Jump to content

RoyBatty is alive

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RoyBatty is alive

  1. What relevance is Acosta? I could easily debate the Acosta scenario, often getting a harsh conviction is difficult if not impossible and you have to plea bargain, fact of life but keep dumping on Acosta who paid the price bey quitting. You cant stop bringing him up and after all he is gone. Is that all you have to hang your hat.
  2. Kidding right? You seriously think that? If true then why is it Schiff that wants to hide him and lie that he doesnt know his name (sad yet laughable so absurd) , not that anyone that cares in the world doesnt already know his name.
  3. She was yeilded time from Nunes and Schiff denied her the time. Again Schiff just kind of makes up the rules as it fits his agenda, and then switch them back again when expedient.
  4. the first go round. He had to let her go the second This "witness" is all about emotion, very sorry for her, she was done wrong by the Evil sexist Trump. She isn't a witness to ANYTHING at all, was let go months before the alleged impeachable events took place.
  5. There is a very simple reason why Schiff wouldn't let Stefanik speak the first go round. Stefanik is a woman and they want to keep the appearance of this poor females Abassador that was unfairly fired and humiliated by the mean sexist Donald Trump. Schiff doesn't want a Republican woman to question her , it would diminish the allusion of her being a female victim of secxst male republicans led by the evil emperor Trump. Very shrewd on the part of Schiff, i guess Democratic real tme focus groups are working.
  6. Yeah because after all Clinton and the Clinton foundation there was no, i mean n corruption at all. The Clinton Foundation is one of the biggest money luandering scheme of all time.
  7. Pelosi is like most politicians, she really doesnt give a damn what is good for the country, being in power is all that matters and getting rid of Trump is her #1 priority. Lets take just one example, the Democrats are now the party of war and engagement, they wanted Trump to attack Turkey, they were outraged when he took troops out of Syria, they are outraged he is trying to make peace ion North Korea. There are trillions of dollars in the war economy and a lot of politicians have made a lot of money with military industrial complex? How long are we going to keep troops in South Korea? How long are we going to continue overpaying for NATO?
  8. I confess I did watch for about one minute that Amb Taylor, what an arrogant bombastic ass, he really does think he is superior and he sets that national agenda, people on both sides of the aisle should be scared of these bureaucratic unelected officials thinking they are in charge and the PRESIDENT has to answer to them
  9. I cant imagine wasting time watching all these sanctimonious blowhards
  10. Agreed 1000%, there aint NO way the NFL forked over millions just to leave themselves open to be sued again. Florio's entire "take" is asinine.
  11. This seems to be to bizarre, a second grievance? "file a second grievance alleging collusion and/or retaliation arising from his prior collusion grievance, which reportedly was settled for payment in the range of $1 million and $10 million." If the NFL is really stupid enough to settle the first grievance case for millions of $ without adequate agreement by Kap to eliminate any future liability, then they are dumb beyond comprehension. Oh not so fast, not so fast. The team that signs him will be lauded as heroes by most of the media and most of social media. Ironically a team like San Fran should sign him, you think they would lose a lot of fans for signing him, they might net gain fans and $.
  12. Yeah, Team Nike did...gotta keep Kaepernick "relevant"
  13. ok, i didnt see it i was just read what the OP wrote. So why not have goodwin go in motion sideways pre snap to get a good head of steam and then turn up field And goodwin is literally a world class speedster, not sure how many guys in the NFL could match him
  14. true but Goodwin running to the line will be the ultimate "tell" as to when the ball will be snapped
  15. I dont think it will catch on, two big problems with it. 1st, it has to be timed perfectly, if the timing is off by a second, easy to get offside and what if the receiving team moves blockers before the snap, there wont my any time to reset the blocking...... 2nd it will give the receiving team the go ahead when to start the rush
  16. this is pretty spot on accurate and yet the Browns were playing for their jobs and respect. And when Edmunds can shed he is in the wrong gap or headed in the worng direction.
  17. Actually Fitzpatrick would be a great backup/mentor for Allen.
  18. Stick with Allen and Barkley. I am increasingly nervous re Allen but he needs another year and Barkley is very serviceable.
  19. not a chance. And iagree with OP, the Pitt game will likely be the difference of the playoffs or not
  20. Edmunds was TERRIBLE on 90% of the plays, absolutely TERRIBLE. Most of the time a total non factor. Yes he had a safety, had a tipped pass and two assists on tackles. Pitiful. And I must have missed all the times he supposedly stopped Chubb? I guess I missed those.
  21. Good post. Edmunds showed up big? Going to disagree on that. Yeah he got a sack and safety and out side of that, otherwise, i think he had two assisted tackles. For an NFL MLB that is very, very hard to only get 1 tackle and rwo assists. Knox did have a great game. I think the woefully under utilized Singletary, 8 touches for over 5 yards a carry, against one of the worst run Ds in the league?
×
×
  • Create New...