Herc11

Didn't see if it was posted, but f Tyreek Hill and F the Dolphins! https://www.instagram.com/p/Cixz8zXOKi7/?igshid=NDRkN2NkYzU=

HOF has turned into Hall of players that were good.

They did have good O-lines. But IMO the reason Brady was so successful with those conversions wasn't necessary the line. Brady was always on top of that situation and they would get to the line immediately and quick snap while the defense was still scrambling to set up. He rarely allowed the defense enough time to get set correctly. He's only physical because he will lower his shoulder to try and run a defender over before trying to juke them. As I said before, this worked in college with smaller defenders. I can't recall a single run he has made in the NFL where he has run anyone over.

They should stop with this nonsense that Moss is a power back. He might of been in college where guys are smaller, but in the NFL he isn't big or powerful enough to be utilized that way.

Thank god

Until they get full body x-rays, Billdo's will always have a cavity to be hidden in

Go check, it will tell you if you are eliminated or not Bragging rights

Damn. ESPN still can't resist pointing out a negative while giving us the 1 spot.

I thought this was going to be a joke about the streaker lol

Someone needs to write an article ranking sports writers and state the stats on their predictions, hot takes, and accuracy.

His lawyer is a criminal defense lawyer. His goal is to keep Matt out of jail, not on the team. Correct. Like always, there are three sides to every story. In this case: Hers, His, and the truth.

You're speaking on her accusations like they have already been proven to be fact. Witnesses. Thats how you build a case, witnesses. His lawyer did get an investigator that has interviewed witnesses. He's already stated this. You don't lay out your entire defense outside of court.

Wasn't aired on the game that I know of. I just know it was released during the game. Also doesn't appear McDermott knew he was going to do it as he appeared upset about it during the post-game interview.

I do too, but the poster i was replying to was saying he needs to have a press conference and not stay silent.

He made a press release yesterday during the game saying he was going to clear his name.

The timeline of events may be very telling once they are out. From what it sounds like, Matt and her hooked up early at the party. Did they continue hanging out afterwards? Did they go there separate ways and were hanging out with others. Did Matt leave the party and she got heavily intoxicated and an hour or two later ended up in the bedroom? So many details left out so far. Matt's attorney sounds confident. Maybe he already has a timeline of events and more details from witnesses that he is saving for court.

Maybe you should read back to see where my responses originated to see the context.

Try proving that in court. Especially with the circumstances that Matt did have sex with her that night.

My response was purely about the other poster inferring that she is a slut if she lies about her age. Which is ridiculous. You and I, nor anyone else, but her and maybe her friends know about her intentions of going to a college party. She may have lied about her age because she wanted to fit in. Young girls like to look and be presumed they are older than they are..

Maybe its not even a money grab as Matt's lawyer suggests. Maybe they decided to include the name of the person that had the most celebrity status, knowing it would get tons of media attention. The other two named are nobodies and just naming them doesn't get headlines. Her lawyer may know they have nothing on Matt, in terms of gang rape, and truly only cares about getting this moving to get the other two.

So she can accuse someone of rape, but when witnesses accuse her of lying about her age, thats wrong?

So lying about your age means your a slut now? Talk about reaching

You can guarantee it? This is ignorant. Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean you can guarantee you were never, or never are, vulnerable to someone accusing you of something you didn't do.

This thread is 62 pages. I read 30, saw people reiterating the same thing over and over and this wasn't one. Apologies if I rehashed something I missed

From chamberslawfirmca.com: "In California, the police are allowed to tap your phone, but they have to follow procedures to do so legally. California is a two-party consent state, which means that both people involved in a conversation must consent to any recording. Privately, you cannot tape your phone calls with your friends, family, or anyone else without first getting their agreement. However, law enforcement has different rules. If the police do not take the required steps to tap your phone, any evidence they collect can be thrown out at trial." Ya, sure. I just woke up.