Jump to content

BillsFanForever19

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About BillsFanForever19

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Rochester, NY

Recent Profile Visitors

10,729 profile views

BillsFanForever19's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

7.2k

Reputation

  1. https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2025/08/27/nfl-practice-squad-rules-eligibility-waivers-vs-released/85843791007/ https://www.hogshaven.com/washington-commanders-roster/370983/how-it-works-nfl-practice-squad-rules-eligibility-salary-waivers-and-more https://www.buffalorumblings.com/buffalo-bills-roster/114203/what-do-nfl-practice-squad-rules-say-about-buffalo-bills-2025-roster https://broncoswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/broncos/2024/03/29/nfl-practice-squad-qb-unlimited-elevations-in-2024-rule/73142446007/ Again, even if you found something written that validated what you thought - how would you reconcile us activating Logue 3 times without signing him or releasing him? If what you're saying was reality, that couldn't have happened. And it did.
  2. We might be looking at Bass soon.
  3. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills at this point. You just keep on clapping back with incorrect points. In your defense here, that link is wrong. Either a typo or something they didn't update with the changes made before last season. Beyond the obvious proof that that is incorrect with the Week 2, Week 3, and Week 5 elevations this year of Zion Logue with no signing to the roster and no release from the Practice Squad - do a search of PS rules. Literally every single one says what you keep coming back with is incorrect: https://www.si.com/nfl/what-are-the-nfl-practice-squad-rules We literally have evidence this year on this very team that the bolded you keep arguing is incorrect. And you keep arguing against what has been proven. It's baffling.
  4. ... you've gotta stop, analyze, and verify before you post. Look at the year on the link you sent me. Now think about what year it is right now.
  5. Oh wow! Thanks for posting that. I had no idea. That's pretty wild. Lol. My guy. This is getting hilarious. He was never signed. He was never released from the Practice Squad. He was cut after Training Camp. Then they signed him to the Practice Squad. He has stayed there ever since. He was elevated 3 times. That's it. No release/waive involved. No signing. Just PS with 3 elevations.
  6. My dude, you just keep on getting it wrong. We never signed Zion Logue to the active roster this season. They were Practice Squad elevations each time. We've only signed Jordan Phillips and Phidarian Mathis to the active roster. The PS rules, the Logue elevations, who has been signed, and who hasn't been signed can all be found with simple google searches. Here is his complete transaction history with our team: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/transactions/_/id/90531/zion-logue
  7. All it takes is one injury to Palmer, Davis, or Shavers and he's back in the lineup. But if the plan is to not play him as long as all 3 are healthy (and I imagine that is the plan), all stay healthy, and that's it from him - you trade him. You don't sit a guy for half of the season (plus the Playoffs) voluntarily and expect to make things work next year. Even if that were a thing you'd do, Palmer and Shavers are under contract next season. Likely Gabe will be brought back so long as he stays healthy. And we'll almost assuredly look to add a potential WR1 in the off-season. There's really no place for him at that point.
  8. Also, not true. For example, we elevated Zion Logue 3 times (Weeks 2, 3, and 5) this season, did not sign him, and he remains on the Practice Squad. I think you're confusing needing to sign a player from the PS to play him after 3 elevations if they want to play him again (before the Post Season) with needing to do it for 3.
  9. That's incorrect. That used to be the case. But it was changed to 4 during COVID and then down to 3 in, I believe, 2024.
  10. I tend to agree with you. I knew we'd be bringing a veteran on with Hoecht and Jackson lost for the year. I was kind of hoping they'd look at him, but opted for Morgan Fox instead. Also true. Although Coleman may be someone they don't want to go back to though, depending on what's going on behind closed doors.
  11. Yeah, I got the two mixed up. I already updated the post, thank you.
  12. With Mecole Hardman moving to IR, Gabe Davis will likely move to the 53. Which will have us with 7 WR's on the 53 (one of which they may not want to go back to in Coleman) but only 1 on the Practice Squad (Gosnell), when we've carried 3 for most of the season, and we'll have an open (veteran) Practice Squad spot. They will likely add another WR to the Practice Squad when Gabe is signed to the 53. Could just make way for Kendall Wilkerson to return. But it could also be the kind of pathway I talked about for OBJ or another veteran WR.
  13. An interesting wrinkle to the (most likely) elevation of Davis, following the elevation of Hardman, is it leaves us with the 6 WR's we have on the roster plus only 1 WR on the Practice Squad (when we've carried 2-3 there all season) and an open veteran spot on the PS. Could just be the return of Kristian Wilkerson. But it could also be something more.
  14. Gabe Davis' path to the roster has been opened up following this week.
×
×
  • Create New...