Royale with Cheese

I think you just like to agree with me because I'm a pretty cool guy.

They are showing the Bills at Pats from last year on NFLN.

I don't think it takes a lot of confidence. He's not a you or I...regular Joe's. He's a professional QB in NYC. Women throw themselves at him. We had a guy on my college team that was a virgin, not good looking and had no clue how to talk to women...never had a GF. We went out drinking one night and told woman in the bar that we were celebrating as a group because our good man Danny was just drafted by the Pirates and got a $7 million dollar signing bonus. He had girls all over him the entire night. They were like ants with dropped candy on the ground. I used to hangout in areas where Braves players used to frequent....these guys just sit down and girls come to them.

The only issue I see with this is if lets say the Bills play in Munich for the 17th game. They then have to play a 1st round playoff game the next week in LA. In one week they'll experience jet lag in time zones with a 9 hour difference

If you're a millionaire and professional football player early 20's QB in NYC, you should be able to bang hot milfs without too much effort.

Isiah McKenzie said he would play here for candy.

Could Brett Farve or John Elway do any of these?

He’s the brother of the singer who sings Addicted To Love.

Ray Liotta and James Caan about a month apart. Sucks.

A little old but just saw this.

They’re all liars. Settle was practicing his wohoo in the mirror to sell the lie to us fans…that SOB.

If they say they do, they're liars.

That's not what I said Senor Dramatic. I will 100% acknowledge Buffalo is towards the bottom of cities that most players would want to play in. But to say that "not one single player has/had a dream to play here" is something I don't agree with. Why even have this discussion anymore? You've made up your mind. I could quote a player, like Jones, who said they really wanted to be here and you can always use the "they aren't honest with the media" jibberish. I happen to believe that some are honest but that won't even cross your mind.

I guess they all lie.

https://wyrk.com/buffalo-bills-top-destination/ "I don't think you can talk about the Bills and not talk about winning," said Jones. That has a lot to do with people wanting to come here in free agency," added Jones. Jones said he was on the number two defense last year, but Buffalo was number one and wanted to come here when free agency hit. Read More: New Bills Player Explains Why Buffalo is a Top NFL Destination | https://wyrk.com/buffalo-bills-top-destination/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral

Maybe, maybe not. Not sure if that means anything if he did. It's like you're insinuating they ALL wanted to go somewhere else but they weren't wanted or pursued hard enough so they settled for the Bills.

I think Tim Settle and DaQuan Jones will tell you differently. Settled "whooed" in his press conference and Jones is from Binghamton.

It's fate. He is the final piece to bringing home the Lombardi.

They also explain what the Chief Statistician does as well. Did you miss the part where they describe what he's responsible for? What do you think he does then? Oh, the Titans absolutely do and proven it the last two years? Since the Jets beat the Titans last year, I guess that means they have a better roster lol. You think the better roster wins every time? If that's your philosophy, there should be undefeated teams all the time if they have the best roster. Jags have a better roster than us too I guess. If Josh Allen doesn't slip at the goaline, would that mean the Bills have the better roster? You're allowed to be wrong about the Titans having a better roster than the Bills. You're definitely alone with this thinking. If the argument is the Rams, Bucs, The only coach that I know of that didn't play any football was Todd Haley. But he also grew up in an NFL family where he learned from them. Yes I trust Bill Walsh and Vince Lombardi because they played football. I didn't specify NFL, I said played the game. Both Lombardi and Walsh played college football. I'm talking about some PFF guy who never, ever played the game. https://247sports.com/nfl/detroit-lions/Article/Detroit-Lions-TJ-Lang-Most-NFL-players-think-Pro-Football-Focus-is-garbage-107401154/ Is TJ Lang allowed to be wrong too? “My opinion is there’s no way you can possibly accurately grade offensive linemen if you haven’t done that job before in your life. A lot of these guys, they’re not qualified to be grading NFL players,” Lang told the Valenti Show on 97.1 The Ticket. “A lot of the stuff I realize is pretty basic, obvious information. If I clearly just get whooped and let up a sack, you can say, ‘Yeah, that guy let up a sack.'” “But they don’t know anything about identification, what offensive linemen are supposed to do. They think if a guy blitzes off the edge, that’s automatically the tackle’s block, but a lot of times that’s not the case. They’ve always graded me well, which I don’t mind, but I still don’t respect it,” Lang said. “I know most of the guys that I’ve played with absolutely hate it, just because it’s started to gain so much steam now where Sunday Night Football, Thursday Night Football, they’re actually showing stats up there for the players,” said Lang. “I think it’s absolute garbage and I think most players do.” “If a guy clearly gets beat, that’s one thing. But if you’re going to say, ‘This guy didn’t pick up the linebacker, this guy missed a blitz,’ there’s no possible way that you can know that unless you know what the offensive linemen’s responsibilities are. And nobody else knows that,” Lang said. “I don’t know what Arizona’s offensive line does. They might do something completely different than what we do. “Especially a guy sitting on the outside behind his computer looking at the game, there’s no way he knows what the hell’s going on either. It’s a total joke, in my opinion, as far as it goes grading offensive linemen.”

