oldmanfan

If you do not want to root for the Bills, then leave the site. This is supposed to be a site for fans that want their team to win. You want to be entertained go see a movie.

You root for entertainment vs. the Bills. Bills fans come to this site. Fans that root for their team to win. Don't you get it? Enough from you already.

I imagine they will go after guys like Hyde and Poyer. A little under the radar but guys they know can play and that are dedicated to their craft.

I wish many if you had been around in the 60's. Watching the original team in the Rockpile was an experience.

No one needs to be fired and no one is going to get fired just because you have your panties in a bunch.

Because it wins, at least last week. And because it's football the way some of us like it to be.

Times two

No one needs to be fired over anything right now and no one will be fired any time in the near future

Difference = Draft pick

Trade or cut its's the same difference. You can't make this stuff up, folks.

You said above you'd rather see them lose in an "entertaining" game. If you want the Bills to lose I have no idea why you are on a Bills fans website. Fans of a team want their team to win. And last Sunday was as entertaining as you can get.

The problem is that too many people assume because he was drafted in round 1 that it meant he's automatically supposed to be a great pass rusher. HE's more a solid all around type guy, plays the run well, gets some pressure in the pass rush, they can move him inside, and such.

You'd rather be entertained and see the Bills lose. You have no business being on a site where Bills fans hang out then.

Check the playoff teams from last year

So for some the Bills should be entertaining rather than a winner. That makes a whole lot of sense.

I like to see wins.

Say it every time with your takes. You're the guy that would have traded everything for Winston, a guy who sits behind Fitzpatrick. Your analysis of QBs has little value.

Look at si.com this week. And the response was to some moron saying he's lost the locker room as if they have any clue. Reading is something most of us learned in the first grade or earlier. Try reading the posts before commenting.

They are one measure. He has had ups and downs as any rookie QB starting out has. The other 4 guys have ups and downs as well. I have no problem with objective analysis but this nonsense that he has no chance or has never shown the ability to play in the league is beyond ridiculous. It belies what anyone watching the games with even a hint of objectivity has seen.

4 games. Team won 2. Let me say again, 4 games and won 2. And your comment is he has never (repeat: never) shown an ability to be successful at the NFL level. 4 games. Two vicotories. Honestly, just stop with this nonsense.

I see you have yourself confused with a Bills player if you think you knows what goes on in their locker room. You're a joke.

It's time for you to keep quiet. Everyone who knows anything about football talks about how well McD has coached given a team with limited talent, and how he has a solid locker room. But you somehow think you know different based on information you claim is true that you have no way of knowing is valid. Do you hang out in the locker room? No.

Watched the film, some of his analysis seems good and others I'd question. I think he's assuming a guy in his 4th start should know more than most guys do. And his attempt to draw comparisons to performances in college, where he also had limited resources around him, to somehow say he was bad then and will be bad now, is a little absurd to me. To old farts like me there are just way too many of these sites where guys I've never heard of offer up these critiques as if they're experts. And when I ask what his expertise is (because, again, when you google his name I couldn't find a bio) all I get are snarky comments.

Seems like an odd move. I guess Hyde and Bush are ready to go. And they like Neal. Probably be back on the PS this time tomorrow.

Why do you refuse to read? Why? One of the first things I wrote was that I tried to Google the guy to see what his background was, and couldn't find anything. So I asked folks here about it so I can judge. Instead of giving me info, all you want to do is throw out snarky crap. If you know about his background, why not share it? He breaks down this 22 film stuff as if he's a pro. It would be helpful to me to know something about his background to evaluate his critique.