Kevbeau

Have you gone camping lately. Or tried to cut down a few trees on your property...or build an addition without paying the environmental impact blackmail(your mileage may vary depending on where you live)

Actually that is the point. Regulators have yet to show any sort of restraint when it comes to any sort of legislation when it comes to personal freedoms (see: California.) as a result the gun lobby has decided to not give on anything, wary that an inch provides a crack in the armor for future momentum on restrictions. This creates an environment devoid of logic or rational solutions.

If this was truly about saving lives, they’d be marching for mandatory defensive driving courses. Also the quality of signage flies in the face of an “organic” march.

Few implies this has happened more than twice. Perhaps your friend needs to reevaluate his life choices.

I already had prepare a contingency downhill for taking price in the market due to increased cogs pressure that wasn’t apparent 6 months ago...and that was before this week happened.

“Nice beaver”

I have an arab (horse you degenerates) that serves the same purpose. No flight response in him when it comes to dogs. I've had a handful of instances with friends of friends bring their dogs to get togethers....because we have land & their dog "loves the open space." Funny, they never think to ask me if they can bring their dog.

That's just good policy.

And a complete disregard for crosswalks by the look of things.

Free Pontiac Sunfires for all?

Their GM is from West Seneca...so I assume the team should have an inkling of what's coming. The fans.....ehhhhhhh

So for grins I re-ran my 2016 return using the new rules. Federal bill ends up being about 8% less and I think it'll play similar for most people. Playing with a couple different scenarios, I was thinking about the impending blue state deduction apocalypse. If you're making a certain amount of income, chances are your triggering the AMT anyway, so property and state taxes really don't matter from a deduction standpoint. There are probably a lot of households in big metros that fall into this category and for them, they should see a decrease in their tax bill. That means the folks that are really going to take it in the pants are those who have overextended themselves from a real estate perspective (I don't mean this as a disparaging comment. I realize in certain parts of the country, the only way to own a home is to overextend.) They haven't had enough income to to trigger the AMT so have been realizing the full state/property deductions and because of state/local rates they're going to hit that 10K ceiling fairly quickly. Disclaimer: I am in no way a tax expert, so could be off base and I only looked at Married/Jointly.

I was thinking the same thing but wasn't positive....always thought it was a weight issue with youngs road running under the runway? Maybe a chartered 747 is light enough?

Everything I'm seeing is already $250ish minimum already

I'd heard DL was retiring all their 747s. Least everyone had plenty of legroom

Wow...they charter a 7-4? sorry,first thing I noticed. Go Bills!

I'm the same. Bunch I don't wear, but hang onto them because of memories. Of the top of my head, the oldest one I have that i still wear is a 1991 Lollapollooza Concert shirt (Toronto-Exhibition Stadium I think). Believe that was the first one, Jane's Addiction was the headliner.

I'm in....when do we start?

That would depend on your point of view & how you set the "it works" bar. (Yes I realize you can say this about any process)

Tables are so 2017....This is a step in the right direction for teef's cannonball vision.

It's like the tailgate version of the X games.

Knew a Dutch fellow named Flaud. Know what logically works? Socialism....until you introduce the human variable.

Wait....where's his other hand? I'm back b!@#$%!