What makes the stat official? The NFL actually provides a guide for it. You can also just look on their website and they'll show you the official statistics. They don't recognize "pass rush win rate" as that's a subjective "stat" only used by PFF. https://www.nflgsis.com › gsis › stadiumguides 7 of 38 Chief Statistician The chief statistician is selected by the NFL League Office, subject to the Commissioner’s approval and shall have the responsibility to make decisions involving judgment, i.e., yardage on all plays, etc., subject to review by the League’s official statistician. The chief statistician at each game is to provide the news media with a halftime summary score sheet and at the conclusion of the game with a final summary score sheet. These forms are generated by the Game Statistics and Information System (GSIS) and the home club is responsible for duplicating the reports and distributing to all working media in the press box. In addition, the chief statistician shall, within an hour after the game, phone the League’s official statistician to answer any questions. The chief statistician shall compare the GSIS-generated statistics against any manually recorded play-by-play and/or statistics and notify the League’s official statisticians of any areas of disagreement between the manual statistics and GSIS (official) statistics; such notification shall occur within 24 hours after the completion of the game. What do these statisticians hired by the NFL do all day if they don't compute stats? Again, I think Simmons is a great player. I have never disputed that. If he was a FA and we signed him, I would be thrilled. What I disputed is your firm stance that he is the second best defensive player in the league. Your evidence is all subjective and you argue as in you can't be wrong. I mean you are still standing firm that the Titans have a better roster than the Bills. Yes, it's all subjective but the overwhelming consensus is that the Bills have a much, much better roster. You like to do research, show me any ranking from any site (except of course a Titans message board) where they the Titans above the Bills. It's not even close and you just want to be the only one standing on this hill. You forgot one important piece of PFF Analysts...they hire people from "all walks of life" and people who have never played before. That's an analyst you trust? I've never played cricket so does that mean if I can read a guide and teach me how to analyst a play? And yes, journalists also grade plays too. And to be honest, I think PFF is trash. I just used them because you were trying to use that as sufficient evidence. Eric Wood was on WGR talking about PFF and how it's not very reliable and suffers from context. He talked about a specific play where he was graded negatively. He said his job was to pull but the DT pushed the RG so far back into the backfield causing a traffic jam. Wood got tripped up and couldn't get to his spot to execute the block. PFF graded Wood negatively for not getting to the block but the RG wasn't graded negatively. Also the famous one. Some dude, possibly from England watched this Packers game and said "I don't think that's a good throw or a tough enough throw" LOL. https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/pro-football-focus-gives-aaron-rodgers-negative-grade-after-5-touchdown-performance/ On Monday night, Aaron Rodgers completed 24 of 35 passes (68.6 percent) for 333 yards, five touchdowns and zero interceptions. He did this against the impressive Kansas City defense, which had given up an average of 277 yards over the first two weeks, allowing five touchdowns, making two interceptions and sacking the quarterback eight times. Rodgers rightfully had all of the ESPN analysts fawning over his abilities, because, let's face it -- he's 31 years and is the best quarterback in the league right now. But not everybody was impressed. The folks at Pro Football Focus, who grade every single player on every single play on a scale from negative-2.0 to plus-2.0, ended up giving Rodgers a -0.8 rating on the night. Yes, a negative grade. Say what? PFF's Ben Stockwell tried to explain. Stockewell wrote that only two of Rodgers' touchdowns came after good throws. "The other three touchdowns, however, were passes thrown short of the end zone on speed outs to Randall Cobb. Were they bad throws? No, they were expected throws with the credit going to Cobb for fighting through contact or defeating the coverage with speed to the edge. That makes these zero-graded throws: Three passes that have a massive effect on Rodgers' statistical performance but do not increase his grade," Stockwell wrote. PFF also harshly graded Rodgers for a play on which he fumbled in the second quarter, as well as a third-quarter pass that should have been intercepted but wasn't. In fact, much of the "criticism" of Rodgers sounds incredibly similar to what PFF said about Brady when the website ranked as the 33rd best player in the NFL for the 2010 season. (That 2010 season, you might remember, was the one when Brady became the first-ever player to win the MVP by a unanimous vote.) Back in 2010, PFF wrote: "It's not that Brady (who isn't that far off from Drew Brees) isn't capable of making these [spectacular] plays, or isn't even making them, he's just not being asked to do it as regularly as Aaron Rodgers and others were. Consider it a compliment to the New England system that it doesn't put Brady in a situation where he has to constantly make breathtaking throws." And today, PFF wrote of Rodgers: "Rodgers did his job last night, but his job was executing simple throws, putting the ball quickly in the hands of receivers like Randall Cobb in favorable matchups on short throws, and allowing others to do the heavy lifting." (Brady, by the way, earned a 4.6 grade for his shredding of the Jaguars on Sunday.)

Yeah but he traded Dareus, Darby and Watkins the year before…curse him!