays, don't know if it happened on Jets' drives.

Thanks for asking this. Everyone in the cheap seats were wondering the same. It looked like crossed the goal line. Watching the replay no. His whole body was outside the goal line! How could the ball be behind him?

I'd say Daboll's playcalling was responsible for the anemic 1st half. I'll wait until I see more on All-22, but I though Daboll was being too cute in the 1st half. I thought that they had too much motion to try to catch Jets off balance, but the Bills never snapped the ball to exploit the mismatches. In the first drive, a split out DiMarco was wide open for a while, but Jets recovered before the snap. My problem is that Daboll kept going back to that formation throughout the game, even as the Jets caught on. I understand that Daboll is trying to set the offense for the rest of the year, and hopefully they'll be able to exploit this movement once the offense gets more comfortable, but this was also game where the opponent had a very weak secondary, and Daboll didn't do enough to expose the real weakness. This game should not have been this close.

So much for the theory that pro players only care about the money.

This one is on Daboll. I don't understand the formations against a weak secondary.

Car packed. Next stop Lot 26. Woohoo !!!

What are the odds that Oliver doesn't make that shoestring tackle or Edmunds didn't learn on game film to put up his hands?

Perfect storm for AQ. They thought that by knocking down 2 buildings in downtown would cripple the US economy. And it kind of did, for 2 days. What they didn't know was that the collapse took down the vital underground communications lines between Verizon's hubs across the street and NYSE five blocks away and not affected by the collapse. They also didn't know that the collapse took down Bank of New York's data center and transmission lines, which were across the street from WTC7. BNY was a vital clearing agent (along with JPM/Chase) between the Fed and other banks, and its inability to transfer emergency funds for 1 day was a major cause for concern about banks' stability at the time. Luckily the backups were up and running on Day 3. You have to be some kind of super sleuth to know how all of these things interconnected and plan them precisely, without anyone before or after discovering the truth. Mind you, the conspiracists are relying on everyone still staying quiet, despite many of the first responders' best friends and families dying at the site, and then themselves contracting serious illnesses. WTC7 remains the one outlier, but it's faulty design over Greenwich Street is plausible cause of the collapse if there was enough damage to the lower floors. The building caves in right at that spot on the northeast end of the building. And, BTW there were no gold vaults in WTC7. If the moron conspirators would focus on the NYC emergency management, state agencies and the alphabet soup of federal intel agencies in the building, then you can question how the building may have met its demise. Otherwise, they're abject morons.

Interesting that you didn't highlight that all these events were caused by his actions.

He seriously needs to see a psychiatrist.