TtownBillsFan

Oh wait, would that be a % of the .03% that's evidently denied? Man, where do these people come from. And I read some of them, and they're generally non-stupid on the Bills side of the board I might not agree, but not stupid people. But then, this?

Doc, are you a current or former Democrat just figuring out that you're a relatively smart guy, and have been on the wrong side of things for a long time? That's what I gather from your posts. Ugh, Happy, you're on the wrong side of this one. I generally fall on the side of most things you're preachin about, but you're so wrong on this issue, it hurts. Get your head right son! Oh my, this guy makes himself a quick and easy ignore. I mean, really, ask for someone to comment, and then say you're not going to read said comment. IGNORE! No, please, let the lefty's that are about to go down show themselves. Especially those in what is supposed to be a non-partisan media (yeah, Dan Rather, non-partisan, I threw up a bit in my mouth typing that).

And, correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't this sillyness rejected at least once, until they got some illegal, immoral information that they then used? I'm pretty sure this whole thing probably makes up a good .01% of the rejected cases. Most of the time, I'd bet most of the intel community are good people, doing good things. It's only when it's used for witch hunts and political purposes that they go stupid. And that's probably why they have a .03% rejection rate.

Per normal, a guy from Oklahoma (like me!) with his head screwed on straight, and keeping the rule of law in mind for all things. Jim Lankford is a good one.

I agree, but I'd suggest China isn't so much an enemy, just someone we need to bring around to our way of seeing things. We each have the other by the short and curlys. Co-dependence. Barking up the wrong tree there, buddy I'm not that good, to be able to think that far left. If he's a caricature, and not for real, he's way better than I could ever dream of putting myself in that mindset. But I think I'm going to take that one as a compliment!

I have them both blocked, due to the inanity of both of their posts. I blocked 33 b/c I evidently just don't get him. I hear he's Canadian, maybe that's why I read most of his posts as just WTF. Tib, well, we know why he's blocked. I tried, I really didn't want to block Tib. But if I'm blocking craziness, I couldn't leave him out.

Does he support amnesty, or just granting a 'legal' status? I'm honestly asking, as I don't know that I've heard a definitive answer. I'm cool with a permanent legal status, so long as it doesn't come with a right to vote, nor any 'chain-migration' BS. And it MUST be accompanied by upgraded enforcement of the border; be that physical wall, technological wall, and/or all of the above. As to the rest, just say no to 'paid family leave' as any kind of government-declared right. That's between worker and employer. I'm okay with infrastructure spending, so long as things are truly 'shovel ready' Half-joking, no graft or waste, please. Let's just get the interstate highway systems back up to snuff. Let's reduce the debt by reducing spending across the board, straight 10% cut from last year works for me. And then continue a 1% or better cut per year until we balance. Let's get a budget in place, passed by Congress, that does the above, for the first time in too many years, please. Russia is not top geo-political threat. Countries with Sharia in place as ruling dictate are. Entitlement-reform, see above about reduced spending across the board. Thanks!

LOL, at least the guy answering the ludicrous question didn't answer yes. "strange times" though, as you hear in the clip. Strange times indeed. Wow, watching the rest of it, PMSNBC is so far off the rails, I'm wondering if they ever had any to begin with. I remember when CNN came online, but don't really recall when MSNBC came into being. Were they ever a news source, and not just a left-wing hackery?

I really really hope you are right about us not ever knowing their names. I just hope the service provided is properly acknowledged by their peers, as we cannot properly thank them for the service they provided. I doubt we pleebs ever know the true extent of what's going on/has gone on, but I want to give my thanks for the service to the Country they have provided, those unnamed. Truly, thank you.

I think they're doing that because they don't even want to touch the substance (or lack there-)of his message. Even the left knows it was utter crap. Better to attack the messenger, as usual. And on such trivial things. Is it just coincidence that the movie Idiocracy is playing on Starz right now? Probably not, but good call on their part!

My lips get really chapped this time of year too, so I felt sorry for him looking like he had drool coming out. Not a good look, for certain. That aside, I wanted to smack some sense into him several times while he was speaking, so drool away. If that's the left's response, yay!

So, the Clinton email scandal may still be in play? She may still wear orange as a result of all of this? We all know, the left included, that she SHOULD be in trouble. It's without question she broke the law: for-eyes-only and other similarly classified info was clearly mis-handled. Are they finally going to get a Clinton for breaking the law? They have broken so many, but are they actually going to have to face the crime now, and not be let off the hook yet again?!

