warrior9

I can't get to the 70-80 man. That's too much and taking his running element out of it. It's not 1970 anymore. I can get on board with 35-40%.

/thread. They have not played a physical team yet. If you get in to a track meet, you lose. Abuse their OL, stop the run, get to Tua, keep everything in front of you.

I have grown to really respect Dan O and his insightful takes. I was actually pleasantly surprised with how good he was on MNF last week too. I feel he is very rational, he uses film, and he will call even call "stars" out for mistakes not give them excuses.

I thought Beane couldn't draft, missed on FA's, and our offensive line problems were all his fault?

Oh of course dude, it's all in good fun.

people will literally read one sentence, assume, and then post like ... "Yepp! Got him!" I get it man, reading comprehension is very tough these days.

Dude, it doesn't give you a better chance of winning the SB... HISTORY AND STATISTICS SHOW it gives you a SIGNIFICANTLY worse chance... ATL has a good offensive line.... They also run the ball 30x a game and he has Allgeier to spell him.. You people and your big names are crazy.. Jame Cook averages more YPC than JT as well. Please show me ONE INSTANCE where an RB put a team over the top to win a SB... just one. You're arguing in circles but haven't proved a single point / shown how RBs value is minimal. There are 100's of examples to prove their lack of value. Raheem Mostert is 31 on his 7th team and just had a 100 yard game. Zack Moss just had a 100 yard game and a few TDs Kyren Williams is 5th and just won the job from a 2nd or 3rd round pick Pacheco won the job over a 1st round pick Chubb leaves, Ford does better Derek Henry was the best RB in the league for 3 years, won nothing Josh Jacobs was rushing title last year, no playoffs.... do we continue or are you going to still pound the table for someone because he has a big name and you think that wins football games?

I'm sure you thought Dalvin Cook was elite too. (90% of sports pundits said he was a top 5 RB in the league while he was an FA looking for a new home) Goes to a team with no offensive line.. and *gasp* guess what?! He is below average and is averaging 2.5 yards a carry. What's the excuse here? No QB? No Offensive line? obviously.. because these things MAKE an RB, not the other way around.. How many examples need to be shared and proven for people to understand this?

As someone that lived there for 24 years and has now lived in 3 other cities... all major and 1 other smaller town (Oklahoma City) My girlfriend is from Phoenix. I can confirm that all of this is true.

Dude, there is no way a human is that dense. Bills fans will LITERALLLLLLLY stare at stats and videos of something happening and STILL say "no that's not true." They can't get over their feelings about a person once they formulated them. He's been INCREDIBLY elusive so far this year and even in to the back half of last year. People were pounding the fking table for speed for YEARS with singletary... now we have it and they want power? It's absolutely asinine

I don't agree with that. Fields is just historicallllyyyyy bad dude. Pace has done a solid job with the team ... he knew that this coming draft was significantly better than the past so he didn't take a QB. He will fire Eberflus, have another solid draft and get his QB (i can't remember if he drafted Fields or not)

So Tillman calling Eberflus and him crying are also rumors? Damn.

Exactly... I reallllllly hope it's not CP related for all of humanity man...

Maybe they don't ... I'm unfamiliar but I mean, the dude isn't a murd----, so logically, what else can it be?

Did you read my post? You don't get raided for not feeling well.. sure he has to work on his health but there is WAYYYY more to it. Maybe it is narcotics and sales.

I don't think I've ever heard of the FBI raiding someone because they were not feeling well. Yeah it's health reasons because he probably has mental health issues dealing with minors, CP, DV, or SOMETHING.. The FBI doesnt just raid your house / place of employment

You're LITERALLY proving my point. RBs are easily rotated in and out. They were WORTH it because they were cheap. They didn't pay them (like you thought they did), they had VALUE when they were cheap.

This is patently false as well. I don't hold any kind of grudge for people wanting to get paid. They are worth what they are worth. Their worth is REPEATEDLY shown to be lower than every position in football. If you can find me one instance where paying an RB a lot of money worked out, I'll shut up. This has NOTHING to do with my feelings toward RBs but everything to do with their positional monetary value and the success of a team.

As is their QB. Once they pay him, CMC will be gone... and guess what will happen? They'll replace him continue to win games because Shannahan is a hell of a coach and they will have a great line. i mean dude, look at the Browns game. Ford comes in and has more yards than Chubb. It's not about the running back but the OLine.. Zack Moss just had a great game. Mostert is 31 on his 7th team and just had over 100.. The examples go on and on and on about why you dont pay running backs.. There are just a bunch of people that love big names and Madden in here that dont understand no matter what you put in front of their face.

That is all false. The "top of your head" is very very wrong bubbaccino. Someone already tried the Fournette thing. Brandon Jacobs salary 2012- 782,000 Brandon Jacobs salary 2008- 900 Corey Dillon salary 2004- 600,000 Bettis 2005- 4M but he wasn't the starter, Willie Parker was (per the team website and depth chart) Addai salary 2006- 275K There i ONE on there.. and it's marshawn lynch.. We're going to keep trying this huh? https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/history-shows-high-priced-running-backs-may-not-be-a-part-of-super-bowl-winning-formula/ Of course they dont.. having a great offensive line does. You dont win by tying your salary up to a position that is MAINLY BASED on the performance of 5 other guys.. You have such a weird hard on for RBs but history shows and will continue to show.... they dont win you super bowls and paying them will lead to a long long time of franchise purgatory.

So ... history lies? So the last 20 years of not paying RBs and winning is a lie? LOL ok bubbaccino We'll be rotting corpses by the time a team builds a dynasty around paying 17-18M to an RB. Oh wait, Titans tried that, Vikings tried that.... annnddddddd it failed.

Then why has no team who pays a starting RB over 2.5M won a superbowl in the last 20 years? Just a weird coincidence?

Yepp, didn't see it. Guess I looked for "Sergio Brown" and didn't see it That's what you took out of the article, huh?

So Sergio's mother is found dead 100 yards behind their home that they share, no one hears from Sergio for a few days, he pops up in Mexico and is blaming the FBI or police department for killing her. He appears to have a LOT of mental issues and him fleeing does not look good, nor does his (seemingly) lack of care in the video. "she's just on vacation" https://www.vibe.com/news/entertainment/nfl-star-sergio-brown-resurfaces-mother-dead-1234791756/

Well it's not one game. He was great at the end of last year and was very good in the Jets game. Again, you don't win in this league by paying RBs. it's the offensive line. If you win by paying RBs, why do none of the highest paid RBs have a SB ring? Not a single one. AP, LT, Derrick Henry, Le'Veon Bell, McCaffery, Zeke (when he was with Cowboys), Chubb, etc etc etc ....