Nineforty

I thought his finger or a couple of fingers were stuck in the face mask when watching the replay on game day.

44-38 bills

i read this yesterday.. I'm going to assume this is where they got it from: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/29939438/2020-nfl-analytics-survey-which-teams-most-least-analytically-inclined

I like Ramsey. But here's to hoping we embarrass him and the Rams

do I start Robert Woods in fantasy? Would Tre shadow one of their WR's? I doubt it right?

I understood why we didn't resign him or why he didn't want to. Timing was off

I'm in the love camp and many noticed his talent. Always thought he was a gamer without a qb/offense. Not saying he is a true number one wr either. 1b or a 2.

why can't one be comfortable with the decision they made at the time they made the decision, and for the reasons they made it, at that given time? If I fold Q-J when A-K-2 is on the board, and a 10 comes on the river, I'm not mad that I folded.

I irrationally dislike #2 on your list. It's definitely a "me" problem I've noticed when talking to friends/fans.

As long as it wasn't mononucleosis

Enjoy and like the post. But I will choose as a fan to view this team as having no losing streak. New season. And you can hold me to that next year when things are reversed and we're riding a 19 game winning streak heading into 2021 season

Just wanted to thank those who paved the way and provided helpful info. Quick, pleasant call. ST Max free for season. A first in maybe 5 attempts over the years I believe.

We don't miss you. Any of you. And we can choose to beat your ass for riskin other people's health

2017- had Directv's Sunday Ticket 2018-2019- used Sling for redzone channel and Canceled directv because I know they auto renew 2019-Sling (sunday ticket didn't auto-renew. good) 2020-notices Sunday Ticket was auto-renewed! grrrrrrrrrrr click the 'X' button to cancel and get a message stating "Must call to deactivate".. double grrr

I find it more likely it is intentional. but maybe not. I just operate under the assumption they'll go with whatever makes more money.

had to find my login information just to chime in that this soflabillsfan1 is a tool. that is all. carry on.

You do understand the fact that Credico didn't want Stone jailed is irrelevant? You do understand what a reluctant witness is? You do understand that in that same letter (and the next paragraph of the article you copy/pasted), Credico writes, "I understand that Roger Stone has broken federal laws..." and then argues prison sentence would not be fair. You do understand nuances, such as the fact that Credico said he didn't believe Stone's threats, but also admitted that his threats to him and the judge could lead his acolytes (Proud Boys, crazy people on the internet, etc.) to do something harmful or violent. You do understand that the Judge said yesterday that Credico's grand jury testimony gave a different picture of his reaction to Stone's threats than when on the stand in the trial. Credico testified in to the grand jury that he no longer lived at his house after receiving Stone's threats and he also wore a disguise out of fear of being attacked by an ally of Stone? The judge also said she'd take Credico's more recent statements into consideration. Which is what she should do. And presumably did.

Volume I of Mueller Report stuff: Evidence of collusion (which is not a crime, I know) 1. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates (2016 Trump campaign manager/officials) were giving polling info to a Russian national that Gates thought was a "Spy" 2. Trump called on Russia to find Clinton's emails and ordered Flynn to find em. 3. Papadopoulos tried arranging meetings between Trump and Putin and Trump approved this work. 4. Don Jr created a meeting with the sole reason of obtaining Russian dirt on Clinton and Papadopoulos was offered similar stuff from a Russian agent. 5. Manafort meets with Konstantin Kilimnik repeatedly (connected to GRU). Kiliminik wanted to bring in person, a peace plan for Ukraine that even Manafort admitted to Mueller's team that it was a backdoor way for Russia to get Crimea. There is so so so much more but I realized it's not worth going through 20 more bullet points.

Mueller took it as a mandate. And maybe we'll find out Barr forced this view on him. I doubt it. I bet Mueller believes in the import of the memo's philosophy. It's somewhat comical to me that we are on the opposite sides of this, and you're saying IT'S NOT A MANDATE, when leading up to Mueller's issuance of the report, I was hoping beyond hope that that is what he would believe. You just think it's part of some conspiracy that Robert Mueller is a part of to fool "low information" people like me. Gotcha.

Yes? It's a quality site. You should try it sometime. It actually has conservative and liberal voices. To understand, it would require you to make some effort in understanding the OLC memo and it's history and relevance to this. I believe a traitor such as Trump It's not that hard to find a Foxnews.com article with Robert Mueller's quote that I was using from Vox.

Let me be blunt. I want Trump to hang. But I also understand the argument that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Ever. And I would welcome that debate after Trump.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/mueller-bound-olcs-memos-presidential-immunity I know a lot about this memo and it's impact. But don't take my word for it, take it straight from congressional testimony of Mueller, "We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted,” he said.

I don't disagree with the bolded. Of course. Did you click on the ***** links? lol I can tell you didn't. The first one is no an opinion piece as you put it. Sure it has the word "opinion" in the link title lol... ROBERT MUELLER'S OWN WORDS: We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted,” he said. The OLC policy itself is relatively straightforward: Most recently reevaluated in 2000, it argues that the executive branch would be incapacitated by a criminal prosecution: The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions. In his report, Mueller did not ultimately charge the president. He made clear during his afternoon testimony that because of the OLC opinion, his team did not even reach a conclusion about “whether the president committed a crime.” This point was a major clarification of an earlier exchange in which Mueller seemed to signal that he would have potentially charged the president, were it not for the OLC opinion.

Simple answer: 1. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president’s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution (there is a pdf if you'd like to read the OLC Memo) 2. Here is an explainer: https://www.vox.com/2019/7/24/20708393/robert-mueller-report-trump-olc-justice-department-indictment-charge-sitting-president 3. Trump was impeached. Forever impeached. He was acquitted by the Senate.

You didn't read it. It's really okay because I don't know many on either side of the issue that have. I read it and listened to it twice actually. If anyone reads Part I and comes away with the conclusion that the Russia/Trump collusion narrative was false, misleading, or part of a coup/deep-state/election reversal, or "nonsense" as you put it, then you are as bad as Trump, Stone, Flynn, Manafort. You are not a patriot. You are ignorant of the truth. Of what is right. And I view on the same level as these traitors. Except, you're not an actual traitor like them. You live in an echo chamber filled with QAnon twitter, Fox News TV, Breitbart news and it's all bull#### just recycled and regurgitated. You will live with your shame for a long time. It's just a matter of time before you realize it. And Part II proves obstruction of justice. Also, you do realize that the Mueller report turned a profit after Manafort's seizures? Of course, I highly doubt that money goes into funding the investigation, but I find it newsworthy nonetheless when people like yourself play the "this investigation cost taxpayers _____ argument". Even if they didn't make more off the seizures, this is a dumb comment filled with many.