Jump to content

Boatdrinks

Community Member
  • Posts

    16,951
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Boatdrinks

  1. Because only a limited number of things are challengeable under the rules. PI is really the first time they have allowed challenges to a “ judgment call” and then only reluctantly. Changing the calls could have huge effects on the game, because the rules aren’t enforced to the letter. Pandora’s box would be opened. Those other calls such as spots, catches are really not judgment calls, just video evidence is used because of the speed of the game. Using video evidence when things are seen but let go due to judgment is another story.
  2. Maybe, but again the game would be completely different ( and probably a lot less popular) if OPI were strictly enforced in every instance.
  3. Much of the modern passing game ( and a big reason for inflated stats) is about getting the ball out of the QBs hands quickly and into the hands of a speedy skill position player. The longer the QB holds the ball, the bigger the risk. It’s a good creative use of a play by Daboll, but it’s not new either. So far, I’m pretty happy with Dabolls ideas and calls this year.
  4. Not the first place, by a mile, but the geography is limiting. It has good food and a bar with a TV. Not exactly a fan hangout, but that area isn’t my favorite hang, either. Just a suggestion and yes it’s farther up Main.
  5. One would think King holds some sway, but in this case I think he’ll be ignored. He’s pointing out what seems obvious, but it’s actaully working the way the league wants it. That’s because they want it to be available, but rarely if ever used. They can’t really come out and say that, but the message being sent is clear. Coaches have been testing it, and the response has been universal : Don’t use this unless it’s the playoffs or similar and the game is literally on the line. It will turn the game into a joke if used even sporadically in just about every NFL contest. NFL rules like offensive holding or defensive PI are enforced intermittently and inconsistently just to keep teams “ honest”. The game would be unwatchable if they were always enforced to the letter. Although, with the preponderance of yellow flags in most games lately I have to wonder.
  6. While the call was awful, their team could have stopped the Rams from scoring and forcing overtime . The Saints also had the ball in the OT and didn’t score iirc so the non call didn’t exactly end the game. Challenges have always been limited. Scrutinizing an area of the game where rules violations often go uncalled isn’t a can of worms the NFL really wanted to open. They just wanted a mechanism to reverse a terrible call or non call in a high profile situation that leaves them with egg on their face.
  7. They just signed a new agreement and most have lucrative full time jobs elsewhere so I’d guess they are just fine with it.
  8. It’s obvious to me, and should be to anyone paying attention. The league caved in due to backlash and embarrassment , but honestly reviewing / overturning non PI calls is terrible for the game. Imagine if they could challenge offensive holding ? It’d be ridiculous. It’s like that stupid blue line challenge thing in hockey disallowing goals that happen a half minute later. Any NFL fan knows that lots of ( technically) PI things go uncalled, and most would prefer to “ let them play” except for egregious infractions. The league has essentially sent the message to not waste your time or your timeout unless it’s a huge missed call and probably only in the playoffs or playoff berth deciding situation. Edit : more to your point in the thread title , I do not believe it’s any kind of revolt by the officials. Rather, more of a concerted effort with the league being on board. It’s meant as a fail safe in a game deciding situation during the postseason and that’s about it.
  9. Couldn’t agree more. Mahomes seems very down to earth, and yeah KC is closer to a Buffalo than say LA or NYC. Be it interviews or whatever, I don’t see a bit of AB or OBJ in Pat Mahomes. While that draft has been rehashed to death, I can’t see “ fit” or personality, character etc as a reason the Bills wouldn’t draft Mahomes. That had zero to with it imo.
  10. Agreed. Seems like a good guy, teammate, and ultimately pretty humble. Haven’t seen anything about him that would make him “ un- Buffalo “ Very weird take.
  11. KC has the best QB in the AFCW, while NE has won the AFCE about 15 of the last 17 years or something. That’s probably why.
  12. Eagle House on Main has good grub and TV in the bar.
  13. And his numbers are actually better so far this year than last. Saying Mahomes is nothing special is ludicrous.
  14. Yep, a proven, young player is better than a draft pick at WR. The time for a drafted WR was last year or earlier.
  15. Hey, that’s what point spreads are for. Have to tempt $$$ on both sides. 17 is huge for an NFL game.
  16. Okay Phil, perhaps you need to add “ Bills “ to the poll to satisfy the masters of the obvious on the board. Any team is it’s own biggest threat because they actually have to win their own games, but whatever floats boats.
  17. While I empathize with FANS who may feel some level of BBFS, that poster is a troll and not a fan ( I have it blocked fwiw, your mileage may vary) that only posts statements critical of the Bills, their players and their organization. As for actual fans of the team, they need to realize that as difficult as most of the seasons were from 2000 thru 2016 were, they are the past. Most everyone in a key position with the team has been replaced. Those seasons have zero impact on the current team, Head Coach, players, and FO. Some fans may be gun shy, and I get it, but let it go. Any team in the league is potentially it’s own worst enemy. It’s a circular argument intended to take a legitimate thread in a completely different direction. Believe what you will, but this Bills organization is doing a lot of things ( refreshingly ) right and some optimism is warranted because they’ve earned it. As an aside to Jobot- obviously NE and KC are favored to win divisions and will likely claim playoff spots.
  18. Not many teams in NFL history have managed a playoff berth after an 0-4 start. The Jets are very likely to be 1-5 after their next game. Unless they manage to beat NE, they’d best hold off on their playoff celebration. As for the Bills , if they somehow lost to the Dolphins ( I don’t care how) gloom and doom would be 100% warranted here. I don’t think it will happen, but what would you expect after what would amount to a massive organizational failure ? Sunshine and rainbows ?
  19. Actually, it’s not. One could say that about virtually any team and end the discussion. It’s a troll answer and this poster should not be encouraged on the board.
  20. That’s a purely subjective argument. Most would put Pats and Chiefs as 1 and 2 , and I still would as well. While Watson is excellent and the best player on that team, it’s not clear that HOU would beat the Bills head to head. In fact, last year’s edition of the Bills ( much worse) seemed well on their way to upsetting the Texans at home until Allen was injured. Pickerman came in and we all know the rest. Anyway, it’s about matchups and I think if HOU and BUF played each other the home team would be a slight favorite.
  21. Is this legit ? Hate those unis ...
  22. And the owners could have built a new stadium in SD for the same or less than they paid to the NFL as a relocation fee. Strange situation.
  23. The Bills haven’t been playing run first football this year. The lack of scoring hasn’t come from conservative playcalling. It’s been turnovers and poor execution.
  24. It’s a balancing act. You’re winning on the fly with a young QB that’s still learning and making mistakes sometimes. McD has a top defense and he’s facing a low powered offense. He’s not going to be tempted to give that team any short fields or cheap points. Point differential can come into play at the end, but it’s way down the line. Win the game, and don’t give them anything easy.
×
×
  • Create New...