Buffalo_Gal

Adding the AP article where that came from: link

If someone had told me she'd be on the stage for round 2, and not the first "candidate" from those first 2 "debates" to drop, I'd have thought they were loonie. Well, loonier than she is. My biggest concern is people start to take her seriously, and we end up with President Williamson. Yikes. It is mildly amusing for a bazillion Rs to send her one dollar donations so she makes it to the next debate stage, but what if...

Oh come on, give them some credit - they were smarter than that! They used PASSWORD123. Whaddya think they are, dumb or something?

There are so many things I want to say - all of them fairly crude - but I'll just drop the link instead:

You'll have to pry my air-conditioning out of my cold (heh), dead hands. Someone tell this woman to put on a sweater. Shesh

Here are the Epstein charges unsealed

LOL Yeah, that polling at 17% in your district is gonna translate to a hard run at a president very popular with R-voters. He's a goober.

We shall see:

This is going around again. It may have been posted here in 2015. Guy knew/knows everyone. Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black Book (from 2004-2005)

Which makes me wonder why they would let anyone except Biden (who is an old white guy aka a throw-away candidate) get the nomination. I've thought Kamala was the "chosen one" since she declared. Why "waste" her on 2020 though?

The jabbering about "linked to Trump" should be "linked to Trump as President Trump is on the list to testify against Epstein". And as far as the GOPe President Trump was "forced" or "needed" to have as part of his administration, I agree. Whether it was via coercion, due to who could pass the confirmation hearings, who had some inkling on how things could possibly get done when dealing with the swap, yes, I am certain a lot of his administration was compromise candidates.

Cool image! Full text (from wiki): Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.[1]

I have seen people calling it what it is: Klantifa.

Why would anyone think counting illegals for representation is a normal thing to do? They are here ILLEGALLY. The only thing they should count for is deportation numbers.

The judge found the rights of the victims were impacted due to the light sentence. The question is why was there such a light sentence? My question is why is Alexander Acosta still head of Labor? Unless this doesn't lead to him? That Techno_fog thread @Deranged Rhino linked to above is very interesting. (Techno_fog has something about Cyrus Vance Jr giving a sweetheart deal as DA but he wasn't sworn in until 2010, so I am not sure how that ties together). The head of the DOJ in 2007 was Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey. In 2008 Mukasey was head of the DOJ that was "supervising" this case. So, who are they after?

I wonder if we will see another actress like AOC come-about? Since the whole political-world is on to what happened and how "she" (quotes because it is a team-sport) came to be a rep, will it be "allowed" to happen again? Or will the Ds take steps to watch and ensure it does not happen again? And, will AOC be primaried for 2020, or just have her seat go bye-bye in 2022 (assuming Nancy lives long enough to make those decisions)?

Already started on twitter, trying to make it all tie to Trump. Shesh these people are stupid. My question is why is Alexander Acosta still secretary of Labor?

Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking of minors in Florida and New York Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein has been arrested for allegedly sex trafficking minors in Florida and New York between 2002 and 2005. The 66-year-old registered sex offender faces federal sex trafficking charges and will appear in court in New York on Monday, the Daily Beast first reported. He was taken into custody by the FBI on Saturday after landing in New York following an overseas flight, according to NBC News. His attorney, Martin Weinberg, has so far declined to comment. </snip>

Oy, another Trump/Russia conspiracy theorist has come down to PPP to lecture everyone that has been following this closely for several years now that no one in this sub-forum knows anything about what happened, or who actually conspired to rig an election. It is a rinse and repeat cycle. I get that people like conspiracy theories, I really do. I also understand that many people hate to be wrong, cannot admit when they are wrong, refuse to educate themselves on how they were wrong, and try and deflect from their wrongness with whataboutisms. Must be a tough way to go through life being so willfully ignorant.

THAT is what you took away from this?

Technically, you can submit anything for a patent; simply pay the fee and fill out the paperwork, submit. That does not mean your claim will result in a patent being awarded (a magic broom is going to be rejected by the examiners quite quickly). But yeah, you can submit for anything.