TtownBillsFan

It was said in jest. Do you really not get that? (I'm thinking you do). He was saying something along the lines of 'Hillary is so haphazzard with her email security, and can't find the 60K+ emails she 'lost', and the 'Russians' were hacking her server....maybe the 'Russians' can help her find them? I'm pretty sure we all get the context of what he said. I'm not sure what the point is, but if Trump ran on a 'lark', and beat out the white-woman-annointed-one, what does that say about that flawed candidate? She had the red-carpet rolled out for her by the MSM, and STILL lost in the generals. Heck, if not for the fixing of the primaries in your party, she would have likely lost there as well. Such a flawed candidate she was.

Now that's just not fair. Yeah, I'm sure some trolls made their way over, but I'd not have found this site at all, the Bills news and PPP and all. I'm sure ya'll had trolls before the shutdown I'm glad I found this place!

She's one of the few journalists left that knows what the word means. Follow the story, wherever it takes you. But if you're a lefty, you decide what you want the story to be, then follow those 'facts' so that it takes you in the direction you want it to take you. Journalism is on life support. And it's people like Carter that keeps it somewhat alive. Honest question for you, and I ask you to answer honestly: What would you do if everything that DR has been laying out ends up being correct, and it's proven, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the Clintons are and were proven to be way way corrupt. IF that were to be proven, what would you do? Would you then denounce them, as I would if it's proven that Trump 'conspired' with the Russians to steal the election from her?

I'm giving you my attention for one moment, just one moment, to give me your, I was going to say fix or solution, but I won't even do that, as there isn't one. I'm giving you my attention for a moment for you to tell me how you would make the situation better. I'm listening. Go. I don't think there'll be a suggestion, as we'd have already done it if there was an 'easy' fix. There's not. There's the thing lefties jump to always and quickly, which is get rid of x/y/z gun. It won't change a damn thing, but that's the jump-to spot. And for people like me, who are defenders of the constitution, that's a proposal I cannot agree with. It's those very guns that defend his ability to make his "LA Grant" posts on this board. But I bet LA won't agree with that position. Just give me your best, non-gun-grabbing proposal on how to fix things. I bet we can agree on some things that might help, but gun-grabbing isn't going to work.

None of that is incorrect. BUT, they're not going to pony-up for what he'll likely cost on the open market. Not, at least, until we have the QB situation ironed out. At that point, maybe then we'll pay big for a FA WR. But I don't think it happens this year.

And there's about a .01% chance we'd be the ones overpaying. Why wouldn't anyone think we'd bring him back, when we just got rid of him, when we didn't have to. We got rid of him because the team wanted to. I'd say 0.0 chance, but I don't want to say never. But is about as close to a never-chance as you'll get. AAAAAND, I wouldn't want him, for what it'll likely cost. Let some other team burn cap space. A good QB can make even mediocre WR's look good.

Love it. Whatever it takes for Baker, and your price is CHEAP! Baker is the biggest competitor in this year's draft, at any position. He's a winner. We can never have enough of those! But, I'm an Okie, and a die-hard Sooners fan, so I'm biased, of course Bad, BAD idea this year. That's what we did last year for THIS year. Now is our time to strike. That being said, I'd really like to know where your profile pic comes from. That is quality!

This. Are you kidding? There are people on our team that would probably route for his injury before success, even on our team. Bad, bad idea.

Dude, you're now just showing yourself to be a jackass. Not all are good, but most are. They do a job that most don't want to, and couldn't do on their best day. Wow, man, I tried to give you benefit of doubt, but that was just a jackhole statement. I'm going to step away from keyboard before I get banned for saying stuff I shouldn't. But, man, you're unworthy. WOW.

I think the game ebbs and flows, but big receivers that can catch, and accurate QBs that can get them the ball will never change. I want us to get an accurate QB that isn't afraid to toss the ball up to our WRs, and I want a compliment of NFL-worthy receivers. A tall WR, a strong-man slot, and an X that's a combo of the two. Then sprinkle in a bruiser TE for blocking, and a scat-TE, like Charles Clay. We've got some of the pieces in place. I just hope we fill it all in

I'd take Bradford too, if we can get him on a reasonable contract. He's bound to have an injury-free year at some point. Then again, as I said in the Baker thread, I'm a Sooners homer, so yeah, I'd be happy with either

I hope his lack of stature drops him to a point where we can get him without trading away our draft for him. But if we have to drop our two firsts and a bit more, I really really think he's worth it. We'll rue the draft day we don't make a move for him; I really believe that.

