Herc11

Maybe you should read back to see where my responses originated to see the context.

Try proving that in court. Especially with the circumstances that Matt did have sex with her that night.

My response was purely about the other poster inferring that she is a slut if she lies about her age. Which is ridiculous. You and I, nor anyone else, but her and maybe her friends know about her intentions of going to a college party. She may have lied about her age because she wanted to fit in. Young girls like to look and be presumed they are older than they are..

Maybe its not even a money grab as Matt's lawyer suggests. Maybe they decided to include the name of the person that had the most celebrity status, knowing it would get tons of media attention. The other two named are nobodies and just naming them doesn't get headlines. Her lawyer may know they have nothing on Matt, in terms of gang rape, and truly only cares about getting this moving to get the other two.

So she can accuse someone of rape, but when witnesses accuse her of lying about her age, thats wrong?

So lying about your age means your a slut now? Talk about reaching

You can guarantee it? This is ignorant. Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean you can guarantee you were never, or never are, vulnerable to someone accusing you of something you didn't do.

This thread is 62 pages. I read 30, saw people reiterating the same thing over and over and this wasn't one. Apologies if I rehashed something I missed

From chamberslawfirmca.com: "In California, the police are allowed to tap your phone, but they have to follow procedures to do so legally. California is a two-party consent state, which means that both people involved in a conversation must consent to any recording. Privately, you cannot tape your phone calls with your friends, family, or anyone else without first getting their agreement. However, law enforcement has different rules. If the police do not take the required steps to tap your phone, any evidence they collect can be thrown out at trial." Ya, sure. I just woke up.

California is a two-party consent state. Meaning, you can not record a phone call without both parties consenting. I'm curious if the police had a warrant for taping the phone call. If not it could bite them in the ass.

NFL will announce an investigation which will then take the entire season without any kind of real updates. Then they will announce a fine leading into 2023 season.

If Dana White was the one orchestrating the whole thing, would it still qualify as tampering? After all, he isn't associated with the NFL in any capacity. Anyone know how the tampering rule is actually written?

Train horn is in mid-season form

We're playing their 2nd stringers. A clear trap game I fear.

I agree with what you stated as a factor in the Kaep situation. However, I firmly believe that if he was a top QB, he would of still been playing. Lets not forget, he had an offer on the table from SF that HE declined.

I realize this, but was it false? He was saying what we all already know. Haslam was just an idiot who outright admitted it.

If you haven't watched Rich Eiesen's clip, go watch it. No one is implying anything, Haslam literally said it himself. Watson got a second chance because he is a star QB. Which he followed up by saying someone that wasn't wouldn't get that same opportunity.

Haslam said it himself in the interview he just did. Watson got a second chance cause he is a star QB. Kaep's star had faded by the time he became a nuisance.

I know it would never happen, but wouldn't it be great if no one tuned in or showed up to Browns games as long as Haslam or Watson was there?

Just saw this on my FB feed. Looks like the stadium tour featuring Motley Crue, Def Leopard, Poison, and I think Joan Jett played at the Ralph the other night. Would of been a cool throwback concert. Maybe I'll catch them when they hit Cali.

Wtf are these idiots thinking?!?

CB

They're playing 4D chess to get Arch in about 3-4 yrs

Exactly! Anyone quoting the stats on his football cards and using that as an argument isn't looking at the entire picture at all. Speaking of being the fastest on the field, Bo's 40-yard at the combine even has legend around it. Some claim he ran 3.9, one scout actually said he timed him at 4.12 seconds. If piss poor medicine didn't ruin his career, he may have been the one to beat Walter Payton's career numbers. and YES, Bo was 10x the RB Emmitt Smith was. Emmitt had two things going for him, the O-line and longevity. He played for 15 years, which we all know is ultra-rare at RB. That was his specialty, not speed, not elusiveness, not power. Bo was a powerback with insane speed especially with his size. Put him in Dallas all those years as a feature back. That would of been wild.

In the grand scheme of playoff tie-breakers, you are correct. But, when it comes to the 1 seed, they all matter.