Nineforty

I can see you have not read the Mueller Report and and are part of a cult. "Trump/Russia" is very real and it's disheartening you really believe it isn't. I bet you believe there was no collusion when the report is littered with it. And I know the difference between charging someone or a group with Criminal Conspiracy and proving it in a court of law, versus evidence of clear cut collusion. I will not waste any more time on you. Good day.

Of course, if you want to get bogged down in semantics. Which is why there is a trial where you can weigh certain statements or evidence and seek to determine one's guilt or innocence. Excuse me for thinking it was an important part of his conviction when you have someone on your own team reluctantly admitting you're a god damned traitor. I guess I didn't realize that counts for nothing because he couched his RELUCTANT statement in words like "generally believed" and "at that time". Guess the jury was supposed to ignore this. Gotcha.

"Bannon says Stone was Trump campaign link to WikiLeaks" BANNON TESTIFIED TO THIS! Reluctantly, but nonetheless, he did. From the trial transcript: Q. Now, I want you to turn to page 14, line 4. I’m going to read line 4 through 8 on page 14. And you’re asked, “And just within the campaign, who was the access point to WikiLeaks?” And you responded, “I think it was generally believed that the access point or potential access point to WikiLeaks and to Julian Assange would be Roger Stone.” Did I read that correctly? A. That’s correct. Q. And did you, at that time, did you personally believe or you personally view Roger Stone as the access point between Trump campaign and WikiLeaks? A. Yes. https://apnews.com/f0356496978045e1891f6543e7218c45 https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/12/roger-stone-trial-donald-trump-wikileaks-070368

1. McCabe wasn't even indicted. Stone was indicted and found guilty. Would you like me to go into detail for what? I'd be glad to. "Following a weeklong trial last November, a Washington jury found Stone guilty on all seven felony counts he faced: five of making false statements to Congress, one of obstruction of Congress, and one of witness tampering with both the House Intelligence Committee inquiry and special counsel Robert Mueller's probe." (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/10/prosecutors-prison-roger-stone-113542) 2. It's ironic/interesting to me that the "crime" McCabe was accused of was lying to cover up being involved in a story that hurt HILLARY, not TRUMP. 3. Stone's sentencing recommendation was for 7-9 years. This was recommended by a different entity, not the prosecutors. The prosecutors agreed. Judge Jackson has final say and can go above or below those guidelines. In my opinion (I've actually read the Mueller Report and know what Stone stands charged with and is likely hiding, and thus why Trump at all costs needs Stone to not see Jail time), Roger Stone is a traitor to America for his role with Wikileaks and the Trump 2016 campaign. I could go on and on and on with facts destroying this kind of nonsense...but is it worth it?

24-22 bills. Guaranteed.

thanks!

Sorry for the randomness of this, but I just saw this quote earlier (casual fan. stateside. don't have a team I follow, I just know from a friend this guy is.... interesting)... "I think the yellow card is fair because I was rude, but I was rude to an idiot." Coach Mourinho Who is the NFL coaching equivalent?

Wow dallas getting the ball out of half

When rex/bills played the ravens I called into jim rome radio show to give him a poor bills themed parody of 'the raven'... knowing he disliked poetry, it was cut off 15 seconds in, (?"I DONT LIKE THAT CALL"?) " Edgar Allan ran... I asked for a call not a poem."

https://mobile.twitter.com/BarstoolBigCat/status/1191489002999816192

I have him in my IR spot in fantasy. But that's not enough to want the Bills to make a foolish trade. He will be back with SD, playing by week 10 at the latest. That's my educated guess.

I don't think he is a chemistry killer. Could be. But you sure as hell don't know. I don't see the fit here, but it's from a cost stand point for a player you won't have beyond 2020. Also, he wants to shadow best receiver and play mainly man to man. We don't do that. I'm not saying we wouldn't be better with him. We would be. But our entire defensive scheme would change. And it's reported that he is well liked by his teammates on defense...I think it was Ryan Clark who said this recently. He is there best player in my opinion. I like the Brinks truck move too. It is fun and harmless and assists him in his leverage, even in an indirect, incalculable way.

Remember not too long ago when Dalton carved us up and had the ball out of his hand super quickly every freaking play? Me neither. It's 2019. We're onto 2019 Cincy

No OBJ, Chubb, or Landry. Not that that has to change anything for anyone...

Check it again. For me, just the pre game was blacked out... Thankfully the fiancee got the rabbit ears working. No shame.

Now this is a football guy. Kudos!

I am a bills fan and Kenny Stills became my favorite athlete in any sport with his criticism. ***** the Dolphins owner. ***** Trump.

so much anger.

I appreciate everyone's feedback/information. I have directV, but think I am going to do what I did last year. Purchase the blue sling package ($40/month). Gives me the Redzone channel essentially and some other channels I normally wouldn't have and used (I rarely used anything but the Redzone channel even when I had Sunday Ticket). It's month-to-month and was easy enough signing up and cancelling, last year at least. If it wasn't for the MSG/sabres, all the cords would be cut.

I'm getting married the 28th and really want to go to the game the next day. I'm told there are a lot of things to do the next day (there are, sigh).

Now I really don't want to defend the play buttttttttt if this was a big play in a big game, efing trip that mofo...

It may not be popular but I do not fault the man for tearing it down. No guarantee you succeed, but I am getting my guys. Is it about ego to some degree? Sure. But so what.