PrimeTime101

you say you want peoples opinions, obviously its just yours you want. I am not going to engage in this convo with you anymore.

Won't have that conversation because the chances are slim of them falling I would rather have a realistic conversation then discuss this... IF they did? ID trade with someone that needed a CB and pick up extra picks this is not madden football. it is not as easy like that. Who are you going to trade? White? not with that contract. Elam? Not on that rookie contract. Again, I would trade the pick if lightning struck like that and get draft pick(s)

I just want to say... I LOVE this topic.. It's like we are getting it all out of our system in a positive way. GG mate.

keep em swinging lol!

I will add another one.. YOU CANT TEACH ACCURACY! Uh Rah!

the values themselves are messed up... not just in general for each position but for the positions on teams themself. Doubling down + some on QB, when WR is a need in this league is crazy. and .03 for HB? mine as well say you do not need a HB at all.... thats my biggest issue with all of this.

says it in the title. he is trying to build an entire draft board based on our vote. the problem with that is, many do not know one name from the next. and yes... lol... I agree... CB is the least of our concerns.

no.. read back a couple posts. I did not see the math equations in small print. now go back and read my last reply to orange.

GOT YA! TY for explaining it. Way to much wait for QB compared to the other positional values. IS it a QB driven league? oh yea lol! BUT! to say the QB position is over 100% more important than the WR position? Last year with buffalo is proof how wrong that value is. TY SIR for explaining it. I guess bottom line, his values are bad. especially where he puts them with some teams. RB .. dime a dozen... but .03? christ.. lets drop cook and sign a crap HB if thats the true value of a HB on a team? .03? come on man. FYI i did not see these numerical numbers on top of the SS till I blew it up. Thanks again mate.

My personal opinion that i NEVER agreed with? Funny I just touched on this in another thread. "Because of JA elbow injury, It is easier for him to chuck it 60 yards down field, then a 7 yard pass"' I mean Bloody Hell.. Just the torque alone to throw a ball time after time deep on an injured elbow?

HA HA! glad we cleared that up! lol. someone with a head on their shoulders... I LIKE IT! lol! Cheers

Ok... after us "talking" I get it. you want to build a draft board... but their are tons of draft boards out there and many people on these forums do not know who half these names are, thus not giving a really good vote. I guess that was my point. And to the point of @GunnerBill , I am not sure any of us would be happy period with any CB in the first 3.

I agree. but wait.. someone will chime in and take 1 dr's words that JA could chuck the ball 60 yards down the field easier than a 3 yard pass...

thanks for getting this back on topic. Great post bro. 1000% agree with you

Do we need a CB? I am confused... why is this such a big topic for this team in early rounds?

Math. This is supposed to be done with a mathematical equation and until now you can't explain it. you have one offense with 3 of the 5 positions in the green and a little red and another team with 2 green and 3 red. It does not add up. period. There is no where in this formula that says a QB weighs more than another position group... If that were true then somewhere it would say that in the formula the QB position or say the WR position outweighs other positional groups. but it does not say that.

No. I am asking how the math works where Cinci and all their positional values ends in a total offensive grade of 1.8 and then the same with Dallas. Fact is they don't match.

there is all kinds of broken numbers on here

No I am going to stop you RIGHT THERE!!! LOL! I asked you to qualify the Bengals offense positional Value to the Cowboys position of value both being 1.8 offense. The fact is you cant qualify it.. period..

or maybe both?

I am an open minded person that is beginning to get it. . My biggest issue is the Offensive positional ranking between Dallas and Cincinati where Cinci has much poorer numbers on offense compared to Dallas, yet they both have 1.8 ranks. can you explain that to me and maybe I will grasp it better. That being said I still believe some of these ranks on these teams are still broken. Help the old man out will ya? LOL

even if you use Weighted Averages, the numbers still do not add up. they dont

if you read the original OP... yes its with Rodgers

Here is my problem. One side has a max of 4 points and the other side has the max of 2 points. There is not enough separation to properly grade the positional value and not even close enough numbers to separate Overall, Off and Def. Nothing adds up and some of these positional values are severely broken. Bolded. If true then this graph is as broken as it gets.

Clay is getting roasted in twitter over this colored toilet paper... uh... i meant graph