Ditto. I want Baker badly, but I'm a Sooners fan, so probably alot of homerism on my part. But I saw every game Baker played for OU, ever snap, and there's not a bigger competitor, at any position, on any team, in college football. AND, Baker is crazy accurate, and crazy-good in making something out of nothing!

Honest question, and I'm going to ask and then have to run, my apologies, I'll be back to respond. Question: Do violent video games play any part in the school shootings? I really don't know the answer now-adays (kitschy language intended). I know it didn't matter to me personally, and I don't think games had any negative influence on my generation, short of 20 extra pounds from inactivity. But I grew up with Mario and Samus and Zelda. I still play now, but as an 'adult'. So, do the ultra-realistic, violent video games of today share any blame in teen/young-adult violence? I don't think so, but what say ya'll?

Would you really be surprised, after having read through this thread? Hmm?

I was late to this board, this page, and this thread, but I've read through all 119 pages of it. It's grand entertainment if nothing else. But I swear, if there is any justice in this world, I hope you're right, and I hope it ends up going all the way up the chain to Shillary herself. Any but the most partisan hacks know now that she's dirty as can be. I just wonder if the dirty footprints will work their way up to obamer. I guess we'll see! All high-drama and entertainment! Methinks it won't turn out the way lefties want, but we'll soon see!

Yes, presidents, and any elected official, get to have more leeway after they are elected. And I give you kudos for actually stating what may have happened in the Obamer situation there. Like you're not going to believe any insidious actions could have been taking place with Obamer, I'm going to likely believe that any action Trump was taking while acting as CiC were for the good of the country, although I don't know the context of the interaction you were asking about.

NEEEEEE! My Ugh was disappointment. They said you were just a troll that couldn't engage in rational debate. I've seen the way you interact with most, and I see how you're probably on 'ignore' from most. The ugh was me being disappointed that I might not get to debate with you. As to the conversation, I'd have to scroll back up to see what it was about again.

Ugh, for real? That's disappointing. I really don't want to talk in an echo chamber, and I hoped he was a thinking lefty.

Against DC's advice, I'm going to engage you for this one. How can you possibly say, "and"? If that was Trump, you'd be apopletic! That should drive any American crazy with outrage. Unless you like what he proposes, that he can be more lenient with the Ruskies after he secured his second term. Just swap the faces, and imagine how you'd react if that were Trump doing and saying the exact same thing that Obamer was caught saying. Here's your chance to show that you're not just a left-wing hack. I'm listening.

I must not have been around here long enough to get Cuga's predilections. I must be missing the joke.

Are you surprised? I'm not. That's the sad state of journalism today. And I'm sure this goes both ways, I'm sure Fox News was calling people too. The difference is, the Fox people aren't trying to take your rights away.

The 2nd does protect their right to apply for a rifle, that part your'e correct about. And I've not met a gun that did anything bad on its own. You really make the point yourself: people do things. Bad people do bad things. The tools they use are not at fault. I think you see that from what you posted, but yet you still end up blaming the weapon used. The easy joke is about a 'tool' being used. The tool used seems, to me, to be secondary to the problem at hand. This is clear evidence that you don't care to discuss the matter rationally. Guns = bad in your world, I get it. End of discussion.

I almost poo'd laughing, but that wasn't nice. Cuga didn't do anything to provoke that toward him/her/it. It would have been funny directed at anyone though.

I don't doubt you. It's just odd, because sometimes he posts something that seems like a semi-rational thought. Maybe it's unintentional. Maybe he quotes something from somewhere else that he doesn't give post-credit for. I know your cranky-old arse has been here forever, and if you say he's a lost cause, so be it I'm a crotchety old fart myself. I just hoped new blood might bring out something in some of the lefty-turds that they hadn't shown yet.