Mountain Man

That's plausible. But equally there were no doubt a number of players in the same position.

That's fine. You can believe it. That's your right. Doesn't mean everyone has to.

You're right, it isn't impossible. But in terms of whether I think its likely? For a team in recent years that has had huge success with day 3 picks.

That's fine. People can claim it, and people have a right to believe it. Equally people have a right to be a bit cynical that the Bills were about jump up 30+ spots for a WR in a deep WR class where they had already used their 1st,and multiple day 3 picks on a WR.

That's sounds great, if you choose to believe it. The world is full of people claiming to know things.

That may be. But to trade up Duvernay is one that sounds a bit doubtful. You are trading up 30+ picks. That's a lot of draft capital

Because just because 2 players played for small schools in a similar position doesn't mean team value them the same

I can't see it. They would have to do a New Orleans and chuck in their remaining draft.

Can't see it. The Jags are aimg for Lawrence and it isn't subtle

It isn't an open market. There are barely any jobs. And as Winston showed, QBs will take pay cuts to get in the right situation. Dalton could easily take a Winston type 4m or so deal, and bank on doing well and getting paid next year

In the current situation, to even put on the draft is admirable. But it can't be immune from criticism. The ESPN NFL Network collaboration just didn't work. 6 analysts never would. I know they want to use their big money stars. But the coverage would have been improved significantly if they had cut 1 from each network. Likewise they over extended themselves with the cameras on prospects. The timings were all over the place. They should have less cameras and better use of them. They stretched themselves way too far With more and more competition from online coverage via platforms such as Youtube, the big networks need to up their game next year

The whole video editing of draft picks was a joke. You could see by looking at the TV screens in the background the timings were all over the place.

A massive cap jump is expected because of the new CBA which will make that gap a lot smaller

This is almost as bad an idea as 2021 mocks.

I gave up on the ESPN coverage by halfway through the 1st round. The Bleacher Report coverage with Miller, Lefkoe and Rodgers was far better with much more analysis, especially on days 2 and 3.

Who is Chad Reuter? You never see him on TV or doing podcasts. He just seems to do long mocks and draft articles for nfl.com.

Odd that Bleacher Report that negative, given on their online stream (which was far better than Espn / NFL Network) Matt Miller and Conor Rodgers liked every pick.

Nothing he said discounts another punter. Indeed he kept going on about competition the whole call. He talked about Vedvik's versatility and made no specific comment on his punting ability. He never made any suggestion about not getting more competition in. He never said it was Borjequez vs Vedvik.

There is at least 1 NFL running back who won't be pleased to see AJ.

Mike Glennon? As in Mike Glennon Mike Glennon?

I did. Where did he rule out any punter UDFAs?

Doesn't he? Enlighten us where your source is....

No he is the new Brandon Reilly.

No reason he wouldn't. Neither of the 2 are proven and its an open spot

We will be a very unattractive place for UDFAs to sign this year. Despite a history of giving them a chance, its clear we have a loaded roster and it's one the toughest places to stick on a roster in the league at the moment.