Omg you're making my stomach hurt from laughing.....is that a Gary Busey face? OMG! I get that Busey is a raving lunatic, but I've always kinda liked him. Maybe it's because he's an Okie. I think he's from Tulsa. Is this really a thing? I just don't get people anymore. The emasculation of man by CNN and the left knows no bounds.

None of it is that hard to understand to non-partisan hacks. And I'm sure the coal miners are happy to have the jobs coming back to their industry after Obamer tried to kill it. I mean, I remember when I heard Obamer say that energy prices would necessarily have to increase as a result of his policies. I literally did a double-take, and had to rewind what I heard to make sure I heard him correctly. I honestly thought he mis-spoke at first. But it was one of the few times I think I heard him tell the truth. He MEANT to make energy cost more for all of us, as punishment for this evil country having an abundance of energy resources, and the ability and technological know-how to get at them. It just took me by surprise that he was that honest in his early years.

Actually dude, NOW you make sense, when you actually explain the random thoughts going on in your head. And I'll take the info you now coherently communicated as fact. I'm not really surprised about a complete swapping of colors; it's what they do. I don't know that I have any cultural bearings....I don't know what that even means. But I'd like to think I can follow 'basic things of politics'. And yeah, I'll just ignore that last part of the crap you said there about the band, the president, the fictional character, etc.

Actually, I live down here in Oklahoma, just to the north of Texas if you're checking your map, so I'm bombarded with the news of this area of the world. My comment was more about I couldn't make heads or tails of what you were trying to say. When I can translate what you're saying, I more often than not agree with your opinion. You just make it difficult to translate quite often.

You're worried about this supposed 1.5 trill added to the debt from a tax cut allowing we who pay taxes to keep a couple extra bucks, but where do you stand on the 8+tril that Obamer gave us? Or the 8+ that occurred through history to that point?

This is another of those wtf are you talking abouts that I keep asking myself, are you on meds, or do you need to be?

Sometimes I want to 'thumbs up' what you're saying. More oftentimes I'm left scratching my head, wondering wtf you're rambling about. This is one of those wtf's. Are you on meds, should you be if not, or do they need tweaked if you are? Exactly.

If what I think is going to come out, and people can't accept it and adjust their vote accordingly, I don't know that we can be saved. I mean, if it's as bad as I suspect, and the proof is there, and people still ignore it and vote for the Schumers and Pelos(s) of the world, wtf does that say about our country? Probably what I already believe: to many can vote. Yeah, that's a controversial stance to take. But good grief, if you're too damn dumb to see facts and process them, and still vote for those guys, we're screwed regardless. The damage has been done.

I've been a TT supporter, b/c he's been the best QB we've had since at least Flutie. And, as Flutie was, I love rooting for the underdog. I'm a humongous Sooners fan, and I'm hoping we end up with Baker. If we choose not to move around in the draft, and Mayfield is not there for us at our first pick, I hope we get Rudolph.

From extensive study, my findings are, to differing degrees, that is correct. Those arguing otherwise have a political agenda Shame on them for now internally color-shaming! We can't even wear a pink kitty-hat without triggering someone!

Perhaps my definition of liberal and your definition of conservative differ. They must. As you're defining me. I define myself as conservative. I don't give a flying turd what you do, so long as you don't infringe upon my rights, and I won't infringe upon yours. Now, that doesn't mean you can break the laws as they are on the books. If you don't like the laws, elect people to change them. I hope most people are like that. You do you, I do me, and we all get along. That's conservatism to me. I know that is classic liberal, but the term has been so bastardized that I speaking in today's terms. So I'm today's conservative, as I know it to be. We need to define language, so we know where we're coming from. I bet most of us are more similar than dis-similar in that. ROFL, not nice :P, but too damn funny!

It's not because of those of us that vote the people in our out. I vote for people that DO speak to having a right-bent. If they then go to congress and don't do what they ran on, I vote them out. I wish they'd do what we sent then for, what they run on. But I'm sure you're right, they get there, and then go along to get along. That's why we need term limits like no one's business! Get in, get out, do what you're voted in to do.

There is no way any satirist can improve upon the sheer absurdity of real life, especially when writing about far left SJWs in a red queen’s race to out-woke themselves. https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/285677/ 138 LOL, so do they hate themselves when they won't support??? Who am I now supposed to support, the person that won't wear one b/c it's pink, or the one that won't wear one b/c someone could be offended (b/c it's not pink)??? (again, LOL!!!) I missed this post earlier, but LOL, but holy crap these people are insane! By the way, I support all kittys! Hat wearing or not!