-
Posts
23,953 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by dave mcbride
-
I'll take Rosen 8 days a week, but I doubt the Bills will have the ammo in the form of picks to get him assuming Cleveland is dead set on getting a qb (which i guarantee you they will be). Basically, we need to root for SF to go into an even deeper tailspin and for gregg-o to inspire a decent cleveland defense to win a couple of games on their own.
-
I can't imagine him not going pro. He's really good and will be a top ten pick. Plus he will have graduated. Why on earth would he stay?
-
As a Bruins fan and alum, this is excellent news. Mora was terrible despite the winning early on.
-
Cleveland is taking a qb. I pretty much guarantee it.
-
Not sure you know who Ted Lowi was, but he was an extremely influential political scientist at Cornell (died last year) who stipulated the following: 'Professor Lowi acerbically coined what he called the “Law of Succession,” which holds that each new president enhances the reputation of his predecessors. He also posed a corollary: “This is the only certain contribution each president will make.”'
-
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Vis a vis Roman/Lynn: square peg and round hole. -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
That is mostly true, but I did add the qualifier "all else being equal." If a player is good (a big qualifier!), he will have multiple suitors willing to pay. -
Bills clueless about Tyrod Taylor article
dave mcbride replied to Comebackkid's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It makes sense to me. What he's saying is that because of how college offenses are run now, o-lineman and qbs come in woefully unprepared to operate in a pro-style offense. Smart coaches realize this and gameplan accordingly. The "traditional deficiencies" are substandard o-line play and weak quarterbacking beneath the elite tier, which is a product of all the spread offenses (which are very, very simple and succeed because of terrible secondary play at the college level). -
Bills clueless about Tyrod Taylor article
dave mcbride replied to Comebackkid's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Phenomenal piece. Thanks!! -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Something I read in Tim Graham's piece this morning stuck with me. He was speaking with someone in the league office about the situation, and that source told him that Taylor was a very popular player among other players around the league. Judging from how he interacts with other players from opposing teams after games, the fond feelings for him in Baltimore, Richard Sherman's comments, and his own rep as a gamer among his own teammates, I suspect that this is 100 percent true. That gets me to my next point: the current treatment of Taylor -- a far superior player to Peterman -- only makes sense if the decision-makers have a long time horizon to work with. Despite what people think here, I am not at all convinced of that. The problem is that Buffalo has become an even bigger laughing stock than before, and this regime will struggle to attract good players all else being equal (i.e., they have other offers) NEXT YEAR. I can't imagine good players will want to come here for not only the obvious reasons, but because of the stink (in the players' minds at least) of the Taylor decision (remember, other players actually like him). Why is that important? Because of the decisions of McDermott and Beane, this team will go into the 2018 offseason as one of the least talented teams in the league. Their talent level after free agency opens will be HORRIBLE--and again, I expect them to struggle in attracting quality FAs. Because of that, 2-14 is a real possibility next season. Taking a team that collectively went.500 over the previous three seasons to 6-10 (where they'll end up if Peterman starts the rest of the way) to somewhere between 2-14/4-12 is not a good look. If this happens, all talk of a long term for the new regime will go out the window. The fans will be in an uproar. They may well get a third season, but they'll struggle to advance from a really bad record to a really good one. The Rams did it this year, but they're the exception. Most teams that are bad stay bad for a couple of seasons. I'd bet a large amount of money if this regime has three straight losing seasons, they will be out. It's the way of this franchise. Completely cratering next season will not be a good look either. Remember, they will walk into FA with one of the lowest levels of talent in the league. The only decent players who won't be over the hill are as follows: Hyde, White, Shady, and Zay Jones (who does look like he can play). I have no idea what'll happen with Benjamin. He has leg issues and will cost a lot to keep. They don't seem to be committed to Glenn either. Clay is alright, but has knee issues and is basically a JAG at the TE position. Better than some but not great. Poyer is alright too. None of the other players on the team are difference makers. Given that they really have to trade the farm to move up and get a qb (although they may not), their draft pick total will be average by the time of draft day. I'd expect them to have to trade their 2 #1s plus a #2 and, say, a 3rd next year to move up from the 9-10 spot to the #2 spot. Cleveland will take a qb. -
Nate Peterman's performance against the Chargers
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Truth. -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Yep - he was kinda lucky to not have a sixth int. -
The Biggest Blunder of the Pegula Era
dave mcbride replied to Luka's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Re: Schwartz: the Eagles D is pretty dominating this year. First in the league against the run in both yardage and ypa. -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He is quietly having a spectacular season this year. He was amazing before he broke his finger last year too. He's a very underrated franchise QB. -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The Steelers went 15-1 in 2004, and Roethlisberger threw 17 TDs and 11 INTs. -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He had 3 - 16/37 for 205 yards. He did have a rushing TD. -
The issue for McDermott and Beane is that if this losing continues this season and they end up, say, 6-10, they are going to be set up to be terrible next year. They won't have an experienced QB, they'll have an exceptionally thin roster, and they'll really struggle to attract good free agents. Moreover, my guess is that we'll be starting fresh with a new OC. They could end up being very bad, and if they are, those two should worry about their jobs. They've put themselves in a bad situation with the talent desert that is this team, and I don't see how you can draft your way out of it quickly enough.
-
Dareus is killing it for the Jags
dave mcbride replied to Klaista2k's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
There needs to be a new Jersey Shore season centered around a character named "The Process." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sorrentino -
Nate Peterman's performance against the Chargers
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Hey - Peterman fumbled too! (He recovered it, however.) -
11-20: McDermott and Coordinator Pressers
dave mcbride replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
The player council is a jury of 12 and I suspect the verdict will be unanimous. -
11-20: McDermott and Coordinator Pressers
dave mcbride replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
But ... but ... spraying natural gas on the dumpster fire helps you blow it all up! -
Who starts next week: Taylor or Peterman?
dave mcbride replied to SDS's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Good take. I absolutely agree.